Literature DB >> 26354318

Tactile orientation perception: an ideal observer analysis of human psychophysical performance in relation to macaque area 3b receptive fields.

Ryan M Peters1, Phillip Staibano2, Daniel Goldreich3.   

Abstract

The ability to resolve the orientation of edges is crucial to daily tactile and sensorimotor function, yet the means by which edge perception occurs is not well understood. Primate cortical area 3b neurons have diverse receptive field (RF) spatial structures that may participate in edge orientation perception. We evaluated five candidate RF models for macaque area 3b neurons, previously recorded while an oriented bar contacted the monkey's fingertip. We used a Bayesian classifier to assign each neuron a best-fit RF structure. We generated predictions for human performance by implementing an ideal observer that optimally decoded stimulus-evoked spike counts in the model neurons. The ideal observer predicted a saturating reduction in bar orientation discrimination threshold with increasing bar length. We tested 24 humans on an automated, precision-controlled bar orientation discrimination task and observed performance consistent with that predicted. We next queried the ideal observer to discover the RF structure and number of cortical neurons that best matched each participant's performance. Human perception was matched with a median of 24 model neurons firing throughout a 1-s period. The 10 lowest-performing participants were fit with RFs lacking inhibitory sidebands, whereas 12 of the 14 higher-performing participants were fit with RFs containing inhibitory sidebands. Participants whose discrimination improved as bar length increased to 10 mm were fit with longer RFs; those who performed well on the 2-mm bar, with narrower RFs. These results suggest plausible RF features and computational strategies underlying tactile spatial perception and may have implications for perceptual learning.
Copyright © 2015 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian inference; cortex; linear filter; somatosensory; spatial acuity

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26354318      PMCID: PMC4686289          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00631.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  76 in total

Review 1.  Tactile functions of mechanoreceptive afferents innervating the hand.

Authors:  K O Johnson; T Yoshioka; F Vega-Bermudez
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.177

2.  Second-order receptive fields reveal multidigit interactions in area 3b of the macaque monkey.

Authors:  Pramodsingh H Thakur; Paul J Fitzgerald; Steven S Hsiao
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Pacinian representations of fine surface texture.

Authors:  Sliman Bensmaïa; Mark Hollins
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2005-07

4.  Temporal factors in tactile spatial acuity: evidence for RA interference in fine spatial processing.

Authors:  S J Bensmaïa; J C Craig; K O Johnson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  A practical solution to the pervasive problems of p values.

Authors:  Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-10

6.  Spatiotemporal receptive fields of peripheral afferents and cortical area 3b and 1 neurons in the primate somatosensory system.

Authors:  Arun P Sripati; Takashi Yoshioka; Peter Denchev; Steven S Hsiao; Kenneth O Johnson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-02-15       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Analogous intermediate shape coding in vision and touch.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Yau; Anitha Pasupathy; Paul J Fitzgerald; Steven S Hsiao; Charles E Connor
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  A computational analysis of the relationship between neuronal and behavioral responses to visual motion.

Authors:  M N Shadlen; K H Britten; W T Newsome; J A Movshon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1996-02-15       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Modelling of orientation discrimination across the visual field.

Authors:  P Mäkelä; D Whitaker; J Rovamo
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1993 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  A physical constraint on perceptual learning: tactile spatial acuity improves with training to a limit set by finger size.

Authors:  Michael Wong; Ryan M Peters; Daniel Goldreich
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  5 in total

1.  Rapid geometric feature signaling in the simulated spiking activity of a complete population of tactile nerve fibers.

Authors:  Benoit P Delhaye; Xinyue Xia; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Tactile length contraction as Bayesian inference.

Authors:  Jonathan Tong; Vy Ngo; Daniel Goldreich
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  An Adaptation-Induced Repulsion Illusion in Tactile Spatial Perception.

Authors:  Lux Li; Arielle Chan; Shah M Iqbal; Daniel Goldreich
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Orientation processing by synaptic integration across first-order tactile neurons.

Authors:  Etay Hay; J Andrew Pruszynski
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 4.475

5.  Fast and accurate edge orientation processing during object manipulation.

Authors:  J Andrew Pruszynski; J Randall Flanagan; Roland S Johansson
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 8.140

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.