Literature DB >> 18604604

Lack of repeatable differential expression patterns between MON810 and comparable commercial varieties of maize.

Anna Coll1, Anna Nadal, Montserrat Palaudelmàs, Joaquima Messeguer, Enric Melé, Pere Puigdomènech, Maria Pla.   

Abstract

The introduction of genetically modified organisms (GMO) in many countries follows strict regulations to assure that only products that have been safety tested in relation to human health and the environment are marketed. Thus, GMOs must be authorized before use. By complementing more targeted approaches, profiling methods can assess possible unintended effects of transformation. We used microarrays to compare the transcriptome profiles of widely commercialized maize MON810 varieties and their non-GM near-isogenic counterparts. The expression profiles of MON810 seedlings are more similar to those of their corresponding near-isogenic varieties than are the profiles of other lines produced by conventional breeding. However, differential expression of approximately 1.7 and approximately 0.1% of transcripts was identified in two variety pairs (AristisBt/Aristis and PR33P67/PR33P66) that had similar cryIA(b) mRNA levels, demonstrating that commercial varieties of the same event have different similarity levels to their near-isogenic counterparts without the transgene (note that these two pairs also show phenotypic differences). In the tissues, developmental stage and varieties analyzed, we could not identify any gene differentially expressed in all variety-pairs. However, a small set of sequences were differentially expressed in various pairs. Their relation to the transgenesis was not proven, although this is likely to be modulated by the genetic background of each variety.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18604604     DOI: 10.1007/s11103-008-9355-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Mol Biol        ISSN: 0167-4412            Impact factor:   4.076


  37 in total

Review 1.  Comparative safety assessment for biotech crops.

Authors:  Esther J Kok; Harry A Kuiper
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 19.536

2.  The stability of the Arabidopsis transcriptome in transgenic plants expressing the marker genes nptII and uidA.

Authors:  Souad El Ouakfaoui; Brian Miki
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 6.417

3.  Coherence between legal requirements and approaches for detection of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and their derived products.

Authors:  Arne Holst-Jensen; Marc De Loose; Guy Van den Eede
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 5.279

4.  Microarray analyses reveal that plant mutagenesis may induce more transcriptomic changes than transgene insertion.

Authors:  Rita Batista; Nelson Saibo; Tiago Lourenço; Maria Margarida Oliveira
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-02-26       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  A metabonomic study of transgenic maize (Zea mays) seeds revealed variations in osmolytes and branched amino acids.

Authors:  Cesare Manetti; Cristiano Bianchetti; Lorena Casciani; Cecilia Castro; Maria Enrica Di Cocco; Alfredo Miccheli; Mario Motto; Filippo Conti
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2006-07-10       Impact factor: 6.992

6.  Expression analysis of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) during salinity stress.

Authors:  Harkamal Walia; Clyde Wilson; Abdul Wahid; Pascal Condamine; Xinping Cui; Timothy J Close
Journal:  Funct Integr Genomics       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 3.410

7.  Application of two-dimensional gel electrophoresis to interrogate alterations in the proteome of gentically modified crops. 3. Assessing unintended effects.

Authors:  Martin C Ruebelt; Markus Lipp; Tracey L Reynolds; Jon J Schmuke; James D Astwood; Dean DellaPenna; Karl-Heinz Engel; Klaus-Dieter Jany
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2006-03-22       Impact factor: 5.279

8.  Analysis of chiral amino acids in conventional and transgenic maize.

Authors:  Miguel Herrero; Elena Ibáñez; Pedro J Martín-Alvarez; Alejandro Cifuentes
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2007-05-25       Impact factor: 6.986

9.  Assessing the potential for unintended effects in genetically modified potatoes perturbed in metabolic and developmental processes. Targeted analysis of key nutrients and anti-nutrients.

Authors:  Louise V T Shepherd; James W McNicol; Ruth Razzo; Mark A Taylor; Howard V Davies
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.145

10.  Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes.

Authors:  Jo Vandesompele; Katleen De Preter; Filip Pattyn; Bruce Poppe; Nadine Van Roy; Anne De Paepe; Frank Speleman
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2002-06-18       Impact factor: 13.583

View more
  21 in total

1.  Transcriptome and metabolome profiling of field-grown transgenic barley lack induced differences but show cultivar-specific variances.

Authors:  Karl-Heinz Kogel; Lars M Voll; Patrick Schäfer; Carin Jansen; Yongchun Wu; Gregor Langen; Jafargholi Imani; Jörg Hofmann; Alfred Schmiedl; Sophia Sonnewald; Diter von Wettstein; R James Cook; Uwe Sonnewald
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-03-22       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Natural variation explains most transcriptomic changes among maize plants of MON810 and comparable non-GM varieties subjected to two N-fertilization farming practices.

Authors:  Anna Coll; Anna Nadal; Rosa Collado; Gemma Capellades; Mikael Kubista; Joaquima Messeguer; Maria Pla
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2010-03-27       Impact factor: 4.076

3.  Proteomic analysis of MON810 and comparable non-GM maize varieties grown in agricultural fields.

Authors:  Anna Coll; Anna Nadal; Michel Rossignol; Pere Puigdomènech; Maria Pla
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2010-10-23       Impact factor: 2.788

4.  High CO2 concentration as an inductor agent to drive production of recombinant phytotoxic antimicrobial peptides in plant biofactories.

Authors:  Cristina Ruiz; Maria Pla; Nuri Company; Jordi Riudavets; Anna Nadal
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2015-12-19       Impact factor: 4.076

Review 5.  Evaluation of genetically engineered crops using transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic profiling techniques.

Authors:  Agnès E Ricroch; Jean B Bergé; Marcel Kuntz
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 8.340

6.  Gene expression profiles of MON810 and comparable non-GM maize varieties cultured in the field are more similar than are those of conventional lines.

Authors:  Anna Coll; Anna Nadal; Rosa Collado; Gemma Capellades; Joaquima Messeguer; Enric Melé; Montserrat Palaudelmàs; Maria Pla
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2009-04-26       Impact factor: 2.788

7.  Immunological and metabolomic impacts of administration of Cry1Ab protein and MON 810 maize in mouse.

Authors:  Karine Adel-Patient; Valeria D Guimaraes; Alain Paris; Marie-Françoise Drumare; Sandrine Ah-Leung; Patricia Lamourette; Marie-Claire Nevers; Cécile Canlet; Jérôme Molina; Hervé Bernard; Christophe Créminon; Jean-Michel Wal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Differentially expressed genes distributed over chromosomes and implicated in certain biological processes for site insertion genetically modified rice Kemingdao.

Authors:  Zhi Liu; Yunhe Li; Jie Zhao; Xiuping Chen; Guiliang Jian; Yufa Peng; Fangjun Qi
Journal:  Int J Biol Sci       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 6.580

9.  Non-uniform distribution pattern for differentially expressed genes of transgenic rice Huahui 1 at different developmental stages and environments.

Authors:  Zhi Liu; Jie Zhao; Yunhe Li; Wenwei Zhang; Guiliang Jian; Yufa Peng; Fangjun Qi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Proteomic evaluation of genetically modified crops: current status and challenges.

Authors:  Chun Yan Gong; Tai Wang
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 5.753

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.