Literature DB >> 20016091

Diminutive digits discern delicate details: fingertip size and the sex difference in tactile spatial acuity.

Ryan M Peters1, Erik Hackeman, Daniel Goldreich.   

Abstract

We have observed that passive tactile spatial acuity, the ability to resolve the spatial structure of surfaces pressed upon the skin, differs subtly but consistently between the sexes, with women able to perceive finer surface detail than men. Eschewing complex central explanations, we hypothesized that this sex difference in somatosensory perception might result from simple physical differences between the fingers of women and men. To investigate, we tested 50 women and 50 men on a tactile grating orientation task and measured the surface area of the participants' index fingertips. In subsets of participants, we additionally measured finger skin compliance and optically imaged the fingerprint microstructure to count sweat pores. We show here that tactile perception improves with decreasing finger size, and that this correlation fully explains the better perception of women, who on average have smaller fingers than men. Indeed, when sex and finger size are both considered in statistical analyses, only finger size predicts tactile acuity. Thus, a man and a woman with fingers of equal size will, on average, enjoy equal tactile acuity. We further show that sweat pores, and presumably the Merkel receptors beneath them, are packed more densely in smaller fingers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20016091      PMCID: PMC3849661          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3684-09.2009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  39 in total

1.  Development of cortical reorganization in the somatosensory cortex of adult Braille students.

Authors:  A Sterr; M Müller; T Elbert; B Rockstroh; E Taub
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl       Date:  1999

2.  The effect of force and conformance on tactile intensive and spatial sensitivity.

Authors:  Gregory O Gibson; James C Craig
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-24       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Temporal factors in tactile spatial acuity: evidence for RA interference in fine spatial processing.

Authors:  S J Bensmaïa; J C Craig; K O Johnson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Synchrony: a neural correlate of somatosensory attention.

Authors:  A Roy; P N Steinmetz; S S Hsiao; K O Johnson; E Niebur
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 5.  Merkel cells.

Authors:  Nicholas Boulais; Laurent Misery
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2007-04-06       Impact factor: 11.527

6.  Sustained increase of somatosensory cortex excitability by tactile coactivation studied by paired median nerve stimulation in humans correlates with perceptual gain.

Authors:  Oliver Höffken; Mathias Veit; Frauke Knossalla; Silke Lissek; Barbara Bliem; Patrick Ragert; Hubert R Dinse; Martin Tegenthoff
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2007-08-16       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Age-related changes in tactile spatial resolution from 6 to 16 years old.

Authors:  Yannick Bleyenheuft; Caroline Cols; Carlyne Arnould; Jean-Louis Thonnard
Journal:  Somatosens Mot Res       Date:  2006 Sep-Dec       Impact factor: 1.111

8.  Localization of Merkel cells in the monkey skin: an anatomical model.

Authors:  Burak Güçlü; Greer K Mahoney; Lorraine J Pawson; Adam K Pack; Robert L Smith; Stanley J Bolanowski
Journal:  Somatosens Mot Res       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.111

9.  Performance of blind and sighted humans on a tactile grating detection task.

Authors:  Daniel Goldreich; Ingrid M Kanics
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2006-11

10.  A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator (TAPS).

Authors:  Daniel Goldreich; Michael Wong; Ryan M Peters; Ingrid M Kanics
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 1.355

View more
  50 in total

1.  Age-related changes in cutaneous sensation in the healthy human hand.

Authors:  Jocelyn L Bowden; Penelope A McNulty
Journal:  Age (Dordr)       Date:  2012-06-04

2.  Retrieval of associative information congruent with prior knowledge is related to increased medial prefrontal activity and connectivity.

Authors:  Marlieke T R van Kesteren; Mark Rijpkema; Dirk J Ruiter; Guillén Fernández
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Human touch receptors are sensitive to spatial details on the scale of single fingerprint ridges.

Authors:  Ewa Jarocka; J Andrew Pruszynski; Roland S Johansson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  To Improve Your Surgical Drilling Skills, Make Use of Your Index Fingers.

Authors:  Aernout R J Langeveld; Christine M E Rustenburg; Marco J M Hoozemans; Bart J Burger; Duncan E Meuffels
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Smooth at one end and rough at the other: influence of object texture on grasping behaviour.

Authors:  Catharina Glowania; L C J van Dam; E Brenner; M A Plaisier
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Gender-Based Occupational Segregation and Sex Differences in Sensory, Motor, and Spatial Aptitudes.

Authors:  Michael Baker; Kirsten Cornelson
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2018-10

7.  Characterization of sex-based differences in the mechanical properties of human finger glabrous tissue using a fiberoptic sensor.

Authors:  Lalit Venkatesan; Steven M Barlow
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 8.  Analysis of haptic information in the cerebral cortex.

Authors:  K Sathian
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Tactile perception of the roughness of 3D-printed textures.

Authors:  Chelsea Tymms; Denis Zorin; Esther P Gardner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Voice-related modulation of mechanosensory detection thresholds in the human larynx.

Authors:  Michael J Hammer; Mallory A Krueger
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.