Literature DB >> 21350035

Evaluation of genetically engineered crops using transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic profiling techniques.

Agnès E Ricroch1, Jean B Bergé, Marcel Kuntz.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2011        PMID： 21350035      PMCID： PMC3091128          DOI： 10.1104/pp.111.173609

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Physiol        ISSN： 0032-0889            Impact factor:   8.340


× No keyword cloud information.
  49 in total

1.  Transcriptome and metabolome profiling of field-grown transgenic barley lack induced differences but show cultivar-specific variances.

Authors:  Karl-Heinz Kogel; Lars M Voll; Patrick Schäfer; Carin Jansen; Yongchun Wu; Gregor Langen; Jafargholi Imani; Jörg Hofmann; Alfred Schmiedl; Sophia Sonnewald; Diter von Wettstein; R James Cook; Uwe Sonnewald
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-03-22       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The stability of the Arabidopsis transcriptome in transgenic plants expressing the marker genes nptII and uidA.

Authors:  Souad El Ouakfaoui; Brian Miki
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 6.417

3.  Microarray analyses reveal that plant mutagenesis may induce more transcriptomic changes than transgene insertion.

Authors:  Rita Batista; Nelson Saibo; Tiago Lourenço; Maria Margarida Oliveira
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-02-26       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Capillary electrophoresis time-of-flight mass spectrometry for comparative metabolomics of transgenic versus conventional maize.

Authors:  Tuuli Levandi; Carlos Leon; Mihkel Kaljurand; Virginia Garcia-Cañas; Alejandro Cifuentes
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 6.986

5.  A metabonomic study of transgenic maize (Zea mays) seeds revealed variations in osmolytes and branched amino acids.

Authors:  Cesare Manetti; Cristiano Bianchetti; Lorena Casciani; Cecilia Castro; Maria Enrica Di Cocco; Alfredo Miccheli; Mario Motto; Filippo Conti
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2006-07-10       Impact factor: 6.992

6.  High-level tryptophan accumulation in seeds of transgenic rice and its limited effects on agronomic traits and seed metabolite profile.

Authors:  Kyo Wakasa; Hisakazu Hasegawa; Hiroshi Nemoto; Fumio Matsuda; Haruna Miyazawa; Yuzuru Tozawa; Keiko Morino; Akira Komatsu; Tetsuya Yamada; Teruhiko Terakawa; Hisashi Miyagawa
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2006-08-14       Impact factor: 6.992

7.  Metabolite profiling of carotenoid and phenolic pathways in mutant and transgenic lines of tomato: identification of a high antioxidant fruit line.

Authors:  Marianne Long; David J Millar; Yukiko Kimura; Georgina Donovan; Jon Rees; Paul D Fraser; Peter M Bramley; G Paul Bolwell
Journal:  Phytochemistry       Date:  2006-04-17       Impact factor: 4.072

8.  Metabolite profiling of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) using 1H NMR spectroscopy as a tool to detect potential unintended effects following a genetic modification.

Authors:  Gwénaëlle Le Gall; Ian J Colquhoun; Adrienne L Davis; Geoff J Collins; Martine E Verhoeyen
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2003-04-23       Impact factor: 5.279

9.  Transcriptome analysis of nitrogen-efficient rice over-expressing alanine aminotransferase.

Authors:  Perrin H Beatty; Ashok K Shrawat; Rebecka T Carroll; Tong Zhu; Allen G Good
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2009-06-08       Impact factor: 9.803

10.  Assessing the potential for unintended effects in genetically modified potatoes perturbed in metabolic and developmental processes. Targeted analysis of key nutrients and anti-nutrients.

Authors:  Louise V T Shepherd; James W McNicol; Ruth Razzo; Mark A Taylor; Howard V Davies
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.145
View more
  55 in total

1.  Confronting the Gordian knot.

Authors:  L Val Giddings; Ingo Potrykus; Klaus Ammann; Nina V Fedoroff
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 54.908

2.  Metabolic changes in transgenic maize mature seeds over-expressing the Aspergillus niger phyA2.

Authors:  Jun Rao; Litao Yang; Jinchao Guo; Sheng Quan; Guihua Chen; Xiangxiang Zhao; Dabing Zhang; Jianxin Shi
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 4.570

3.  Assessing the ecological risks from the persistence and spread of feral populations of insect-resistant transgenic maize.

Authors:  Alan Raybould; Laura S Higgins; Michael J Horak; Raymond J Layton; Nicholas P Storer; Juan Manuel De La Fuente; Rod A Herman
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2011-10-15       Impact factor: 2.788

Review 4.  Why we need GMO crops in agriculture.

Authors:  Melvin J Oliver
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec

5.  Using problem formulation to clarify the meaning of weight of evidence and biological relevance in environmental risk assessments for genetically modified crops.

Authors:  Alan Raybould; Karen Holt; Ian Kimber
Journal:  GM Crops Food       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 3.074

6.  Problem formulation and phenotypic characterisation for the development of novel crops.

Authors:  Alan Raybould
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.788

7.  Patterns of metabolite changes identified from large-scale gene perturbations in Arabidopsis using a genome-scale metabolic network.

Authors:  Taehyong Kim; Kate Dreher; Ricardo Nilo-Poyanco; Insuk Lee; Oliver Fiehn; Bernd Markus Lange; Basil J Nikolau; Lloyd Sumner; Ruth Welti; Eve S Wurtele; Seung Y Rhee
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 8.340

8.  Proteome changes in tomato lines transformed with phytoene synthase-1 in the sense and antisense orientations.

Authors:  Francesca P Robertson; P Kaisa Koistinen; Christopher Gerrish; John M Halket; Raj K P Patel; Paul D Fraser; Peter M Bramley
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 6.992

9.  Metabolomics of cereals under biotic stress: current knowledge and techniques.

Authors:  Dirk Balmer; Victor Flors; Gaetan Glauser; Brigitte Mauch-Mani
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 5.753

10.  Proteomic evaluation of genetically modified crops: current status and challenges.

Authors:  Chun Yan Gong; Tai Wang
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 5.753
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.