Literature DB >> 3044715

Ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring. Reproducibility and variability of pH parameters.

G J Wiener1, T M Morgan, J B Copper, W C Wu, D O Castell, J W Sinclair, J E Richter.   

Abstract

If 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring is to be a useful diagnostic tool, it must reliably discriminate gastroesophageal reflux patients despite daily variations in distal esophageal acid exposure. To address this issue, we studied 53 subjects (14 healthy normals, 14 esophagitis patients, and 25 patients with atypical symptoms) with two ambulatory pH tests performed within 10 days of each other. Intrasubject reproducibility of 12 pH parameters to discriminate the presence of abnormal acid reflux was determined. As a group, the parameters of percent time with pH less than 4 (total, upright, recumbent) were most reproducible (80%). Therefore, a subject was defined as having gastroesophageal reflux disease if at least one of these three values were abnormal. Intrasubject reproducibility for the diagnosis of reflux disease was 89% for the entire sample. Among subsets, the reproducibility was 93% for the normals and esophagitis patients and 84% for the atypical symptom patients. Total percent time with pH less than 4 was the single most discriminate pH parameter (85%) and nearly equaled that of the three combined parameters (89%). The intrasubject variability of this parameter was determined by the mean +/- 2 SD of the relative differences between the two test results for all 53 subjects. Total percent time with pH less than 4 may vary between tests by a factor of 3.2-fold or less (218% higher to 69% lower). We conclude: (1) ambulatory 24-hr esophageal monitoring is a reproducible test for the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease; and (2) the large intrastudy variability in 24-hr total acid exposure may limit this test's usefulness as a measurement of therapeutic improvement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3044715     DOI: 10.1007/BF01535789

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  15 in total

1.  The physiology of heartburn.

Authors:  S G TUTTLE; F RUFIN; A BETTARELLO
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1961-08       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring. Technology searching for a clinical application.

Authors:  B W Ward; W C Wu; J E Richter; K W Lui; D O Castell
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 3.062

3.  Measurement of gastro-oesophageal acid reflux: its significance in hiatus hernia.

Authors:  I Lichter
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1974-04       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Twenty-four-hour pH monitoring of the distal esophagus. A quantitative measure of gastroesophageal reflux.

Authors:  L F Johnson; T R Demeester
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1974-10       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 5.  Pathogenesis of reflux esophagitis.

Authors:  W J Dodds; W J Hogan; J F Helm; J Dent
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  Introduction to sample size determination and power analysis for clinical trials.

Authors:  J M Lachin
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1981-06

7.  The lower esophageal sphincter. Physiologic and clinical aspects.

Authors:  D O Castell
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Ambulatory 24 hour intraesophageal pH-monitoring in the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  F Johnsson; B Joelsson; P E Isberg
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 9.  Gastroesophageal reflux. Pathogenesis, diagnosis, and therapy.

Authors:  J E Richter; D O Castell
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Development of the 24-hour intraesophageal pH monitoring composite scoring system.

Authors:  L F Johnson; T R DeMeester
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 3.062

View more
  79 in total

1.  An evidence-based appraisal of reflux disease management--the Genval Workshop Report.

Authors: 
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Esophageal histology does not provide additional useful information over clinical assessment in identifying reflux patients presenting for esophagogastroduodenoscopy.

Authors:  S Nandurkar; N J Talley; C J Martin; T Ng; S Adams
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  The role of regurgitation and other symptoms of reflux disease in palatal dental erosion; an audit project.

Authors:  D W Bartlett; A Anggiansah; B G Smith; E A Kidd
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  Functional Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD).

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2000-08

5.  Dynamic position versus 24-hour pH testing for detection of esophageal acid reflux disease.

Authors:  Carl G Schowengerdt
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Reproducibility of 24 hour oesophageal pH studies in infants.

Authors:  F J Hampton; U M MacFadyen; H Simpson
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 7.  Diagnosis and Management of Functional Heartburn.

Authors:  Christine Hachem; Nicholas J Shaheen
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  Capsule pH monitoring: is wireless more?

Authors:  R H Holloway
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 9.  Symptom association analysis in ambulatory gastro-oesophageal reflux monitoring.

Authors:  A J Bredenoord; B L A M Weusten; A J P M Smout
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  Acid perfusion test: does it have a role in the assessment of non cardiac chest pain?

Authors:  E G Hewson; J W Sinclair; C B Dalton; W C Wu; D O Castell; J E Richter
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 23.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.