Literature DB >> 20972621

Proteomic analysis of MON810 and comparable non-GM maize varieties grown in agricultural fields.

Anna Coll1, Anna Nadal, Michel Rossignol, Pere Puigdomènech, Maria Pla.   

Abstract

Worldwide maize is the second major agricultural commodity and around one-fourth is currently biotech, with significant application of the insect resistant event MON810 particularly in the European Union. Grains are the major commercialized part of the plant, and can be harvested after maturity (for food and feed purposes) or at late milky-starchy stage (for forage uses, with the whole plant). We assessed possible proteomic unintended effects of the MON810 transgene using two-dimensional gel electrophoresis coupled to mass spectrometry. To keep in a realistic scenario we used plants grown in agricultural fields in a region where ~50% of maize was MON810, and analyzed grains at milky-starchy stage. In maize, differential transcripts and metabolites between GM and comparable non-GM varieties tend to be variety specific. Thus, we analyzed two variety pairs, DKC6575/Tietar and PR33P67/PR33P66 which are considered representative of Food and Agriculture Organization 700 and 600 varieties commercially grown in the region. MON810 and non-GM milky-starchy grains had virtually identical proteomic patterns, with a very small number of spots showing fold-variations in the 1-1.8 range. They were all variety specific and had divergent identities and functions. Although 2DE allows the analysis of a limited dataset our results support substantial equivalence between MON810 and comparable non-GM varieties.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20972621     DOI: 10.1007/s11248-010-9453-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transgenic Res        ISSN: 0962-8819            Impact factor:   2.788


  32 in total

1.  The stability of the Arabidopsis transcriptome in transgenic plants expressing the marker genes nptII and uidA.

Authors:  Souad El Ouakfaoui; Brian Miki
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 6.417

2.  Coherence between legal requirements and approaches for detection of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and their derived products.

Authors:  Arne Holst-Jensen; Marc De Loose; Guy Van den Eede
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 5.279

3.  Capillary electrophoresis time-of-flight mass spectrometry for comparative metabolomics of transgenic versus conventional maize.

Authors:  Tuuli Levandi; Carlos Leon; Mihkel Kaljurand; Virginia Garcia-Cañas; Alejandro Cifuentes
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 4.  Selectable marker genes and unintended changes to the plant transcriptome.

Authors:  Brian Miki; Ashraf Abdeen; Yuzuki Manabe; Phil MacDonald
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 9.803

5.  Effect of transgenes on global gene expression in soybean is within the natural range of variation of conventional cultivars.

Authors:  K C Cheng; J Beaulieu; E Iquira; F J Belzile; M G Fortin; M V Strömvik
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2008-04-23       Impact factor: 5.279

6.  Image analysis of two-dimensional gel electrophoresis for comparative proteomics of transgenic and non-transgenic soybean seeds.

Authors:  A R Brandão; H S Barbosa; M A Z Arruda
Journal:  J Proteomics       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 4.044

7.  A metabonomic study of transgenic maize (Zea mays) seeds revealed variations in osmolytes and branched amino acids.

Authors:  Cesare Manetti; Cristiano Bianchetti; Lorena Casciani; Cecilia Castro; Maria Enrica Di Cocco; Alfredo Miccheli; Mario Motto; Filippo Conti
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2006-07-10       Impact factor: 6.992

8.  Application of two-dimensional gel electrophoresis to interrogate alterations in the proteome of gentically modified crops. 3. Assessing unintended effects.

Authors:  Martin C Ruebelt; Markus Lipp; Tracey L Reynolds; Jon J Schmuke; James D Astwood; Dean DellaPenna; Karl-Heinz Engel; Klaus-Dieter Jany
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2006-03-22       Impact factor: 5.279

9.  Characterization of polyadenylated cryIA(b) transcripts in maize MON810 commercial varieties.

Authors:  José Luis La Paz; Carlos Vicient; Pere Puigdomènech; Maria Pla
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 4.142

10.  Flavonoid profiling among wild type and related GM wheat varieties.

Authors:  Jean-Robert Ioset; Bartosz Urbaniak; Karine Ndjoko-Ioset; Judith Wirth; Frédéric Martin; Wilhelm Gruissem; Kurt Hostettmann; Christof Sautter
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2007-09-12       Impact factor: 4.076

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Evaluation of genetically engineered crops using transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic profiling techniques.

Authors:  Agnès E Ricroch; Jean B Bergé; Marcel Kuntz
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Potential subchronic food safety of the stacked trait transgenic maize GH5112E-117C in Sprague-Dawley rats.

Authors:  Shiwen Han; Shiying Zou; Xiaoyun He; Kunlun Huang; Xiaohong Mei
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 2.788

3.  Comparative proteomics of Bt-transgenic and non-transgenic cotton leaves.

Authors:  Limin Wang; Xuchu Wang; Xiang Jin; Ruizong Jia; Qixing Huang; Yanhua Tan; Anping Guo
Journal:  Proteome Sci       Date:  2015-05-02       Impact factor: 2.480

4.  Comparative Proteomics of Leaves from Phytase-Transgenic Maize and Its Non-transgenic Isogenic Variety.

Authors:  Yanhua Tan; Xiaoping Yi; Limin Wang; Cunzhi Peng; Yong Sun; Dan Wang; Jiaming Zhang; Anping Guo; Xuchu Wang
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 5.753

5.  A proteomic analysis of seeds from Bt-transgenic Brassica napus and hybrids with wild B. juncea.

Authors:  Yongbo Liu; Ying-Xue Zhang; Song-Quan Song; Junsheng Li; C Neal Stewart; Wei Wei; Yujie Zhao; Wei-Qing Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Comparative analysis of miRNA expression profiles in transgenic and non-transgenic rice using miRNA-Seq.

Authors:  Cheng Peng; Xiaoyun Chen; Xiaofu Wang; Xiaoli Xu; Wei Wei; Congmao Wang; Junfeng Xu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Proteomic analysis of phytase transgenic and non-transgenic maize seeds.

Authors:  Yanhua Tan; Zheng Tong; Qian Yang; Yong Sun; Xiang Jin; Cunzhi Peng; Anping Guo; Xuchu Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Proteomic evaluation of genetically modified crops: current status and challenges.

Authors:  Chun Yan Gong; Tai Wang
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 5.753

9.  Comparative proteomic analysis of genetically modified maize grown under different agroecosystems conditions in Brazil.

Authors:  Sarah Zanon Agapito-Tenfen; Miguel Pedro Guerra; Odd-Gunnar Wikmark; Rubens Onofre Nodari
Journal:  Proteome Sci       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 2.480

10.  Effect of stacking insecticidal cry and herbicide tolerance epsps transgenes on transgenic maize proteome.

Authors:  Sarah Zanon Agapito-Tenfen; Vinicius Vilperte; Rafael Fonseca Benevenuto; Carina Macagnan Rover; Terje Ingemar Traavik; Rubens Onofre Nodari
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 4.215

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.