Literature DB >> 12489664

Relative roles of spatial and intensive cues in the discrimination of spatial tactile stimuli.

Gregory O Gibson1, James C Craig.   

Abstract

Two psychophysical measures of tactile sensitivity--grating-orientation (GO) and smooth-grooved (SG) discrimination--were used to determine tactile spatial acuity with and without an intermediate surface (latex glove) interposed between the contactor and the skin. Measures were made at three locations that varied in sensitivity and in density of innervation of the primary afferent fibers: the index fingerpad (fingertip), palmar surface of the proximal phalanx (fingerbase), and the thenar eminence (palm). Neurophysiological studies have suggested that the density of innervation of SAI fibers is a limiting factor in spatial acuity. In the present study, without a glove, the GO thresholds varied as a function of location. With the glove, increases in the GO thresholds were relatively uniform and modest. Without a glove, however, the SG thresholds were well below the GO thresholds, and changing the site of stimulation had little effect on the threshold. With a glove, the SG thresholds increased by 100% to more than 300% as in comparison with those in the no-glove condition. The largest increases occurred at the less sensitive locations. The results of the GO task are consistent with the view that GO is a valid measure of spatial acuity. The results of the SG task, however, are inconsistent with previous results and suggest that both spatial and intensive factors are involved in this task.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12489664     DOI: 10.3758/bf03194759

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  8 in total

1.  To Improve Your Surgical Drilling Skills, Make Use of Your Index Fingers.

Authors:  Aernout R J Langeveld; Christine M E Rustenburg; Marco J M Hoozemans; Bart J Burger; Duncan E Meuffels
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  The effect of force and conformance on tactile intensive and spatial sensitivity.

Authors:  Gregory O Gibson; James C Craig
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-24       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Diminutive digits discern delicate details: fingertip size and the sex difference in tactile spatial acuity.

Authors:  Ryan M Peters; Erik Hackeman; Daniel Goldreich
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Tactile co-activation improves detection of afferent spatial modulation.

Authors:  Gregory O Gibson; Christopher D Makinson; Krish Sathian
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Discriminating smooth from grooved surfaces: effects of random variations in skin penetration.

Authors:  James C Craig; Roger P Rhodes; Gregory O Gibson; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-04-29       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Intact tactile anisotropy despite altered hand perception in complex regional pain syndrome: rethinking the role of the primary sensory cortex in tactile and perceptual dysfunction.

Authors:  Annika Reinersmann; Ian W Skinner; Thomas Lücke; Nicola Massy-Westropp; Henrik Rudolf; G Lorimer Moseley; Tasha R Stanton
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Two-point orientation discrimination versus the traditional two-point test for tactile spatial acuity assessment.

Authors:  Jonathan Tong; Oliver Mao; Daniel Goldreich
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Detection of Simulated Tactile Gratings by Electro-Static Friction Show a Dependency on Bar Width for Blind and Sighted Observers, and Preliminary Neural Correlates in Sighted Observers.

Authors:  Quoc C Vuong; Aya M Shaaban; Carla Black; Jess Smith; Mahmoud Nassar; Ahmed Abozied; Patrick Degenaar; Walid Al-Atabany
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 4.677

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.