Literature DB >> 26264213

Effect of anesthesia on gastroesophageal reflux in children: a study using BRAVO wireless pH study measurements.

L Rodriguez1, A Morley-Fletcher2, A Souza3, L Rosengaus1, S Nurko1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Adult studies suggest conscious sedation increases gastroesophageal reflux (GER), but the role of anesthesia on GER in children is unclear. Our aim was to study the anesthesia effects on GER and pH study interpretation in children.
METHODS: Children undergoing BRAVO wireless pH capsule placement under anesthesia and study duration >36 h were included. We evaluated the pH parameters (number of reflux episodes >5 min, duration of longest reflux episode, time pH <4 and fraction time pH <4) at 1, 2, 6-h and total study duration blocks using 2 cutoff values (5.3% and 6%) for the worst day, average of both days, and 1st day alone. We compared time blocks to evaluate the effect of anesthesia on GER and the proportions of studies changing interpretation after excluding the 1st hour and 1st 2-h blocks to evaluate anesthesia effect on study interpretation. KEY
RESULTS: A total of 150 children were included. We found a significant increase on the pH parameters in the 1st hour compared to subsequent block times suggesting an effect of anesthesia on GER. We found no significant change in the proportion of studies interpreted as normal vs abnormal, however, excluding the initial 2 h of the study would change the study interpretation from abnormal to normal in up to 5% of patients. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: We found an effect of anesthesia increasing the GER parameters mainly in the 1st hour and up to the first 6 h of the study that may result in a change in the study interpretation.
© 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BRAVO wireless pH; anesthesia; children; gastroesophageal reflux

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26264213      PMCID: PMC4624481          DOI: 10.1111/nmo.12652

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil        ISSN: 1350-1925            Impact factor:   3.598


  23 in total

1.  24 Versus 48-hour bravo pH monitoring.

Authors:  Bani Chander; Nicole Hanley-Williams; Yanhong Deng; Anish Sheth
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.062

2.  Tolerance and reliability of wireless pH monitoring in children.

Authors:  Jay A Hochman; Jennifer Favaloro-Sabatier
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.839

3.  Comparison of data obtained from sedated versus unsedated wireless telemetry capsule placement: does sedation affect the results of ambulatory 48-hour pH testing?

Authors:  Peter C Belafsky; David A Godin; Juan Carlos Garcia; Nazir Rahim
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.325

4.  Use of 24-hour oesophageal pH-metry for the detection of gastro-oesophageal reflux in infants: what is the ideal score and the optimal threshold? A receiver-operating-characteristic analysis.

Authors:  A Carroccio; F Cavataio; E Acierno; G Montalto; D Lorello; M Tumminello; M Soresi; G Li Voti; G Iacono
Journal:  Ital J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  1997-08

5.  The effects of cricoid pressure, remifentanil, and propofol on esophageal motility and the lower esophageal sphincter.

Authors:  Kristian Thorn; Sven-Egron Thorn; Magnus Wattwil
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.108

6.  Impact of prolonged 48-h wireless capsule esophageal pH monitoring on diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease and evaluation of the relationship between symptoms and reflux episodes.

Authors:  Gerson Ricardo de Souza Domingues; Joaquim Prado P Moraes-Filho; Aline Gonçalves Leite Domingues
Journal:  Arq Gastroenterol       Date:  2011 Jan-Mar

7.  Value of extended recording time with wireless pH monitoring in evaluating gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Chandra Prakash; Ray E Clouse
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 11.382

8.  Reproducibility of 24-hour intraesophageal pH monitoring in pediatric patients.

Authors:  L Mahajan; R Wyllie; L Oliva; F Balsells; R Steffen; M Kay
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 7.124

9.  Forty-eight-hour pH monitoring increases sensitivity in detecting abnormal esophageal acid exposure.

Authors:  Daniel Tseng; Adnan Z Rizvi; M Brian Fennerty; Blair A Jobe; Brian S Diggs; Brett C Sheppard; Steven C Gross; Lee L Swanstrom; Nicole B White; Ralph W Aye; John G Hunter
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Midazolam as a sedative in esophageal manometry: a study of the effect on esophageal motility.

Authors:  K P Fung; M V Math; C O Ho; K M Yap
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 2.839

View more
  2 in total

1.  Pediatric Gastroesophageal Reflux Clinical Practice Guidelines: Joint Recommendations of the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition and the European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition.

Authors:  Rachel Rosen; Yvan Vandenplas; Maartje Singendonk; Michael Cabana; Carlo DiLorenzo; Frederic Gottrand; Sandeep Gupta; Miranda Langendam; Annamaria Staiano; Nikhil Thapar; Neelesh Tipnis; Merit Tabbers
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 2.839

2.  Evaluation of Gastroesophageal Reflux in Children as a Risk for Post-operative Nausea and Vomiting: An Observational Study.

Authors:  Aslınur Sagun; Handan Birbiçer; Mustafa Azizoğlu; Gökhan Berktuğ Bahadır; Ali Naycı
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2021-10
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.