Literature DB >> 3660234

Specificity and sensitivity of objective diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

K H Fuchs1, T R DeMeester, M Albertucci.   

Abstract

To evaluate the diagnostic value of different tests for gastroesophageal reflux disease, a test population was constructed from 45 patients with symptoms of heartburn and regurgitation with or without esophagitis and 45 healthy subjects, who never experienced heartburn, regurgitation, or swallowing discomfort. The test population underwent esophagoscopy, standard acid reflux test, 24-hour pH monitoring, and manometry of the lower esophageal sphincter. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and the accuracy of the tests and test combinations were calculated. Esophagoscopy had a sensitivity of 62%, that is, only 62% of patients with the disease have evidence of mucosal damage on endoscopy. Manometric measurements of the lower esophageal sphincter had a sensitivity of 84%, a specificity of 89%, and an accuracy of 87%. Twenty-four hour esophageal pH monitoring had a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 96%. The results show that 24-hour pH monitoring can detect gastroesophageal reflux disease with an accuracy of 96% by measuring an increase in esophageal acid exposure. Manometry of the lower esophageal sphincter can detect a mechanically deficient sphincter as a cause of the disease with an accuracy of 87%. The test combination of 24-hour monitoring and motility studies can select patients with an accuracy of 91% who have an increase in esophageal exposure to gastric juice because of a deficient cardia. Antireflux surgery is designed to reduce esophageal exposure to gastric juice in patients with a deficient sphincter by creating a mechanical antireflux mechanism at the cardia. Therefore it is necessary to determine the mechanical status of the sphincter with manometry before surgery in such patients. Thus the indications for antireflux surgery are (1) uncontrolled symptoms of increased esophageal exposure to gastric juice; (2) a documented increase in esophageal exposure to gastric juice by 24-hour pH monitoring; and (3) a mechanically defective sphincter on motility with a pressure of 6 mm Hg or less, an overall length of 2 cm or less, and an abdominal length of 1 cm or less.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3660234

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  24 in total

1.  Ambulatory long-term pH monitoring in pigs.

Authors:  K A Gawad; R Wachowiak; C Rempf; W J Tiefenbacher; T Strate; E G Achilles; C Blöchle; J R Izbicki
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-08-15       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  [Correct diagnosis for indication in gastroesophageal reflux disease].

Authors:  A H Hölscher; E Bollschweiler; Ch Gutschow; P Malfertheiner
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Role of esophageal function tests in diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  M G Patti; U Diener; A Tamburini; D Molena; L W Way
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Early referral for 24-h esophageal pH monitoring may prevent unnecessary treatment with acid-reducing medications.

Authors:  David A Kleiman; Matthew J Sporn; Toni Beninato; Yasmin Metz; Carl Crawford; Thomas J Fahey; Rasa Zarnegar
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Metabolic syndrome increases risk of Barrett esophagus in the absence of gastroesophageal reflux: an analysis of SEER-Medicare Data.

Authors:  Jennifer Drahos; Winnie Ricker; Ruth Parsons; Ruth M Pfeiffer; Joan L Warren; Michael B Cook
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.062

6.  Early referral for esophageal pH monitoring is more cost-effective than prolonged empiric trials of proton-pump inhibitors for suspected gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  David A Kleiman; Toni Beninato; Brian P Bosworth; Laurent Brunaud; Thomas Ciecierega; Carl V Crawford; Brian G Turner; Thomas J Fahey; Rasa Zarnegar
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-11-09       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Esophageal function and Sjögren's syndrome.

Authors:  Françoise Volter; Olivier Fain; Emmanuel Mathieu; Michel Thomas
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Evaluation of gastroesophageal reflux disease following various reconstructive procedures for a distal gastrectomy.

Authors:  Takeo Kawamura; Akihiro Yasui; Yoshihisa Shibata; Norihiro Yuasa; Yuji Nimura
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2003-08-09       Impact factor: 3.445

9.  MRI patterns of Nissen fundoplication: normal appearance and mechanisms of failure.

Authors:  Christiane Kulinna-Cosentini; Wolfgang Schima; Ahmed Ba-Ssalamah; Enrico P Cosentini
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Altered esophageal pain threshold in irritable bowel syndrome.

Authors:  M Costantini; G C Sturniolo; G Zaninotto; R D'Incà; R Polo; R Naccarato; E Ancona
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 3.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.