Literature DB >> 18529187

Speech detection in spatial and nonspatial speech maskers.

Uma Balakrishnan1, Richard L Freyman.   

Abstract

The effect of perceived spatial differences on masking release was examined using a 4AFC speech detection paradigm. Targets were 20 words produced by a female talker. Maskers were recordings of continuous streams of nonsense sentences spoken by two female talkers and mixed into each of two channels (two talker, and the same masker time reversed). Two masker spatial conditions were employed: "RF" with a 4 ms time lead to the loudspeaker 60 degrees horizontally to the right, and "FR" with the time lead to the front (0 degrees ) loudspeaker. The reference nonspatial "F" masker was presented from the front loudspeaker only. Target presentation was always from the front loudspeaker. In Experiment 1, target detection threshold for both natural and time-reversed spatial maskers was 17-20 dB lower than that for the nonspatial masker, suggesting that significant release from informational masking occurs with spatial speech maskers regardless of masker understandability. In Experiment 2, the effectiveness of the FR and RF maskers was evaluated as the right loudspeaker output was attenuated until the two-source maskers were indistinguishable from the F masker, as measured independently in a discrimination task. Results indicated that spatial release from masking can be observed with barely noticeable target-masker spatial differences.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18529187      PMCID: PMC2811546          DOI: 10.1121/1.2902176

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  40 in total

1.  Informational masking and musical training.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Brian J Fligor; Christine R Mason; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Cuing effects for informational masking.

Authors:  Virginia M Richards; Donna L Neff
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Effect of number of masking talkers and auditory priming on informational masking in speech recognition.

Authors:  Richard L Freyman; Uma Balakrishnan; Karen S Helfer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  The benefit of binaural hearing in a cocktail party: effect of location and type of interferer.

Authors:  Monica L Hawley; Ruth Y Litovsky; John F Culling
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  The advantage of knowing where to listen.

Authors:  Gerald Kidd; Tanya L Arbogast; Christine R Mason; Frederick J Gallun
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Factors in the discrimination of tonal patterns. II. Selective attention and learning under various levels of stimulus uncertainty.

Authors:  C S Watson; W J Kelly; H W Wroton
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Binaural interaction in low-frequency stimuli: the inability to trade time and intensity completely.

Authors:  E R Hafter; S C Carrier
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1972-06       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Two-image lateralization of tones and clicks.

Authors:  E R Hafter; L A Jeffress
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1968-08       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics.

Authors:  H Levitt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1971-02       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Perceptual masking in multiple sound backgrounds.

Authors:  R Carhart; T W Tillman; E S Greetis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1969-03       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  12 in total

1.  Individual differences and age effects in a dichotic informational masking paradigm.

Authors:  Frederic L Wightman; Doris J Kistler; Amanda O'Bryan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Spatial release from masking with noise-vocoded speech.

Authors:  Richard L Freyman; Uma Balakrishnan; Karen S Helfer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Role of masker predictability in the cocktail party problem.

Authors:  Gary L Jones; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Lexical and indexical cues in masking by competing speech.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Richard L Freyman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Speech localization in a multitalker mixture.

Authors:  Norbert Kopco; Virginia Best; Simon Carlile
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  A cocktail party model of spatial release from masking by both noise and speech interferers.

Authors:  Gary L Jones; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Informational masking and spatial hearing in listeners with and without unilateral hearing loss.

Authors:  Ann M Rothpletz; Frederic L Wightman; Doris J Kistler
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Factors Affecting Speech Reception in Background Noise with a Vocoder Implementation of the FAST Algorithm.

Authors:  Shaikat Hossain; Raymond L Goldsworthy
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-05-09

9.  Mechanisms of Localization and Speech Perception with Colocated and Spatially Separated Noise and Speech Maskers Under Single-Sided Deafness with a Cochlear Implant.

Authors:  Coral Dirks; Peggy B Nelson; Douglas P Sladen; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Linking anatomical and physiological markers of auditory system degeneration with behavioral hearing assessments in a mouse (Mus musculus) model of age-related hearing loss.

Authors:  Anastasiya Kobrina; Katrina M Schrode; Laurel A Screven; Hamad Javaid; Madison M Weinberg; Garrett Brown; Ryleigh Board; Dillan F Villavisanis; Micheal L Dent; Amanda M Lauer
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 4.673

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.