Literature DB >> 16248311

Comparison of deformable and elastic foundation finite element simulations for predicting knee replacement mechanics.

Jason P Halloran1, Sarah K Easley, Anthony J Petrella, Paul J Rullkoetter.   

Abstract

Rigid body total knee replacement (TKR) models with tibiofemoral contact based on elastic foundation (EF) theory utilize simple contact pressure-surface overclosure relationships to estimate joint mechanics, and require significantly less computational time than corresponding deformable finite element (FE) methods. However, potential differences in predicted kinematics between these representations are currently not well understood, and it is unclear if the estimates of contact area and pressure are acceptable. Therefore, the objectives of the current study were to develop rigid EF and deformable FE models of tibiofemoral contact, and to compare predicted kinematics and contact mechanics from both representations during gait loading conditions with three different implant designs. Linear and nonlinear contact pressure-surface overclosure relationships based on polyethylene material properties were developed using EF theory. All other variables being equal, rigid body FE models accurately estimated kinematics predicted by fully deformable FE models and required only 2% of the analysis time. As expected, the linear EF contact model sufficiently approximated trends for peak contact pressures, but overestimated the deformable results by up to 30%. The nonlinear EF contact model more accurately reproduced trends and magnitudes of the deformable analysis, with maximum differences of approximately 15% at the peak pressures during the gait cycle. All contact area predictions agreed in trend and magnitude. Using rigid models, edge-loading conditions resulted in substantial overestimation of peak pressure. Optimal nonlinear EF contact relationships were developed for specific TKR designs for use in parametric or repetitive analyses where computational time is paramount. The explicit FE analysis method utilized here provides a unique approach in that both rigid and deformable analyses can be run from the same input file, thus enabling simple selection of the most appropriate representation for the analysis of interest.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16248311     DOI: 10.1115/1.1992522

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech Eng        ISSN: 0148-0731            Impact factor:   2.097


  18 in total

1.  The Influence of Component Alignment and Ligament Properties on Tibiofemoral Contact Forces in Total Knee Replacement.

Authors:  Colin R Smith; Michael F Vignos; Rachel L Lenhart; Jarred Kaiser; Darryl G Thelen
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  Co-simulation of neuromuscular dynamics and knee mechanics during human walking.

Authors:  Darryl G Thelen; Kwang Won Choi; Anne M Schmitz
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.097

3.  Evaluation of a musculoskeletal model with prosthetic knee through six experimental gait trials.

Authors:  Mohammad Kia; Antonis P Stylianou; Trent M Guess
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2014-01-11       Impact factor: 2.242

4.  Wear predictions for UHMWPE material with various surface properties used on the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty: a computational simulation study.

Authors:  Kyoung-Tak Kang; Juhyun Son; Ho-Joong Kim; Changhyun Baek; Oh-Ryong Kwon; Yong-Gon Koh
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 3.896

5.  Expedited patient-specific assessment of contact stress exposure in the ankle joint following definitive articular fracture reduction.

Authors:  Andrew M Kern; Donald D Anderson
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  An Open-Source Toolbox for Surrogate Modeling of Joint Contact Mechanics.

Authors:  Ilan Eskinazi; Benjamin J Fregly
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-07-13       Impact factor: 4.538

7.  Adaptive surrogate modeling for expedited estimation of nonlinear tissue properties through inverse finite element analysis.

Authors:  Jason P Halloran; Ahmet Erdemir
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2011-05-05       Impact factor: 3.934

8.  Design of Optimal Treatments for Neuromusculoskeletal Disorders using Patient-Specific Multibody Dynamic Models.

Authors:  Benjamin J Fregly
Journal:  Int J Comput Vis Biomech       Date:  2009-07-01

9.  Prediction and Validation of Load-Dependent Behavior of the Tibiofemoral and Patellofemoral Joints During Movement.

Authors:  Rachel L Lenhart; Jarred Kaiser; Colin R Smith; Darryl G Thelen
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 3.934

10.  Surrogate modeling of deformable joint contact using artificial neural networks.

Authors:  Ilan Eskinazi; Benjamin J Fregly
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2015-07-26       Impact factor: 2.242

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.