Literature DB >> 11843037

Reliability of 24-hour oesophageal pH monitoring under standardized conditions.

T Franzén1, L Tibbling Grahn.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Twenty-four-hour pH monitoring is an investigation technique that can give both false-positive and false-negative results, depending on patient factors such as diet and different activities. The aim was to study the reproducibility of 24-h oesophageal pH monitoring under as standardized conditions as possible in patients with symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.
METHODS: Antimony pH electrodes were used in 22 adult patients who were investigated twice, 6 weeks apart, under identical conditions. They were hospitalized and were served a standardized diet which had been tested to contain no lower than pH 5.0. Neither coffee nor smoking was allowed. The patients had to refrain from proton-pump inhibitors for 10 days and H2 blockers for 2 days prior to the investigation. The paired t test was used.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference in total reflux time, upright or supine reflux time, or longest reflux periods between the two test occasions. However, there were discordant results in six patients who had normal total reflux time on one test occasion but pathological results on the other.
CONCLUSION: Since the biological variability of gastro-oesophageal reflux is not negligible from time to time, a normal 24-h oesophageal pH test should be assessed with caution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11843037     DOI: 10.1080/003655202753387275

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0036-5521            Impact factor:   2.423


  8 in total

1.  24-h multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring may be an inadequate test for detecting gastroesophageal reflux in patients with mixed typical and atypical symptoms.

Authors:  Michelle S Han; Michal J Lada; Dylan R Nieman; Andreas Tschoner; Christian G Peyre; Carolyn E Jones; Thomas J Watson; Jeffrey H Peters
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Symptom association analysis in ambulatory gastro-oesophageal reflux monitoring.

Authors:  A J Bredenoord; B L A M Weusten; A J P M Smout
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Forty-eight-hour pH monitoring increases sensitivity in detecting abnormal esophageal acid exposure.

Authors:  Daniel Tseng; Adnan Z Rizvi; M Brian Fennerty; Blair A Jobe; Brian S Diggs; Brett C Sheppard; Steven C Gross; Lee L Swanstrom; Nicole B White; Ralph W Aye; John G Hunter
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Nissen-Sleeve procedure versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in patients with morbid obesity and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: protocol for a non-inferiority randomised trial (GINSBY).

Authors:  Judith W H 't Hart; Bo J Noordman; Laser U Biter; Ivonne Leeuwenburgh; Martin Dunkelgrun; Jan A Apers
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 3.006

5.  Low reproducibility of 2 x 24-hour continuous esophageal pH monitoring in infants and children: a limiting factor for interventional studies.

Authors:  Rasmus Gaardskaer Nielsen; Søren Kruse-Andersen; Steffen Husby
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Recurrent symptoms after fundoplication with a negative pH study--recurrent reflux or functional heartburn?

Authors:  Sarah K Thompson; Wang Cai; Glyn G Jamieson; Alison Y Zhang; Jennifer C Myers; Zoe E Parr; David I Watson; Jenny Persson; Gerald Holtmann; Peter G Devitt
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-08-20       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Is Wireless Capsule pH Monitoring Better Than Catheter Systems?

Authors:  Joon Seong Lee
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2012-04-09       Impact factor: 4.924

8.  British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines for oesophageal manometry and oesophageal reflux monitoring.

Authors:  Nigel J Trudgill; Daniel Sifrim; Rami Sweis; Mark Fullard; Kumar Basu; Mimi McCord; Michael Booth; John Hayman; Guy Boeckxstaens; Brian T Johnston; Nicola Ager; John De Caestecker
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 23.059

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.