Literature DB >> 16193798

Performance characterization of megavoltage computed tomography imaging on a helical tomotherapy unit.

Sanford L Meeks1, Joseph F Harmon, Katja M Langen, Twyla R Willoughby, Thomas H Wagner, Patrick A Kupelian.   

Abstract

Helical tomotherapy is an innovative means of delivering IGRT and IMRT using a device that combines features of a linear accelerator and a helical computed tomography (CT) scanner. The HI-ART II can generate CT images from the same megavoltage x-ray beam it uses for treatment. These megavoltage CT (MVCT) images offer verification of the patient position prior to and potentially during radiation therapy. Since the unit uses the actual treatment beam as the x-ray source for image acquisition, no surrogate telemetry systems are required to register image space to treatment space. The disadvantage to using the treatment beam for imaging, however, is that the physics of radiation interactions in the megavoltage energy range may force compromises between the dose delivered and the image quality in comparison to diagnostic CT scanners. The performance of the system is therefore characterized in terms of objective measures of noise, uniformity, contrast, and spatial resolution as a function of the dose delivered by the MVCT beam. The uniformity and spatial resolutions of MVCT images generated by the HI-ART II are comparable to that of diagnostic CT images. Furthermore, the MVCT scan contrast is linear with respect to the electron density of material imaged. MVCT images do not have the same performance characteristics as state-of-the art diagnostic CT scanners when one objectively examines noise and low-contrast resolution. These inferior results may be explained, at least partially, by the low doses delivered by our unit; the dose is 1.1 cGy in a 20 cm diameter cylindrical phantom. In spite of the poorer low-contrast resolution, these relatively low-dose MVCT scans provide sufficient contrast to delineate many soft-tissue structures. Hence, these images are useful not only for verifying the patient's position at the time of therapy, but they are also sufficient for delineating many anatomic structures. In conjunction with the ability to recalculate radiotherapy doses on these images, this enables dose guidance as well as image guidance of radiotherapy treatments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16193798     DOI: 10.1118/1.1990289

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  47 in total

1.  Monte Carlo modeling of ultrasound probes for image guided radiotherapy.

Authors:  Magdalena Bazalova-Carter; Jeffrey Schlosser; Josephine Chen; Dimitre Hristov
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Influence of the type of imaging on the delineation process during the treatment planning.

Authors:  Weronika Jackowiak; Bartosz Bąk; Anna Kowalik; Adam Ryczkowski; Małgorzata Skórska; Małgorzata Paszek-Widzińska
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2015-06-18

3.  Super-resolution imaging in a multiple layer EPID.

Authors:  Haijian Chen; Joerg Rottmann; Stephen Sf Yip; Daniel Morf; Rony Füglistaller; Josh Star-Lack; George Zentai; Ross Berbeco
Journal:  Biomed Phys Eng Express       Date:  2017-02-21

4.  Intrafractional motion of the prostate during hypofractionated radiotherapy.

Authors:  Yaoqin Xie; David Djajaputra; Christopher R King; Sabbir Hossain; Lijun Ma; Lei Xing
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008-09-01       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Deformable registration of abdominal kilovoltage treatment planning CT and tomotherapy daily megavoltage CT for treatment adaptation.

Authors:  Deshan Yang; Summer R Chaudhari; S Murty Goddu; David Pratt; Divya Khullar; Joseph O Deasy; Issam El Naqa
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Effect of magnesium oxide on interfraction prostate motion and rectal filling in prostate cancer radiotherapy: analysis of a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Annemarie M den Harder; Carla H van Gils; Alexis N T J Kotte; Marco van Vulpen; Irene M Lips
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 3.621

7.  Megavoltage CT imaging quality improvement on TomoTherapy via tensor framelet.

Authors:  Hao Gao; X Sharon Qi; Yu Gao; Daniel A Low
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  [Quantitative evaluation of image quality of megavoltage computed tomography for guiding helical tomotherapy].

Authors:  Y L Huang; C G Li; K Mao; J A Wu; T T Dai; Y Y Han; H Wu; H Y Wang; Y B Zhang
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2019-06-18

9.  Volumetric modulated arc therapy for prostate cancer patients with hip prosthesis.

Authors:  Ramachandran Prabhakar; Milind Kumar; Suja Cheruliyil; Silpa Jayakumar; Satheesan Balasubramanian; Jim Cramb
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2013-04-28

10.  A piecewise-focused high DQE detector for MV imaging.

Authors:  Josh Star-Lack; Daniel Shedlock; Dennis Swahn; Dave Humber; Adam Wang; Hayley Hirsh; George Zentai; Daren Sawkey; Isaac Kruger; Mingshan Sun; Eric Abel; Gary Virshup; Mihye Shin; Rebecca Fahrig
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 4.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.