Literature DB >> 16262493

Time course of linguistic information extraction from consecutive words during eye fixations in reading.

Albrecht W Inhoff1, Brianna M Eiter, Ralph Radach.   

Abstract

Sequential attention shift models of reading predict that an attended (typically fixated) word must be recognized before useful linguistic information can be obtained from the following (parafoveal) word. These models also predict that linguistic information is obtained from a parafoveal word immediately prior to a saccade toward it. To test these assumptions, sentences were constructed with a critical pretarget-target word sequence, and the temporal availability of the (parafoveal) target preview was manipulated while the pretarget word was fixated. Target viewing effects, examined as a function of prior target visibility, revealed that extraction of linguistic target information began 70-140 ms after the onset of pretarget viewing. Critically, acquisition of useful linguistic information from a target was not confined to the ending period of pretarget viewing. These results favor theoretical conceptions in which there is some temporal overlap in the linguistic processing of a fixated and parafoveally visible word during reading. ((c) 2005 APA, all rights reserved).

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16262493      PMCID: PMC2710455          DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.31.5.979

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  30 in total

1.  Eye movement control during reading: foveal load and parafoveal processing.

Authors:  W Schroyens; F Vitu; M Brysbaert; G d'Ydewalle
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1999-11

2.  Distinct subsystems for the parafoveal processing of spatial and linguistic information during eye fixations in reading.

Authors:  Albrecht W Inhoff; Ralph Radach; Brianna M Eiter; Barbara Juhasz
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2003-07

3.  The effects of frequency and predictability on eye fixations in reading: implications for the E-Z Reader model.

Authors:  Keith Rayner; Jane Ashby; Alexander Pollatsek; Erik D Reichle
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Parafoveal-on-foveal effects in normal reading.

Authors:  Alan Kennedy; Joël Pynte
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: implications for attention and eye movement control.

Authors:  J M Henderson; F Ferreira
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Is visual information integrated across successive fixations in reading?

Authors:  G W McConkie; D Zola
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1979-03

7.  Masking of foveal and parafoveal vision during eye fixations in reading.

Authors:  K Rayner; A W Inhoff; R E Morrison; M L Slowiaczek; J H Bertera
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Integrating information across eye movements.

Authors:  K Rayner; G W McConkie; D Zola
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1980-04       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Orienting of attention.

Authors:  M I Posner
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 2.143

10.  Mr. Chips 2002: new insights from an ideal-observer model of reading.

Authors:  Gordon E Legge; Thomas A Hooven; Timothy S Klitz; J Stephen Stephen Mansfield; Bosco S Tjan
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  12 in total

1.  Temporal overlap in the linguistic processing of successive words in reading: reply to Pollatsek, Reichle, and Rayner (2006a).

Authors:  Albrecht W Inhoff; Ralph Radach; Brianna Eiter
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Eye position changes during reading fixations are spatially selective.

Authors:  Albrecht W Inhoff; Matthew S Solomon; Bradley A Seymour; Ralph Radach
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-03-03       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Explorations in the language of perception and the perception of language.

Authors:  Ralph Radach; Arthur M Jacobs; Hermann J Müller
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-11

4.  Eye movements and non-canonical reading: comments on.

Authors:  Keith Rayner; Alexander Pollatsek; Simon P Liversedge; Erik D Reichle
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  The time course of presaccadic attention shifts.

Authors:  Heiner Deubel
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-10-07

6.  Immediate and delayed effects of word frequency and word length on eye movements in reading: a reversed delayed effect of word length.

Authors:  Alexander Pollatsek; Barbara J Juhasz; Erik D Reichle; Debra Machacek; Keith Rayner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Using E-Z Reader to model the effects of higher level language processing on eye movements during reading.

Authors:  Erik D Reichle; Tessa Warren; Kerry McConnell
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-02

8.  Evidence for direct control of eye movements during reading.

Authors:  Michael Dambacher; Timothy J Slattery; Jinmian Yang; Reinhold Kliegl; Keith Rayner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Word-Initial Letters Influence Fixation Durations during Fluent Reading.

Authors:  Christopher J Hand; Patrick J O'Donnell; Sara C Sereno
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-04-02

10.  The zoom lens of attention: Simulating shuffled versus normal text reading using the SWIFT model.

Authors:  Daniel J Schad; Ralf Engbert
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2012-05-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.