Literature DB >> 2783807

Digital skeletal radiography: spatial resolution requirements for detection of subperiosteal resorption.

M D Murphey1.   

Abstract

Forty direct-magnification (2:1 enlargement) radiographs showing various severities of subperiosteal resorption and 40 normal studies were selected and digitized. Images were processed to produce varying resolution, from 1.42 to 11.4 Ip/mm, corresponding to pixel sizes ranging from 0.04 to 0.32 mm. The conventional and digitized images were evaluated by six radiologists giving their decision confidence on a graded scale. Receiver operating characteristic analyses were performed from these data to compare the digital images with the conventional films. The results show significant improvement in diagnostic accuracy as pixel size decreases to the level of 0.08 mm. Digital images with pixel sizes of 0.04 mm (11.4 Ip/mm) were not significantly different from the magnification radiographs in terms of observer performance. In conclusion, for high-resolution skeletal imaging as needed for detection of subperiosteal resorption, spatial resolution of 5.7 Ip/mm or less resulted in a significant loss of diagnostic accuracy, as compared with conventional films.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2783807     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.152.3.541

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  11 in total

Review 1.  Literature review: picture archiving and communication system.

Authors:  U P Schmiedl; A H Rowberg
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Hardware and software requirements for a picture archiving and communication system's diagnostic workstations.

Authors:  D R Haynor; D V Smith; H W Park; Y Kim
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Evaluation of teleradiology for interpretation of intravenous urograms.

Authors:  E J Halpern; J H Newhouse; E S Amis; H W Lubetsky; R M Jaffe; P D Esser; P O Alderson
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  The digital imaging workstation. 1990.

Authors:  Ronald L Arenson; Dev P Chakraborty; Sridhar B Seshadri; Harold L Kundel
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Clinical evaluation of irreversible data compression for computed radiography of the hand.

Authors:  K Uchida; H Watanabe; T Aoki; K Nakamura; H Nakata
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Subjective quality assessment of computed radiography hand images.

Authors:  C A Britton; O F Gabriele; T S Chang; J D Towers; D A Rubin; W F Good; D Gur
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  Diagnostic accuracy in remote expert consultation using standard video-conference technology.

Authors:  M Krause; M Brado; R Schosser; F R Bartsch; M Gerneth; G Kauffmann
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Musculoskeletal computed radiography in children: scatter reduction and improvement in bony trabecular sharpness using air gap placement of the imaging plate.

Authors:  S R Kottamasu; L R Kuhns
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  1997-02

9.  Digital skeletal radiography.

Authors:  H Pettersson
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.056

10.  Report on a new type of trauma full-body digital X-ray machine.

Authors:  S Beningfield; H Potgieter; A Nicol; S van As; G Bowie; E Hering; E Lätti
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2003-04-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.