Literature DB >> 11462082

The biomechanics of vertebroplasty. The effect of cement volume on mechanical behavior.

S M Belkoff1, J M Mathis, L E Jasper, H Deramond.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Ex vivo biomechanical study using osteoporotic cadaveric vertebral bodies.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the association between the volume of cement injected during percutaneous vertebroplasty and the restoration of strength and stiffness in osteoporotic vertebral bodies, two investigational cements were studied: Orthocomp (Orthovita, Malvern, PA) and Simplex 20 (Simplex P with 20% by weight barium sulfate content; Stryker-Howmedica-Osteonics, Rutherford, NJ). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Previous biomechanical studies have shown that injections of 8-10 mL of cement during vertebroplasty restore or increase vertebral body strength and stiffness; however, the dose-response association between cement volume and restoration of strength and stiffness is unknown.
METHODS: Compression fractures were experimentally created in 144 vertebral bodies (T6-L5) obtained from 12 osteoporotic spines harvested from female cadavers. After initial strength and stiffness were determined, the vertebral bodies were stabilized using bipedicular injections of cement totaling 2, 4, 6, or 8 mL and recompressed, after which post-treatment strength and stiffness were measured. Strength and stiffness were considered restored when post-treatment values were not significantly different from initial values.
RESULTS: Strength was restored for all regions when 2 mL of either cement was injected. To restore stiffness with Orthocomp, the thoracic and thoracolumbar regions required 4 mL, but the lumbar region required 6 mL. To restore stiffness with Simplex 20, the thoracic and lumbar regions required 4 mL, but the thoracolumbar region required 8 mL.
CONCLUSION: These data provide guidance on the cement volumes needed to restore biomechanical integrity to compressed osteoporotic vertebral bodies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11462082     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200107150-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  119 in total

1.  Ex vivo biomechanical comparison of hydroxyapatite and polymethylmethacrylate cements for use with vertebroplasty.

Authors:  Stephen M Belkoff; John M Mathis; Louis E Jasper
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Retrospective review of procedural parameters and outcomes of percutaneous vertebroplasty in 673 patients.

Authors:  Benny S Kim; Barbara Hum; Jung Cheol Park; In Sup Choi
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 1.610

3.  [Guidelines of the German Radiological Society for percutaneous vertebroplasty].

Authors:  T Helmberger; K Bohndorf; J Hierholzer; G Nöldge; D Vorwerk
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 0.635

4.  Is insufficient use of polymethylmethacrylate a cause for vertebroplasty failure necessitating repeat vertebroplasty?

Authors:  Louis Gilula
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 5.  [Complications of vertebroplasty].

Authors:  M A Rauschmann; D von Stechow; K-D Thomann; D Scale
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  Percutaneous vertebroplasty: complication avoidance and technique optimization.

Authors:  John M Mathis
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 7.  Vertebroplasty versus kyphoplasty: a comparison and contrast.

Authors:  John M Mathis; A Orlando Ortiz; Gregg H Zoarski
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Material properties of various cements for use with vertebroplasty.

Authors:  L E Jasper; H Deramond; J M Mathis; S M Belkoff
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.896

9.  The effect of standard and low-modulus cement augmentation on the stiffness, strength, and endplate pressure distribution in vertebroplasty.

Authors:  Michael Kinzl; Lorin M Benneker; Andreas Boger; Philippe K Zysset; Dieter H Pahr
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 10.  [Percutaneous vertebroplasty (pv): indications, contraindications, and technique].

Authors:  R T Hoffmann; T F Jakobs; A Wallnöfer; M F Reiser; T K Helmberger
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 0.635

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.