OBJECTIVES: To develop and evaluate a web-based curriculum to introduce first year medical students to the knowledge and attitudes necessary for working with limited English proficient (LEP) patients through interpreters. METHOD: Six hundred and forty first year medical students over 4 consecutive years took this curriculum as part of their Patient Physician and Society course. They viewed 6 patient-physician-interpreter video vignettes, gave open text analyses of each vignette, and compared their responses to those generated by experts, thereby receiving immediate formative feedback. They listened to video commentaries by a cultural expert, lawyer, and ethicist about working with LEP patients, completed pre- and postmodule questionnaires, which tested relevant knowledge and attitudes, and were provided a summative assessment at the end of the module. Students completed an optional survey assessing the educational value of, and providing open text commentary about, the module. RESULTS: Seventy-one percent (n=456) of first year students who completed the module consented to have their data included in this evaluation. Mean knowledge (19 items) scores improved (46% pre- to 62% postmodule, P<.001), reflecting improvements in knowledge about best interpreter practices and immigration demographics and legal issues. Mean scores on 4 of 5 attitude items improved, reflecting attitudes more consistent with culturally sensitive care of LEP patients. Mean satisfaction with the educational value of the module for 155 students who completed the postmodule survey was 2.9 on a scale of 1 to 4. CONCLUSION: Our web-curriculum resulted in short-term improvement in the knowledge and attitudes necessary to interact with LEP patients and interpreters. The interactive format allowed students to receive immediate formative feedback and be cognizant of the challenges and effective strategies in language discordant medical encounters. This is important because studies suggest that the use of these skills in patient encounters leads to greater patient and provider satisfaction and improved health outcomes.
OBJECTIVES: To develop and evaluate a web-based curriculum to introduce first year medical students to the knowledge and attitudes necessary for working with limited English proficient (LEP) patients through interpreters. METHOD: Six hundred and forty first year medical students over 4 consecutive years took this curriculum as part of their Patient Physician and Society course. They viewed 6 patient-physician-interpreter video vignettes, gave open text analyses of each vignette, and compared their responses to those generated by experts, thereby receiving immediate formative feedback. They listened to video commentaries by a cultural expert, lawyer, and ethicist about working with LEP patients, completed pre- and postmodule questionnaires, which tested relevant knowledge and attitudes, and were provided a summative assessment at the end of the module. Students completed an optional survey assessing the educational value of, and providing open text commentary about, the module. RESULTS: Seventy-one percent (n=456) of first year students who completed the module consented to have their data included in this evaluation. Mean knowledge (19 items) scores improved (46% pre- to 62% postmodule, P<.001), reflecting improvements in knowledge about best interpreter practices and immigration demographics and legal issues. Mean scores on 4 of 5 attitude items improved, reflecting attitudes more consistent with culturally sensitive care of LEP patients. Mean satisfaction with the educational value of the module for 155 students who completed the postmodule survey was 2.9 on a scale of 1 to 4. CONCLUSION: Our web-curriculum resulted in short-term improvement in the knowledge and attitudes necessary to interact with LEP patients and interpreters. The interactive format allowed students to receive immediate formative feedback and be cognizant of the challenges and effective strategies in language discordant medical encounters. This is important because studies suggest that the use of these skills in patient encounters leads to greater patient and provider satisfaction and improved health outcomes.
Authors: Michael J Yedidia; Colleen C Gillespie; Elizabeth Kachur; Mark D Schwartz; Judith Ockene; Amy E Chepaitis; Clint W Snyder; Aaron Lazare; Mack Lipkin Journal: JAMA Date: 2003-09-03 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Quyen Ngo-Metzger; Michael P Massagli; Brian R Clarridge; Michael Manocchia; Roger B Davis; Lisa I Iezzoni; Russell S Phillips Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Sylvia Bereknyei; Andrew Nevins; Erika Schillinger; Ronald D Garcia; A Elizabeth Stuart; Clarence H Braddock Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Mohamed H Emara; Mariam Zaghloul; Haidi Karam-Allah Ramadan; Salem Youssef Mohamed; Mohammed Tag-Adeen; Ahmed Alzamzamy; Mohamed Alboraie; Ahmad Madkour; Ahmed Youssef Altonbary; Tarik I Zaher; Ahmed Abo Elhassan; Nermeen Abdeen; Mohammed Hussien Ahmed Journal: World J Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2022-04-16
Authors: Patricia A Carney; Ryan T Palmer; Marissa Fuqua Miller; Erin K Thayer; Sue E Estroff; Debra K Litzelman; Frances E Biagioli; Cayla R Teal; Ann Lambros; William J Hatt; Jason M Satterfield Journal: Acad Med Date: 2016-05 Impact factor: 6.893
Authors: Nancy N Maserejian; Michael A Fischer; Felicia L Trachtenberg; Jing Yu; Lisa D Marceau; John B McKinlay; Jeffrey N Katz Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Alvaro F Vargas Pelaez; Sarah I Ramirez; Chavely Valdes Sanchez; Shady Piedra Abusharar; Jose C Romeu; Connor Carmichael; Soraya Bascoy; Rose Baron; Ariana Pichardo-Lowden; Nathalia Albarracin; Claire C Jones; Patricia Silveyra Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2018-06-18 Impact factor: 2.463
Authors: Jessica Jones; Kerrilynn Rice; Victor Cueto; Coralee Del Valle Mojica; Meghan Stawitcke; Sara Salem; Elizabeth Talley; Rebecca Blankenburg Journal: MedEdPORTAL Date: 2020-11-09