Literature DB >> 3797646

Excretory urography using computed radiography.

L L Fajardo, B J Hillman, T B Hunter, H R Claypool, B R Westerman, B Mockbee.   

Abstract

A computed radiographic system for generating digital film images was evaluated in the performance of excretory urography. Three experienced radiologists reviewed digital and conventional screen-film urograms for 100 patients in a prospective study to evaluate the clinical utility of the digital system. Results indicate no difference between digital and screen-film urograms in diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, or receiver-operating-characteristic curves for differentiating normal from abnormal studies. Readers' performances in making specific diagnoses were also the same with both techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3797646     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.162.2.3797646

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  8 in total

1.  Comparison of computerized digital and film-screen radiography: response to variation in imaging kVp.

Authors:  N J Broderick; B Long; R G Dreesen; M D Cohen; D A Cory; B P Katz; L A Kalasinski
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  1992

Review 2.  Literature review: picture archiving and communication system.

Authors:  U P Schmiedl; A H Rowberg
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Evaluation of teleradiology for interpretation of intravenous urograms.

Authors:  E J Halpern; J H Newhouse; E S Amis; H W Lubetsky; R M Jaffe; P D Esser; P O Alderson
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Digital image analysis of radio-opacities in the paranasal sinuses using computed radiography.

Authors:  H Suzaki; K Abbey; Y Nomura
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  The digital imaging workstation. 1990.

Authors:  Ronald L Arenson; Dev P Chakraborty; Sridhar B Seshadri; Harold L Kundel
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Clinical assessment of phosphor-plate computed radiography: equipment, strategy, and methods.

Authors:  B J Hillman; L L Fajardo
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  Modeling the performance characteristics of computed radiography (CR) systems.

Authors:  Srinivasan Vedantham; Andrew Karellas
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 10.048

8.  Computed radiography excretory urography: can the system sensitivity value be used as an image quality indicator?

Authors:  K Andoh; K Odagiri; T Matsumoto; K Yamashita; I Ogino; T Otsuka
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.056

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.