Literature DB >> 16269374

Forty-eight-hour pH monitoring increases sensitivity in detecting abnormal esophageal acid exposure.

Daniel Tseng1, Adnan Z Rizvi, M Brian Fennerty, Blair A Jobe, Brian S Diggs, Brett C Sheppard, Steven C Gross, Lee L Swanstrom, Nicole B White, Ralph W Aye, John G Hunter.   

Abstract

Ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH measurement is the standard for detecting abnormal esophageal acid exposure (AEAE), but it has a false negative rate of 15% to 30%. Wireless 48-hour pH monitoring (Bravo; Medtronic, Shoreview, MN) may allow more accurate detection of AEAE versus 24-hour pH monitoring. Forty-eight-hour wireless data were reviewed from 209 patients at three different tertiary care referral centers between 2003 and 2005. Manometric or endoscopic determination of the lower esophageal sphincter helped place the Bravo probe 5 to 6 cm above the lower esophageal sphincter. A total of 190 studies in 186 patients had sufficiently accurate data. There were 114 women and 72 men with an average age of 51 years. AEAE was defined by a Johnson-DeMeester score greater than 14.7 and was obtained in 115 of 190 studies (61%). Only 64 of 115 patients (56%) demonstrated AEAE for both days of the study, whereas 51 of 115 patients (44%) demonstrated AEAE in a single 24-hour period. There was no difference in the prevalence of AEAE on day 1 versus day 2 only (26% vs. 18%, P = .26). Compared with 24-hour alone data, 48-hour data showed 22% more patients with AEAE. Frequent day-to-day variability in patients with AEAE may be missed by a single 24-hour pH test. Forty-eight-hour pH testing may increase detection accuracy and sensitivity for AEAE by as much as 22%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16269374     DOI: 10.1016/j.gassur.2005.07.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  12 in total

1.  Reliability of 24-hour oesophageal pH monitoring under standardized conditions.

Authors:  T Franzén; L Tibbling Grahn
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.423

2.  Ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring. Reproducibility and variability of pH parameters.

Authors:  G J Wiener; T M Morgan; J B Copper; W C Wu; D O Castell; J W Sinclair; J E Richter
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Simultaneous recordings of oesophageal acid exposure with conventional pH monitoring and a wireless system (Bravo).

Authors:  S Bruley des Varannes; F Mion; P Ducrotté; F Zerbib; P Denis; T Ponchon; R Thibault; J P Galmiche
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2005-04-20       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Value of extended recording time with wireless pH monitoring in evaluating gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Chandra Prakash; Ray E Clouse
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 11.382

5.  Development of the 24-hour intraesophageal pH monitoring composite scoring system.

Authors:  L F Johnson; T R DeMeester
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 3.062

6.  Specificity and sensitivity of objective diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  K H Fuchs; T R DeMeester; M Albertucci
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 7.  Ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring: why, when, and what to do.

Authors:  Christopher G Streets; Tom R DeMeester
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.062

8.  Esophagogastric junction morphology predicts susceptibility to exercise-induced reflux.

Authors:  John E Pandolfino; Laura K Bianchi; Thomas J Lee; Ikuo Hirano; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 10.864

9.  Ambulatory 24-h esophageal pH monitoring: normal values, optimal thresholds, specificity, sensitivity, and reproducibility.

Authors:  J R Jamieson; H J Stein; T R DeMeester; L Bonavina; W Schwizer; R A Hinder; M Albertucci
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  How standard is a standard day during a standard ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring?

Authors:  F Mearin; A Balboa; J Dot; O Maldonado; J R Malagelada
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.423

View more
  23 in total

1.  Treatment of Refractory Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.

Authors:  Rishi D Naik; Matthew H Meyers; Michael F Vaezi
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2020-04

2.  New method for long-term monitoring of intragastric pH.

Authors:  Shouko Ono; Mototsugu Kato; Yuji Ono; Masahiro Asaka
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Early referral for 24-h esophageal pH monitoring may prevent unnecessary treatment with acid-reducing medications.

Authors:  David A Kleiman; Matthew J Sporn; Toni Beninato; Yasmin Metz; Carl Crawford; Thomas J Fahey; Rasa Zarnegar
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Prolonged Wireless pH Monitoring in Patients With Persistent Reflux Symptoms Despite Proton Pump Inhibitor Therapy.

Authors:  Stephen Hasak; Rena Yadlapati; Osama Altayar; Rami Sweis; Emily Tucker; Kevin Knowles; Mark Fox; John Pandolfino; C Prakash Gyawali
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 11.382

5.  Immunoserologic pepsin detection in the saliva as a non-invasive rapid diagnostic test for laryngopharyngeal reflux.

Authors:  Emre Ocak; Gözde Kubat; İrfan Yorulmaz
Journal:  Balkan Med J       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 2.021

6.  Gastroesophageal reflux symptoms do not correlate with objective pH testing after peroral endoscopic myotomy.

Authors:  Edward L Jones; Michael P Meara; Jennifer S Schwartz; Jeffrey W Hazey; Kyle A Perry
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-06-27       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Early referral for esophageal pH monitoring is more cost-effective than prolonged empiric trials of proton-pump inhibitors for suspected gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  David A Kleiman; Toni Beninato; Brian P Bosworth; Laurent Brunaud; Thomas Ciecierega; Carl V Crawford; Brian G Turner; Thomas J Fahey; Rasa Zarnegar
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-11-09       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Endoluminal fundoplication by a transoral device for the treatment of GERD: A feasibility study.

Authors:  G B Cadière; A Rajan; O Germay; J Himpens
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Endoscopic pH monitoring for patients with suspected or refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  B G Turner; J R Saltzman; L Hua; R Maurer; Natan Feldman; D L Carr-Locke; R Burakoff; J J Liu
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.522

10.  Effect of anesthesia on gastroesophageal reflux in children: a study using BRAVO wireless pH study measurements.

Authors:  L Rodriguez; A Morley-Fletcher; A Souza; L Rosengaus; S Nurko
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 3.598

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.