Literature DB >> 16258067

Concurrent working memory load can reduce distraction.

So-Yeon Kim1, Min-Shik Kim, Marvin M Chun.   

Abstract

People have difficulty performing two tasks at once. For example, maintaining items in working memory (WM) makes people more distractible. However, different types of WM load may have different effects on attentional selection depending on whether WM load overlaps with mechanisms involved in target or distractor processing. Three experiments examined the effect of concurrent WM load on Stroop tasks, a widely used measure of executive control and inhibition. Stroop interference increased when the type of WM load overlapped with the type of information required for the target task (experiment 1). In striking contrast, Stroop interference decreased when the type of WM load overlapped with distractor processing (experiment 2). Experiment 3 replicated these results in a different Stroop task. Thus, concurrent WM load does not always impair executive control; performance depends on how contents of WM and task-relevant information overlap. The results highlight how dissociable components of WM interact with perception and executive control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16258067      PMCID: PMC1283430          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0505454102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  16 in total

1.  The reverse Stroop effect.

Authors:  F H Durgin
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-03

2.  Overlapping mechanisms of attention and spatial working memory.

Authors:  E Awh; J Jonides
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Inferior temporal, prefrontal, and hippocampal contributions to visual working memory maintenance and associative memory retrieval.

Authors:  Charan Ranganath; Michael X Cohen; Cathrine Dam; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-04-21       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Modulating irrelevant motion perception by varying attentional load in an unrelated task.

Authors:  G Rees; C D Frith; N Lavie
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-11-28       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Pixel independence: measuring spatial interactions on a CRT display.

Authors:  D G Pelli
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

6.  The role of working memory in visual selective attention.

Authors:  J W de Fockert; G Rees; C D Frith; N Lavie
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-03-02       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 7.  Strategies and models of selective attention.

Authors:  A M Treisman
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1969-05       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention.

Authors:  N Lavie
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Tests of the automaticity of reading: dilution of Stroop effects by color-irrelevant stimuli.

Authors:  D Kahneman; D Chajczyk
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Visual search is slowed when visuospatial working memory is occupied.

Authors:  Geoffrey F Woodman; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-04
View more
  51 in total

1.  Neural Representation of Working Memory Content Is Modulated by Visual Attentional Demand.

Authors:  Anastasia Kiyonaga; Emma Wu Dowd; Tobias Egner
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Improving antisaccade performance in adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).

Authors:  Canan Karatekin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-04-25       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The influence of working memory load on the Simon effect.

Authors:  Xiao Zhao; Antao Chen; Robert West
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-10

4.  fMRI environment can impair memory performance in young and elderly adults.

Authors:  Angela H Gutchess; Denise C Park
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2006-06-12       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Interference resolution: insights from a meta-analysis of neuroimaging tasks.

Authors:  Derek Evan Nee; Tor D Wager; John Jonides
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  Trait anxiety and impoverished prefrontal control of attention.

Authors:  Sonia J Bishop
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2008-12-14       Impact factor: 24.884

7.  The working memory stroop effect: when internal representations clash with external stimuli.

Authors:  Anastasia Kiyonaga; Tobias Egner
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2014-06-23

8.  Functional split brain in a driving/listening paradigm.

Authors:  Shuntaro Sasai; Melanie Boly; Armand Mensen; Giulio Tononi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Investigating the impact of dynamic and static secondary tasks on task-switch cost.

Authors:  Miriam Gade; Karin Friedrich; Iring Koch
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-02

10.  Dual-task interference during obstacle clearance in healthy and balance-impaired older adults.

Authors:  Ka Chun Siu; Vipul Lugade; Li Shan Chou; Paul van Donkelaar; Marjorie H Woollacott
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.636

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.