Literature DB >> 26220591

Surrogate modeling of deformable joint contact using artificial neural networks.

Ilan Eskinazi1, Benjamin J Fregly2.   

Abstract

Deformable joint contact models can be used to estimate loading conditions for cartilage-cartilage, implant-implant, human-orthotic, and foot-ground interactions. However, contact evaluations are often so expensive computationally that they can be prohibitive for simulations or optimizations requiring thousands or even millions of contact evaluations. To overcome this limitation, we developed a novel surrogate contact modeling method based on artificial neural networks (ANNs). The method uses special sampling techniques to gather input-output data points from an original (slow) contact model in multiple domains of input space, where each domain represents a different physical situation likely to be encountered. For each contact force and torque output by the original contact model, a multi-layer feed-forward ANN is defined, trained, and incorporated into a surrogate contact model. As an evaluation problem, we created an ANN-based surrogate contact model of an artificial tibiofemoral joint using over 75,000 evaluations of a fine-grid elastic foundation (EF) contact model. The surrogate contact model computed contact forces and torques about 1000 times faster than a less accurate coarse grid EF contact model. Furthermore, the surrogate contact model was seven times more accurate than the coarse grid EF contact model within the input domain of a walking motion. For larger input domains, the surrogate contact model showed the expected trend of increasing error with increasing domain size. In addition, the surrogate contact model was able to identify out-of-contact situations with high accuracy. Computational contact models created using our proposed ANN approach may remove an important computational bottleneck from musculoskeletal simulations or optimizations incorporating deformable joint contact models.
Copyright © 2015 IPEM. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomechanics; Elastic contact; Knee contact; Meta-model; Neural networks; Response surface; Surrogate modeling; Tibiofemoral joint

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26220591      PMCID: PMC5082752          DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2015.06.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Eng Phys        ISSN: 1350-4533            Impact factor:   2.242


  22 in total

1.  Automatic early stopping using cross validation: quantifying the criteria.

Authors:  Lutz Prechelt
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  1998-06

2.  Surrogate articular contact models for computationally efficient multibody dynamic simulations.

Authors:  Yi-Chung Lin; Raphael T Haftka; Nestor V Queipo; Benjamin J Fregly
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 2.242

3.  Comparison of deformable and elastic foundation finite element simulations for predicting knee replacement mechanics.

Authors:  Jason P Halloran; Sarah K Easley; Anthony J Petrella; Paul J Rullkoetter
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.097

4.  Simulation of a functional neuromuscular stimulation powered mechanical gait orthosis with coordinated joint locking.

Authors:  Curtis S To; Robert F Kirsch; Rudi Kobetic; Ronald J Triolo
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.802

5.  Response surface optimization for joint contact model evaluation.

Authors:  Yi-Chung Lin; Jack Farr; Kevin Carter; Benjamin J Fregly
Journal:  J Appl Biomech       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.833

6.  Estimates of muscle function in human gait depend on how foot-ground contact is modelled.

Authors:  Tim W Dorn; Yi-Chung Lin; Marcus G Pandy
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 1.763

7.  Redistribution of knee stress using laterally wedged insole intervention: Finite element analysis of knee-ankle-foot complex.

Authors:  Xuan Liu; Ming Zhang
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 2.063

8.  Relative performances of artificial neural network and regression mapping tools in evaluation of spinal loads and muscle forces during static lifting.

Authors:  N Arjmand; O Ekrami; A Shirazi-Adl; A Plamondon; M Parnianpour
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 9.  Knee joint forces: prediction, measurement, and significance.

Authors:  Darryl D D'Lima; Benjamin J Fregly; Shantanu Patil; Nikolai Steklov; Clifford W Colwell
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.617

10.  A neural network model to predict knee adduction moment during walking based on ground reaction force and anthropometric measurements.

Authors:  Julien Favre; Matthieu Hayoz; Jennifer C Erhart-Hledik; Thomas P Andriacchi
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-01-16       Impact factor: 2.712

View more
  3 in total

1.  An Open-Source Toolbox for Surrogate Modeling of Joint Contact Mechanics.

Authors:  Ilan Eskinazi; Benjamin J Fregly
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-07-13       Impact factor: 4.538

2.  A computational framework for simultaneous estimation of muscle and joint contact forces and body motion using optimization and surrogate modeling.

Authors:  Ilan Eskinazi; Benjamin J Fregly
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 2.242

3.  Artificial intelligence, machine learning and the evolution of healthcare: A bright future or cause for concern?

Authors:  L D Jones; D Golan; S A Hanna; M Ramachandran
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2018-05-05       Impact factor: 5.853

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.