Literature DB >> 12184901

Training in laparoscopic suturing skills using a new computer-based virtual reality simulator (MIST-VR) provides results comparable to those with an established pelvic trainer system.

Shanu N Kothari1, Brian J Kaplan, Eric J DeMaria, Timothy J Broderick, Ronald C Merrell.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that the Minimally Invasive Surgery Trainer (MIST-VR; VP Medical R, London, U.K.) would be as effective as the Yale Laparoscopic Skills Course in improving laparoscopic intracorporeal suturing skills.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Each student made six attempts to tie a knot laparoscopically. Students were then randomized to train on the MIST-VR for five sessions (six skills/session) or the Yale Skills for five sessions (three skills/session) over 5 days. On completion of training, all students were evaluated by a test consisting of six attempts to tie a laparoscopic knot.
RESULTS: The percentage improvement in knot tying time did not differ significantly in the pelvic trainer group (30 +/- 21%) (from 443 +/- 135 to 311 +/- 137 seconds) and the MIST-VR group (39 +/- 21%) (from 409 +/- 109 to 256 +/- 140 seconds) (P = 0.308).
CONCLUSIONS: The MIST-VR is equivalent to the Yale Skills Course for training in the advanced laparoscopic skill of intracorporeal suturing.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12184901     DOI: 10.1089/10926420260188056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A        ISSN: 1092-6429            Impact factor:   1.878


  24 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic skills training.

Authors:  L Villegas; B E Schneider; M P Callery; D B Jones
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-10-28       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Simulation in surgical education.

Authors:  Vanessa N Palter; Teodor P Grantcharov
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  A randomized crossover trial examining low- versus high-fidelity simulation in basic laparoscopic skills training.

Authors:  Swee Chin Tan; Nicholas Marlow; John Field; Meryl Altree; Wendy Babidge; Peter Hewett; Guy J Maddern
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Construct validity for the LAPSIM laparoscopic surgical simulator.

Authors:  A J Duffy; N J Hogle; H McCarthy; J I Lew; A Egan; P Christos; D L Fowler
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-12-23       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Telementoring versus on-site mentoring in virtual reality-based surgical training.

Authors:  L Panait; A Rafiq; V Tomulescu; C Boanca; I Popescu; A Carbonell; R C Merrell
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-10-24       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Construct validation of the ProMIS simulator using a novel laparoscopic suturing task.

Authors:  K R Van Sickle; D A McClusky; A G Gallagher; C D Smith
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-07-21       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  A systematic review of the methodological quality and outcomes of RCTs to teach medical undergraduates surgical and emergency procedures.

Authors:  Roger E Thomas; Rodney Crutcher; Diane Lorenzetti
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.089

8.  Effectiveness of endoscopic surgery training for medical students using a virtual reality simulator versus a box trainer: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  K Tanoue; S Ieiri; K Konishi; T Yasunaga; K Okazaki; S Yamaguchi; D Yoshida; Y Kakeji; M Hashizume
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-08-19       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Telesurgery: windows of opportunity.

Authors:  Sulbha Arora; Gautam N Allahbadia
Journal:  Int J Health Sci (Qassim)       Date:  2007-01

Review 10.  A review of the role of simulation in developing and assessing orthopaedic surgical skills.

Authors:  Geb W Thomas; Brian D Johns; J Lawrence Marsh; Donald D Anderson
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2014
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.