Literature DB >> 21544674

Adaptive surrogate modeling for expedited estimation of nonlinear tissue properties through inverse finite element analysis.

Jason P Halloran1, Ahmet Erdemir.   

Abstract

Simulation-based prediction of specimen-specific biomechanical behavior commonly requires inverse analysis using geometrically consistent finite element (FE) models. Optimization drives such analyses but previous studies have highlighted a large computational cost dictated by iterative use of nonlinear FE models. The goal of this study was to evaluate the performance of a local regression-based adaptive surrogate modeling approach to decrease computational cost for both global and local optimization approaches using an inverse FE application. Nonlinear elastic material parameters for patient-specific heel-pad tissue were found, both with and without the surrogate model. Surrogate prediction replaced a FE simulation using local regression of previous simulations when the corresponding error estimate was less than a given tolerance. Performance depended on optimization type and tolerance value. The surrogate reduced local optimization expense up to 68%, but achieved accurate results for only 1 of 20 initial conditions. Conversely, up to a tolerance value of 20 N(2), global optimization with the surrogate yielded consistent parameter predictions with a concurrent decrease in computational cost (up to 77%). However, the local optimization method without the surrogate, although sensitive to the initial conditions, was still on average seven times faster than the global approach. Our results help establish guidelines for setting acceptable tolerance values while using an adaptive surrogate model for inverse FE analysis. Most important, the study demonstrates the benefits of a surrogate modeling approach for intensive FE-based iterative analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21544674      PMCID: PMC3150601          DOI: 10.1007/s10439-011-0317-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0090-6964            Impact factor:   3.934


  23 in total

Review 1.  Finite element analysis in spine research.

Authors:  M J Fagan; S Julian; A M Mohsen
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.617

Review 2.  Simulation in neurosurgery: a review of computer-based simulation environments and their surgical applications.

Authors:  Hani R Malone; Omar N Syed; Michael S Downes; Anthony L D'Ambrosio; Donald O Quest; Michael G Kaiser
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.654

3.  Probabilistic finite element prediction of knee wear simulator mechanics.

Authors:  Peter J Laz; Saikat Pal; Jason P Halloran; Anthony J Petrella; Paul J Rullkoetter
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2005-09-26       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Inverse analysis of constitutive models: biological soft tissues.

Authors:  Fulin Lei; A Z Szeri
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2006-05-30       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  A real time hyperelastic tissue model.

Authors:  Hualiang Zhong; Terry Peters
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.763

6.  An efficient probabilistic methodology for incorporating uncertainty in body segment parameters and anatomical landmarks in joint loadings estimated from inverse dynamics.

Authors:  Joseph E Langenderfer; Peter J Laz; Anthony J Petrella; Paul J Rullkoetter
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.097

Review 7.  Finite element methods in spine biomechanics research.

Authors:  L G Gilbertson; V K Goel; W Z Kong; J D Clausen
Journal:  Crit Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  1995

Review 8.  From structure to process, from organ to cell: recent developments of FE-analysis in orthopaedic biomechanics.

Authors:  R Huiskes; S J Hollister
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 2.097

Review 9.  Image-based models of cardiac structure in health and disease.

Authors:  Fijoy Vadakkumpadan; Hermenegild Arevalo; Anton J Prassl; Junjie Chen; Ferdinand Kickinger; Peter Kohl; Gernot Plank; Natalia Trayanova
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug

Review 10.  2009 Nicolas Andry Award: clinical biomechanics of third body acceleration of total hip wear.

Authors:  Thomas D Brown; Hannah J Lundberg; Douglas R Pedersen; John J Callaghan
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  5 in total

1.  Multiscale cartilage biomechanics: technical challenges in realizing a high-throughput modelling and simulation workflow.

Authors:  Ahmet Erdemir; Craig Bennetts; Sean Davis; Akhil Reddy; Scott Sibole
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 3.906

2.  Simulated transcatheter aortic valve deformation: A parametric study on the impact of leaflet geometry on valve peak stress.

Authors:  Kewei Li; Wei Sun
Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 2.747

3.  Summary of the DREAM8 Parameter Estimation Challenge: Toward Parameter Identification for Whole-Cell Models.

Authors:  Jonathan R Karr; Alex H Williams; Jeremy D Zucker; Andreas Raue; Bernhard Steiert; Jens Timmer; Clemens Kreutz; Simon Wilkinson; Brandon A Allgood; Brian M Bot; Bruce R Hoff; Michael R Kellen; Markus W Covert; Gustavo A Stolovitzky; Pablo Meyer
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 4.475

4.  A unified approach to model peripheral nerves across different animal species.

Authors:  Elisabetta Giannessi; Pier Nicola Sergi; Maria Rita Stornelli
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  Hamstrings Contraction Regulates the Magnitude and Timing of the Peak ACL Loading During the Drop Vertical Jump in Female Athletes.

Authors:  Ryo Ueno; Alessandro Navacchia; Nathan D Schilaty; Gregory D Myer; Timothy E Hewett; Nathaniel A Bates
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-09-29
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.