Literature DB >> 11961623

Evaluation of structured and quantitative training methods for teaching intracorporeal knot tying.

A M Pearson1, A G Gallagher, J C Rosser, R M Satava.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the effectiveness of five training methods-four structured and one unstructured-for teaching intracorporeal knot tying.
METHODS: Forty-three graduate students without prior laparoscopic experience were randomly assigned to one of five training groups, and their performance in 10 intracorporeal knot tying trials was evaluated, using time to complete a knot as the outcome measure.
RESULTS: The average knot tying times for the four structured groups were significantly faster than the unstructured group (p < 0.0001). Among the four structured groups, the minimally invasive surgical trainer-virtually reality (MIST-VR) and the box trainer drills showed the most rapid improvements. The MIST-VR improved average suturing time from trial one to trial two (P = 0.05), the box trainer drills group improved from trial one to trial four (P = 0.01), and the other two groups showed slower improvements. Statistically significant correlations were observed between scores on MIST-VR tasks and average knottying times (R > 0.7, p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Structured training can be useful for the development of laparoscopic skills. MIST-VR is a valuable part of this training, particularly in the objective evaluation of performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11961623     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-001-8113-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  40 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic skills training.

Authors:  L Villegas; B E Schneider; M P Callery; D B Jones
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-10-28       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Short-term sleep deficits do not adversely affect acquisition of laparoscopic skills in a laboratory setting.

Authors:  A Jensen; R Milner; C Fisher; J Gaughan; R Rolandelli; H Grewal
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-04-21       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  A head-to-head comparison between virtual reality and physical reality simulation training for basic skills acquisition.

Authors:  Constantinos Loukas; Nikolaos Nikiteas; Dimitrios Schizas; Vasileios Lahanas; Evangelos Georgiou
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Simulation in surgical education.

Authors:  Vanessa N Palter; Teodor P Grantcharov
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  A randomized crossover trial examining low- versus high-fidelity simulation in basic laparoscopic skills training.

Authors:  Swee Chin Tan; Nicholas Marlow; John Field; Meryl Altree; Wendy Babidge; Peter Hewett; Guy J Maddern
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Self-directed training with e-learning using the first-person perspective for laparoscopic suturing and knot tying: a randomised controlled trial : Learning from the surgeon's real perspective.

Authors:  Mona W Schmidt; Karl-Friedrich Kowalewski; Sarah M Trent; Laura Benner; Beat P Müller-Stich; Felix Nickel
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Virtual reality simulation for the operating room: proficiency-based training as a paradigm shift in surgical skills training.

Authors:  Anthony G Gallagher; E Matt Ritter; Howard Champion; Gerald Higgins; Marvin P Fried; Gerald Moses; C Daniel Smith; Richard M Satava
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Telementoring versus on-site mentoring in virtual reality-based surgical training.

Authors:  L Panait; A Rafiq; V Tomulescu; C Boanca; I Popescu; A Carbonell; R C Merrell
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-10-24       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Cyber visual training as a new method for the mastery of endoscopic surgery.

Authors:  S Takiguchi; M Sekimoto; M Yasui; H Miyata; Y Fujiwara; T Yasuda; M Yano; M Monden
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-05-12       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Construct validation of the ProMIS simulator using a novel laparoscopic suturing task.

Authors:  K R Van Sickle; D A McClusky; A G Gallagher; C D Smith
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-07-21       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.