Literature DB >> 21037167

The influence of working memory load on the Simon effect.

Xiao Zhao1, Antao Chen, Robert West.   

Abstract

The contribution of spatial and verbal working memory (WM) to the processing of stimulus location in the Simon task was examined in two experiments. Subjects performed the Simon task in single- and dual-task conditions. In the dual-task conditions, individuals first encoded the locations of four boxes/pseudocharacters or the identity of seven characters in memory, then responded to the color of a Simon stimulus, and finally received a test for the WM set. The Simon effect was insensitive to spatial WM load and was abolished by verbal WM load. These data reveal a role of verbal WM in the processing of spatial location in the Simon task. In addition, the data are inconsistent with dual-route models of the Simon effect and may support response discrimination accounts of the mechanisms underlying the processing of spatial location in the Simon task.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21037167     DOI: 10.3758/PBR.17.5.687

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  18 in total

1.  A parallel distributed processing model of stimulus-stimulus and stimulus-response compatibility.

Authors:  H H Zhang; J Zhang; S Kornblum
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  A response-discrimination account of the Simon effect.

Authors:  Ulrich Ansorge; Peter Wiihr
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects.

Authors:  C H Lu; R W Proctor
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1995-06

4.  Stimulus-response compatibility for mixed mappings and tasks with unique responses.

Authors:  Robert W Proctor; Kim-Phuong L Vu
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 2.143

5.  The impact of stimulus and response variability on S-R correspondence effects.

Authors:  Peter Wühr; Rupert Biebl; Ulrich Ansorge
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Concurrent working memory load can facilitate selective attention: evidence for specialized load.

Authors:  Soojin Park; Min-Shik Kim; Marvin M Chun
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 7.  Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility--a model and taxonomy.

Authors:  S Kornblum; T Hasbroucq; A Osman
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  The role of attention for the Simon effect.

Authors:  B Hommel
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1993

9.  Conditional and unconditional automaticity: a dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence.

Authors:  R De Jong; C C Liang; E Lauber
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Mental image reversal and verbal recoding: when ducks become rabbits.

Authors:  M A Brandimonte; W Gerbino
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1993-01
View more
  8 in total

1.  Working memory demands modulate cognitive control in the Stroop paradigm.

Authors:  Alexander Soutschek; Tilo Strobach; Torsten Schubert
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-03-06

2.  Searching working memory for the source of dual-task costs.

Authors:  Eliot Hazeltine; Timothy Wifall
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-07-07

3.  Carving executive control at its joints: Working memory capacity predicts stimulus-stimulus, but not stimulus-response, conflict.

Authors:  Matt E Meier; Michael J Kane
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  It wasn't me! Motor activation from irrelevant spatial information in the absence of a response.

Authors:  Carsten Bundt; Lara Bardi; Elger L Abrahamse; Marcel Brass; Wim Notebaert
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  The task-relevant attribute representation can mediate the Simon effect.

Authors:  Dandan Tang; Xiao Zhao; Antao Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Symbiosis of executive and selective attention in working memory.

Authors:  André Vandierendonck
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Training reveals the sources of Stroop and Flanker interference effects.

Authors:  Antao Chen; Dandan Tang; Xuefei Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Impact of Spatial and Verbal Short-Term Memory Load on Auditory Spatial Attention Gradients.

Authors:  Edward J Golob; Jenna Winston; Jeffrey R Mock
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-11-23
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.