Literature DB >> 26611301

A three dimensional view of stereopsis in dentistry.

M A Mon-Williams1, F Mushtaq1, R M Wilkie1, B Khambay2, A Keeling2, M Manogue2.   

Abstract

Stereopsis and its role in dental practice has been a topic of debate in recent editions of this Journal. These discussions are particularly timely as they come at a point when virtual reality simulators are becoming increasingly popular in the education of tomorrow's dentists. The aim of this article is to discuss the lack of robust empirical evidence to ascertain the relationship (if any) between stereopsis and dentistry and to build a case for the need for further research to build a strong evidence base on the topic.

Mesh：

Year:  2015        PMID： 26611301     DOI： 10.1038/sj.bdj.2015.881

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Dent J        ISSN： 0007-0610            Impact factor:   1.626


  21 in total

1.  Accommodation, occlusion, and disparity matching are used to guide reaching: a comparison of actual versus virtual environments.

Authors:  G P Bingham; A Bradley; M Bailey; R Vinner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Perceiving slant about a horizontal axis from stereopsis.

Authors:  M S Banks; I T Hooge; B T Backus
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Two eyes in action.

Authors:  Eli Brenner; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-12-06       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  Does stereopsis matter in humans?

Authors:  A R Fielder; M J Moseley
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 5.  The role of stereopsis (three-dimensional vision) in dentistry: review of the current literature.

Authors:  M Syrimi; N Ali
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 1.626

6.  Integrating stereopsis with monocular interpretations of planar surfaces.

Authors:  K A Stevens; A Brookes
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Depth and distance perception of dentists and dental students.

Authors:  T Dimitrijevic; B Kahler; G Evans; M Collins; A Moule
Journal:  Oper Dent       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 2.440

8.  When two eyes are better than one in prehension: monocular viewing and end-point variance.

Authors:  Andrea Loftus; Philip Servos; Melvyn A Goodale; Nicole Mendarozqueta; Mark Mon-Williams
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-05-26       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  The effects of absence of stereopsis on performance of a simulated surgical task in two-dimensional and three-dimensional viewing conditions.

Authors:  Edward Bloch; Nabil Uddin; Laura Gannon; Khadija Rantell; Saurabh Jain
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 4.638

10.  The binocular advantage in visuomotor tasks involving tools.

Authors:  Jenny C A Read; Shah Farzana Begum; Alice McDonald; Jack Trowbridge
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2013-03-20
View more
  3 in total

1.  Early assessment with a virtual reality haptic simulator predicts performance in clinical practice.

Authors:  Loulwa M Al-Saud; Faisal Mushtaq; Richard P Mann; Isra'a Mirghani; Ahmed Balkhoyor; Richard Harris; Cecilie Osnes; Andrew Keeling; Mark A Mon-Williams; Michael Manogue
Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn       Date:  2020-09-03

2.  Should prospective dental students be screened for colour vision deficits?

Authors:  F Mushtaq; R C Baraas; L M Al-Saud; I Mirghani; C van der Zee; E Yates; A Keeling; M A Mon-Williams; M Manogue
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 1.626

3.  Drilling into the functional significance of stereopsis: the impact of stereoscopic information on surgical performance.

Authors:  Loulwa M Al-Saud; Faisal Mushtaq; Isra'a Mirghani; Ahmed Balkhoyor; Andrew Keeling; Michael Manogue; Mark A Mon-Williams
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 3.117
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.