Literature DB >> 16549091

Determination of trunk muscle forces for flexion and extension by using a validated finite element model of the lumbar spine and measured in vivo data.

Antonius Rohlmann1, Lars Bauer, Thomas Zander, Georg Bergmann, Hans-Joachim Wilke.   

Abstract

Muscle forces stabilize the spine and have a great influence on spinal loads. But little is known about their magnitude. In a former in vitro experiment, a good agreement with intradiscal pressure and fixator loads measured in vivo could be achieved for standing and extension of the lumbar spine. However, for flexion the agreement between in vitro and in vivo measurements was insufficient. In order to improve the determination of trunk muscle forces, a three-dimensional nonlinear finite element model of the lumbar spine with an internal fixation device was created and the same loads were applied as in a previous in vitro experiment. An extensive adaptation process of the model was performed for flexion and extension angles up to 20 degrees and -15 degrees, respectively. With this validated computer model intra-abdominal pressure, preload in the fixators, and a combination of hip- and lumbar flexion angle were varied until a good agreement between analytical and in vivo results was reached for both, intradiscal pressure and bending moments in the fixators. Finally, the fixators were removed and the muscle forces for the intact lumbar spine calculated. A good agreement with the in vivo results could only be achieved at a combination of hip- and lumbar flexion. For the intact spine, forces of 170, 100 and 600 N are predicted in the m. erector spinae for standing, 5 degrees extension and 30 degrees flexion, respectively. The force in the m. rectus abdominus for these body positions is less than 25 N. For more than 10 degrees extension the m. erector spinae is unloaded. The finite element method together with in vivo data allows the estimation of trunk muscle forces for different upper body positions in the sagittal plane. In our patients, flexion of the upper body was most likely a combination of hip- and lumbar spine bending.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16549091     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.02.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  27 in total

1.  Optimal stiffness of a pedicle-screw-based motion preservation implant for the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Antonius Rohlmann; Thomas Zander; Georg Bergmann; Hadi N Boustani
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Effect of the intra-abdominal pressure and the center of segmental body mass on the lumbar spine mechanics - a computational parametric study.

Authors:  W M Park; S Wang; Y H Kim; K B Wood; J A Sim; G Li
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.097

3.  Comparison of the effects of bilateral posterior dynamic and rigid fixation devices on the loads in the lumbar spine: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Antonius Rohlmann; Nagananda K Burra; Thomas Zander; Georg Bergmann
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-01-06       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  [Stiffening effect of a transsacral fusion system for the lumbosacral junction. A probabilistic finite element analysis and sensitivity study].

Authors:  H N Boustani; A Rohlmann; O Abouezzeddine; G Bergmann; T Zander
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  A probabilistic finite element analysis of the stresses in the augmented vertebral body after vertebroplasty.

Authors:  Antonius Rohlmann; Hadi Nabil Boustani; Georg Bergmann; Thomas Zander
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-04-02       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Effect of multilevel lumbar disc arthroplasty on spine kinematics and facet joint loads in flexion and extension: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Hendrik Schmidt; Fabio Galbusera; Antonius Rohlmann; Thomas Zander; Hans-Joachim Wilke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-04-02       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Biomechanical analysis of Ponte and pedicle subtraction osteotomies for the surgical correction of kyphotic deformities.

Authors:  Giuditta Salvi; Carl-Eric Aubin; Franck Le Naveaux; Xiaoyu Wang; Stefan Parent
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  A biomechanical model for estimating loads on thoracic and lumbar vertebrae.

Authors:  Sravisht Iyer; Blaine A Christiansen; Benjamin J Roberts; Michael J Valentine; Rajaram K Manoharan; Mary L Bouxsein
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 2.063

9.  Spinal loads after osteoporotic vertebral fractures treated by vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty.

Authors:  Antonius Rohlmann; Thomas Zander; Georg Bergmann
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-11-26       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Effect of an artificial disc on lumbar spine biomechanics: a probabilistic finite element study.

Authors:  Antonius Rohlmann; Anke Mann; Thomas Zander; Georg Bergmann
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-11-29       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.