Literature DB >> 16247579

Telementoring versus on-site mentoring in virtual reality-based surgical training.

L Panait1, A Rafiq, V Tomulescu, C Boanca, I Popescu, A Carbonell, R C Merrell.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Telementoring can be an adjunct to surgical training using virtual reality surgical simulation. Telementoring is hypothesized to be as effective as a local mentor for surgical skills training.
METHODS: In this study, 20 Romanian medical students trained using a virtual reality surgical simulator (LapSim) with a telementor or local mentor. All the students watched an instructional module at the beginning of the exercise. The telementor, in the United States, interacted by videoconferencing. Before and after training sessions, tool path length and time for task completion were measured.
RESULTS: Instructional media and training with mentoring resulted in similar levels of performance between locally mentored and telementored groups. Right- and left-hand path length and time decreased significantly within each group from the initial to the final evaluation (p < 0.05) for most tasks (grasping, cutting, suturing). No significant difference was achieved for clip-applying.
CONCLUSIONS: Integration of instructional media with telementoring can be as effective for the development of surgical skills as local mentoring.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16247579     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-005-0113-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  10 in total

1.  Comparison of video trainer and virtual reality training systems on acquisition of laparoscopic skills.

Authors:  E C Hamilton; D J Scott; J B Fleming; R V Rege; R Laycock; P C Bergen; S T Tesfay; D B Jones
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-12-10       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  The transfer of basic skills learned in a laparoscopic simulator to the operating room.

Authors:  A Hyltander; E Liljegren; P H Rhodin; H Lönroth
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-05-07       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Objective psychomotor skills assessment of experienced, junior, and novice laparoscopists with virtual reality.

Authors:  A G Gallagher; K Richie; N McClure; J McGuigan
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Are surgery training programs ready for virtual reality? A survey of program directors in general surgery.

Authors:  R S Haluck; R L Marshall; T M Krummel; M G Melkonian
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 6.113

5.  Evaluation of structured and quantitative training methods for teaching intracorporeal knot tying.

Authors:  A M Pearson; A G Gallagher; J C Rosser; R M Satava
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-11-12       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Training in laparoscopic suturing skills using a new computer-based virtual reality simulator (MIST-VR) provides results comparable to those with an established pelvic trainer system.

Authors:  Shanu N Kothari; Brian J Kaplan; Eric J DeMaria; Timothy J Broderick; Ronald C Merrell
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.878

7.  Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study.

Authors:  Neal E Seymour; Anthony G Gallagher; Sanziana A Roman; Michael K O'Brien; Vipin K Bansal; Dana K Andersen; Richard M Satava
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Virtual reality as a metric for the assessment of laparoscopic psychomotor skills. Learning curves and reliability measures.

Authors:  A G Gallagher; R M Satava
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-07-29       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Skill acquisition and assessment for laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  J C Rosser; L E Rosser; R S Savalgi
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1997-02

10.  Objective evaluation of a laparoscopic surgical skill program for residents and senior surgeons.

Authors:  J C Rosser; L E Rosser; R S Savalgi
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1998-06
  10 in total
  11 in total

Review 1.  The LapSim virtual reality simulator: promising but not yet proven.

Authors:  Katherine Fairhurst; Andrew Strickland; Guy Maddern
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  [Telemedicine today].

Authors:  A Leis
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  Virtual reality does not meet expectations in a pilot study on multimodal laparoscopic surgery training.

Authors:  Felix Nickel; Vasile V Bintintan; Tobias Gehrig; Hannes G Kenngott; Lars Fischer; Carsten N Gutt; Beat P Müller-Stich
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4.  Educational implications for surgical telementoring: a current review with recommendations for future practice, policy, and research.

Authors:  K M Augestad; H Han; J Paige; T Ponsky; C M Schlachta; B Dunkin; J Mellinger
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Can a virtual reality surgical simulation training provide a self-driven and mentor-free skills learning? Investigation of the practical influence of the performance metrics from the virtual reality robotic surgery simulator on the skill learning and associated cognitive workloads.

Authors:  Gyusung I Lee; Mija R Lee
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Augmented reality telementoring (ART) platform: a randomized controlled trial to assess the efficacy of a new surgical education technology.

Authors:  Angelina M Vera; Michael Russo; Adnan Mohsin; Shawn Tsuda
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Evolving robotic surgery training and improving patient safety, with the integration of novel technologies.

Authors:  I-Hsuan Alan Chen; Ahmed Ghazi; Ashwin Sridhar; Danail Stoyanov; Mark Slack; John D Kelly; Justin W Collins
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Coffee break has no impact on laparoscopic skills: a randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled parallel-group trial.

Authors:  Christoph Gerdes; Anna Maria Berghäuser; Julian Hipp; Martin Bäumlein; Svenja Hinrichs; Jan-Christoph Thomassen; Sebastian Hoffmann; Berthold Gerdes
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-08-30       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  Overcoming the Impact of COVID-19 on Surgical Mentorship: A Scoping Review of Long-distance Mentorship in Surgery.

Authors:  Layne N Raborn; Jeffrey E Janis
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 2.891

Review 10.  Utilising an Accelerated Delphi Process to Develop Guidance and Protocols for Telepresence Applications in Remote Robotic Surgery Training.

Authors:  Justin W Collins; Ahmed Ghazi; Danail Stoyanov; Andrew Hung; Mark Coleman; Tom Cecil; Anders Ericsson; Mehran Anvari; Yulun Wang; Yanick Beaulieu; Nadine Haram; Ashwin Sridhar; Jacques Marescaux; Michele Diana; Hani J Marcus; Jeffrey Levy; Prokar Dasgupta; Dimitrios Stefanidis; Martin Martino; Richard Feins; Vipul Patel; Mark Slack; Richard M Satava; John D Kelly
Journal:  Eur Urol Open Sci       Date:  2020-11-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.