Literature DB >> 11928017

Comparison of video trainer and virtual reality training systems on acquisition of laparoscopic skills.

E C Hamilton1, D J Scott, J B Fleming, R V Rege, R Laycock, P C Bergen, S T Tesfay, D B Jones.   

Abstract

Training on a video trainer or computer-based minimally invasive surgery trainer leads to improved benchtop laparoscopic skill. Recently, improved operative performance from practice on a video trainer was reported. The purpose of this study was three fold: (a) to compare psychomotor skill improvement after training on a virtual reality (VR) system with that after training on a video-trainer, (VT) (b) to evaluate whether skills learned on the one training system are transferable to the other, and (c) to evaluate whether VR or VT training improves operative performance. For the study, 50 junior surgery residents completed baseline skill testing on both the VR and VT systems. These subjects then were randomized to either a VR or VT structured training group. After practice, the subjects were tested again on their VR and VT skills. To assess the effect of practice on operative performance, all second-year residents (n = 19) were evaluated on their operative performance during a laparoscopic cholecystectomy before and after skill training. Data are expressed as percentage of improvement in mean score/time. Analysis was performed by Student's paired t-test. The VR training group showed improvement of 54% on the VR posttest, as compared with 55% improvement by the VT group. The VR training group improved more on the VT posttest tasks (36%) than the VT training group improved on the VR posttest tasks (17%) (p <0.05). Operative performance improved only in the VR training group (p <0.05). Psychomotor skills improve after training on both VR and VT, and skills may be transferable. Furthermore, training on a minimally invasive surgery trainer, virtual reality system may improve operative performance during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11928017     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-001-8149-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  59 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic skills training.

Authors:  L Villegas; B E Schneider; M P Callery; D B Jones
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-10-28       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Laparoscopic virtual reality and box trainers: is one superior to the other?

Authors:  Y Munz; B D Kumar; K Moorthy; S Bann; A Darzi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-02-02       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  A head-to-head comparison between virtual reality and physical reality simulation training for basic skills acquisition.

Authors:  Constantinos Loukas; Nikolaos Nikiteas; Dimitrios Schizas; Vasileios Lahanas; Evangelos Georgiou
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Proficiency-based training for robotic surgery: construct validity, workload, and expert levels for nine inanimate exercises.

Authors:  Genevieve Dulan; Robert V Rege; Deborah C Hogg; Kristine M Gilberg-Fisher; Nabeel A Arain; Seifu T Tesfay; Daniel J Scott
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Resident perceptions of advanced laparoscopic skills training.

Authors:  Vanessa N Palter; Neil Orzech; Rajesh Aggarwal; Allan Okrainec; Teodor P Grantcharov
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Simulation in surgical education.

Authors:  Vanessa N Palter; Teodor P Grantcharov
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  A randomized crossover trial examining low- versus high-fidelity simulation in basic laparoscopic skills training.

Authors:  Swee Chin Tan; Nicholas Marlow; John Field; Meryl Altree; Wendy Babidge; Peter Hewett; Guy J Maddern
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Telementoring versus on-site mentoring in virtual reality-based surgical training.

Authors:  L Panait; A Rafiq; V Tomulescu; C Boanca; I Popescu; A Carbonell; R C Merrell
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-10-24       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Consensus guidelines for validation of virtual reality surgical simulators.

Authors:  F J Carter; M P Schijven; R Aggarwal; T Grantcharov; N K Francis; G B Hanna; J J Jakimowicz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-10-26       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Physician competency? Teaching old dogs new tricks.

Authors:  Pierre-Alain Clavien; David L Nahrwold; Nathaniel J Soper; Barbara Lee Bass
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.