Literature DB >> 18071818

Endoluminal fundoplication by a transoral device for the treatment of GERD: A feasibility study.

G B Cadière1, A Rajan, O Germay, J Himpens.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A new endoluminal fundoplication (ELF) technique performed transorally using the EsophyXtrade mark device was evaluated for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in a prospective, feasibility clinical trial.
METHODS: Nineteen patients were enrolled into the study. Inclusion criteria were chronic and symptomatic GERD, proton pump inhibitor (PPI) dependence, and the absence of esophageal motility disorder. Two patients were excluded due to esophageal stricture and a 6 cm hiatal hernia. The median duration of GERD symptoms and PPI use in the remaining 17 patients was 10 and 6 years, respectively. The ELF procedure was designed to partially reconstruct the antireflux barrier through the creation of a valve at the gastroesophageal junction.
RESULTS: The ELF-created valves had a median length of 4 cm (range 3-5 cm) and circumference of 210 degrees (180-270 degrees ). Adherence of the valves to the endoscope was tight (n = 14) or moderate (n = 3). Hiatal hernias present in 13 patients (76%) were all reduced. Adverse events were limited to mild or moderate pharyngeal irritation and epigastric pain, which resolved spontaneously. After 12 months, the ELF valves (n = 16) had a median length of 3 cm (1-4 cm) and a circumference of 200 degrees (150-210 degrees ). Eighty-one percent of valves retained their tightness. The hiatal hernias present at the baseline remained reduced in 62% of patients. The median GERD-HRQL scores improved by 67% (17-6), and nine patients (53%) improved their scores by >or=50%. Eighty-two percent of patients were satisfied with the outcome of the procedure, 82% remained completely off PPIs, and 63% had normal pH.
CONCLUSION: The study demonstrated technical feasibility and safety of the ELF procedure using the EsophyX device. The study also demonstrated maintenance of the anatomical integrity of the ELF valves for 12 months and provided preliminary data on ELF efficacy in reducing the symptoms and medication use associated with GERD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18071818     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-007-9618-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  37 in total

Review 1.  Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Paul Moayyedi; Nicholas J Talley
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2006-06-24       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication is an effective treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  R A Hinder; C J Filipi; G Wetscher; P Neary; T R DeMeester; G Perdikis
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  AGA Institute medical position statement on the use of endoscopic therapy for gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Gary W Falk; M Brian Fennerty; Richard I Rothstein
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  The Stretta procedure for the treatment of GERD: 6 and 12 month follow-up of the U.S. open label trial.

Authors:  George Triadafilopoulos; John K DiBaise; Timothy T Nostrant; Neil H Stollman; Paul K Anderson; M Michael Wolfe; Richard I Rothstein; John M Wo; Douglas A Corley; Marco G Patti; Louis V Antignano; John S Goff; Steven A Edmundowicz; Donald O Castell; John C Rabine; Michael S Kim; David S Utley
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 5.  Endoscopic therapies of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Atif Iqbal; Vanessa Salinas; Charles-J Filipi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-05-07       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Forty-eight-hour pH monitoring increases sensitivity in detecting abnormal esophageal acid exposure.

Authors:  Daniel Tseng; Adnan Z Rizvi; M Brian Fennerty; Blair A Jobe; Brian S Diggs; Brett C Sheppard; Steven C Gross; Lee L Swanstrom; Nicole B White; Ralph W Aye; John G Hunter
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  The gastroesophageal flap valve: in vitro and in vivo observations.

Authors:  L D Hill; R A Kozarek; S J Kraemer; R W Aye; C D Mercer; D E Low; C E Pope
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  Endoscopic augmentation of the lower esophageal sphincter for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease: multicenter study of the Gatekeeper Reflux Repair System.

Authors:  P Fockens; M J Bruno; A Gabbrielli; S Odegaard; J Hatlebakk; H D Allescher; T Rösch; M Rhodes; C Bastid; J Rey; J Boyer; S Muehldorffer; U van den Hombergh; G Costamagna
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 10.093

9.  Endoscopic full-thickness plication for the treatment of GERD: a multicenter trial.

Authors:  Douglas Pleskow; Richard Rothstein; Simon Lo; Robert Hawes; Richard Kozarek; Gregory Haber; Christopher Gostout; Anthony Lembo
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 9.427

10.  Nissen fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Evaluation of primary repair in 100 consecutive patients.

Authors:  T R DeMeester; L Bonavina; M Albertucci
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  24 in total

1.  Single access laparoscopic surgery: Complementary or alternative to NOTES?

Authors:  Giovanni Dapri
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-06-27

Review 2.  Endoscopy in the diagnosis and management of motility disorders.

Authors:  Yael Kopelman; George Triadafilopoulos
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 3.  Efficacy of transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF) for the treatment of GERD: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiaoquan Huang; Shiyao Chen; Hetong Zhao; Xiaoqing Zeng; Jingjing Lian; Yujen Tseng; Jie Chen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Randomized controlled trial of transoral incisionless fundoplication vs. proton pump inhibitors for treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Bart P L Witteman; Jose M Conchillo; Nicolaas F Rinsma; Bark Betzel; Andrea Peeters; Ger H Koek; Laurents P S Stassen; Nicole D Bouvy
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 10.864

5.  Long-term efficacy of transoral incisionless fundoplication with Esophyx (Tif 2.0) and factors affecting outcomes in GERD patients followed for up to 6 years: a prospective single-center study.

Authors:  Pier Alberto Testoni; Sabrina Testoni; Giorgia Mazzoleni; Cristian Vailati; Sandro Passaretti
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  The Plicator procedure for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a registry study.

Authors:  John Birk; Ronald Pruitt; Gregory Haber; Isaac Raijman; Arthur Baluyut; Mick Meiselman; Shahriar Sedghi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Initial experience with new intraluminal devices for GERD, Barrett's esophagus, and obesity.

Authors:  Charles J Filipi; Rudolf J Stadlhuber
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Endoluminal fundoplication (ELF) for GERD using EsophyX: a 12-month follow-up in a single-center experience.

Authors:  Alessandro Repici; Uberto Fumagalli; Alberto Malesci; Roberta Barbera; Camilla Gambaro; Riccardo Rosati
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Two-year results of a feasibility study on antireflux transoral incisionless fundoplication using EsophyX.

Authors:  Guy-Bernard Cadière; Nathalie Van Sante; Jaime E Graves; Anna K Gawlicka; Amin Rajan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-03-14       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Gastroesophageal reflux disease: medical or surgical treatment?

Authors:  Theodore Liakakos; George Karamanolis; Paul Patapis; Evangelos P Misiakos
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2009-12-31       Impact factor: 2.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.