Literature DB >> 16315094

A microarray-based comparative analysis of gene expression profiles during grain development in transgenic and wild type wheat.

Per L Gregersen1, Henrik Brinch-Pedersen, Preben B Holm.   

Abstract

Global, comparative gene expression analysis is potentially a very powerful tool in the safety assessment of transgenic plants since it allows for the detection of differences in gene expression patterns between a transgenic line and the mother variety. In the present study, we compared the gene expression profile in developing seeds of wild type wheat and wheat transformed for endosperm-specific expression of an Aspergillus fumigatus phytase. High-level expression of the phytase gene was ensured by codon modification towards the prevalent codon usage of wheat genes and by using the wheat 1DX5HMW glutenin promoter for driving transgene expression. A 9K wheat unigene cDNA microarray was produced from cDNA libraries prepared mainly from developing wheat seed. The arrays were hybridised to flourescently labelled cDNA prepared from developing seeds of the transgenic wheat line and the mother variety, Bobwhite, at three developmental stages. Comparisons and statistical analyses of the gene expression profiles of the transgenic line vs. that of the mother line revealed only slight differences at the three developmental stages. In the few cases where differential expression was indicated by the statistical analysis it was primarily genes that were strongly expressed over a shorter interval of seed development such as genes encoding storage proteins. Accordingly, we interpret these differences in gene expression levels to result from minor asynchrony in seed development between the transgenic line and the mother line. In support of this, real time PCR validation of results from selected genes at the late developmental stage could not confirm differential expression of these genes. We conclude that the expression of the codon-modified A. fumigatus phytase gene in the wheat seed had no significant effects on the overall gene expression patterns in the developing seed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16315094     DOI: 10.1007/s11248-005-1526-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transgenic Res        ISSN: 0962-8819            Impact factor:   2.788


  23 in total

1.  Genes active in developing wheat endosperm.

Authors:  B C Clarke; M Hobbs; D Skylas; R Appels
Journal:  Funct Integr Genomics       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.410

2.  DNA arrays for analysis of gene expression.

Authors:  M B Eisen; P O Brown
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.600

Review 3.  Comparative safety assessment for biotech crops.

Authors:  Esther J Kok; Harry A Kuiper
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 19.536

Review 4.  Plant protein families and their relationships to food allergy.

Authors:  P R Shewry; F Beaudoin; J Jenkins; S Griffiths-Jones; E N Mills
Journal:  Biochem Soc Trans       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 5.407

5.  Normalization of cDNA microarray data.

Authors:  Gordon K Smyth; Terry Speed
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.608

6.  The stability of the Arabidopsis transcriptome in transgenic plants expressing the marker genes nptII and uidA.

Authors:  Souad El Ouakfaoui; Brian Miki
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 6.417

7.  Gene cloning, purification, and characterization of a heat-stable phytase from the fungus Aspergillus fumigatus.

Authors:  L Pasamontes; M Haiker; M Wyss; M Tessier; A P van Loon
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 8.  Opportunities for manipulating the seed protein composition of wheat and barley in order to improve quality.

Authors:  P R Shewry; A S Tatham; N G Halford; J H Barker; U Hannappel; P Gallois; M Thomas; M Kreis
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 2.788

9.  Maize polyubiquitin genes: structure, thermal perturbation of expression and transcript splicing, and promoter activity following transfer to protoplasts by electroporation.

Authors:  A H Christensen; R A Sharrock; P H Quail
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 4.076

10.  A transcriptomics resource for wheat functional genomics.

Authors:  Ian D Wilson; Gary L A Barker; Richard W Beswick; Sophie K Shepherd; Chungui Lu; Jane A Coghill; David Edwards; Philippa Owen; Rebecca Lyons; Jill S Parker; John R Lenton; Michael J Holdsworth; Peter R Shewry; Keith J Edwards
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 9.803

View more
  24 in total

1.  Transcriptome and metabolome profiling of field-grown transgenic barley lack induced differences but show cultivar-specific variances.

Authors:  Karl-Heinz Kogel; Lars M Voll; Patrick Schäfer; Carin Jansen; Yongchun Wu; Gregor Langen; Jafargholi Imani; Jörg Hofmann; Alfred Schmiedl; Sophia Sonnewald; Diter von Wettstein; R James Cook; Uwe Sonnewald
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-03-22       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Natural variation explains most transcriptomic changes among maize plants of MON810 and comparable non-GM varieties subjected to two N-fertilization farming practices.

Authors:  Anna Coll; Anna Nadal; Rosa Collado; Gemma Capellades; Mikael Kubista; Joaquima Messeguer; Maria Pla
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2010-03-27       Impact factor: 4.076

3.  Proteomic analysis of MON810 and comparable non-GM maize varieties grown in agricultural fields.

Authors:  Anna Coll; Anna Nadal; Michel Rossignol; Pere Puigdomènech; Maria Pla
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2010-10-23       Impact factor: 2.788

4.  Transcriptional profiling of wheat caryopsis development using cDNA microarrays.

Authors:  Debbie L Laudencia-Chingcuanco; Boryana S Stamova; Frank M You; Gerard R Lazo; Diane M Beckles; Olin D Anderson
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2007-01-09       Impact factor: 4.076

5.  Heterosis and polymorphisms of gene expression in an elite rice hybrid as revealed by a microarray analysis of 9198 unique ESTs.

Authors:  Yi Huang; Lida Zhang; Jianwei Zhang; Dejun Yuan; Caiguo Xu; Xianghua Li; Daoxiu Zhou; Shiping Wang; Qifa Zhang
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2006-08-29       Impact factor: 4.076

6.  Transcriptional responses of Italian ryegrass during interaction with Xanthomonas translucens pv. graminis reveal novel candidate genes for bacterial wilt resistance.

Authors:  Fabienne Wichmann; Torben Asp; Franco Widmer; Roland Kölliker
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 5.699

7.  Lack of repeatable differential expression patterns between MON810 and comparable commercial varieties of maize.

Authors:  Anna Coll; Anna Nadal; Montserrat Palaudelmàs; Joaquima Messeguer; Enric Melé; Pere Puigdomènech; Maria Pla
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2008-07-06       Impact factor: 4.076

8.  Fuzzy-logic based strategy for validation of multiplex methods: example with qualitative GMO assays.

Authors:  Gianni Bellocchi; Vincent Bertholet; Sandrine Hamels; W Moens; José Remacle; Guy Van den Eede
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 2.788

Review 9.  Evaluation of genetically engineered crops using transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic profiling techniques.

Authors:  Agnès E Ricroch; Jean B Bergé; Marcel Kuntz
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 8.340

10.  The environment exerts a greater influence than the transgene on the transcriptome of field-grown wheat expressing the Pm3b allele.

Authors:  Carolina Diaz Quijano; Susanne Brunner; Beat Keller; Wilhelm Gruissem; Christof Sautter
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 2.788

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.