Literature DB >> 12520407

Reaching for virtual objects: binocular disparity and the control of prehension.

Paul B Hibbard1, Mark F Bradshaw.   

Abstract

Although, in principle, binocular cues provide veridical information about the three-dimensional shape of objects, our perception on the basis of these cues is distorted systematically. The consequences of these distortions may be less serious than they first appear, however, since in everyday life we rarely are required to judge the absolute shape, size or distance of objects. An important exception to this is in the control of prehension, where veridical information about an object to be grasped is required to plan the transport of the hand and to select the most appropriate grip. Here we investigate whether binocular cues provide accurate depth information for the control of prehension using disparity-defined, virtual objects and report that whilst binocular disparity can support prehensile movements, the kinematic indices, which reflect distance-reached and perceived size, show clear biases. These results suggest that accurate metric depth information for the control of prehension is not available from binocular cues in isolation.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12520407     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-002-1295-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  17 in total

1.  Large perspective changes yield perception of metric shape that allows accurate feedforward reaches-to-grasp and it persists after the optic flow has stopped!

Authors:  Young-Lim Lee; Geoffrey P Bingham
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-06-19       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Grasping in absence of feedback: systematic biases endure extensive training.

Authors:  Chiara Bozzacchi; Robert Volcic; Fulvio Domini
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Lack of depth constancy for grasping movements in both virtual and real environments.

Authors:  Chiara Bozzacchi; Fulvio Domini
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Two eyes in action.

Authors:  Eli Brenner; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-12-06       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Grasping reveals visual misjudgements of shape.

Authors:  Raymond H Cuijpers; Eli Brenner; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-05-30       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Non-obstructing 3D depth cues influence reach-to-grasp kinematics.

Authors:  Christopher J Worssam; Lewis C Meade; Jason D Connolly
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Motor primitives of pointing movements in a three-dimensional workspace.

Authors:  Christoph Schütz; Thomas Schack
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Monocular guidance of reaches-to-grasp using visible support surface texture: data and model.

Authors:  Rachel A Herth; Xiaoye Michael Wang; Olivia Cherry; Geoffrey P Bingham
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Judging surface slant for placing objects: a role for motion parallax.

Authors:  Stefan Louw; Jeroen B J Smeets; Eli Brenner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-07-14       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Dissociation between vergence and binocular disparity cues in the control of prehension.

Authors:  Dean R Melmoth; Mithu Storoni; Georgina Todd; Alison L Finlay; Simon Grant
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-07-31       Impact factor: 2.064

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.