Literature DB >> 16162627

Valve replacement in patients with critical aortic stenosis and depressed left ventricular function: predictors of operative risk, left ventricular function recovery, and long term outcome.

B Vaquette1, H Corbineau, M Laurent, B Lelong, T Langanay, C de Place, C Froger-Bompas, C Leclercq, C Daubert, A Leguerrier.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To identify predictors of operative and postoperative mortality and of functional reversibility after aortic valve replacement (AVR) in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) and severe left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Between 1990 and 2000, 155 consecutive patients (mean (SD) age 72 (9) years) in New York Heart Association (NYHA) heart failure functional class III or IV (n = 138) and with LV ejection fraction (LVEF) < or = 30% underwent AVR for critical AS (mean (SD) valve area index 0.35 (0.09) cm2/m2). Thirty day mortality was 12%. NYHA class (3.7 (0.6) v 3.2 (0.7), p = 0.004), cardiothoracic ratio (CTR) (0.63 (0.07) v 0.56 (0.06), p < 0.0001), pulmonary artery systolic pressure (63 (25) v 50 (19) mm Hg, p = 0.03), and prevalence of complete left bundle branch block (22% v 8%, p = 0.03) and of renal insufficiency (p = 0.001) were significantly higher in 18 non-survivors than in 137 survivors. In multivariate analysis, the only independent predictor of operative mortality was a CTR > or = 0.6 (odds ratio (OR) 12.2, 95% confidence interval (CI) 5.4 to 27.4, p = 0.002). The difference between preoperative and immediate postoperative LVEF (early-DeltaEF) was > 10 ejection fraction units (EFU) in 55 survivors. In multivariate analysis, CTR (OR 5.95, 95% CI 3.0 to 11.6, p = 0.006) and mean transaortic gradient (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.0 to 1.1, p < 0.05) were independent predictors of an early-DeltaEF > 10 EFU. During a mean (SD) follow up of 4.6 (3) years, 50 of 137 (36%) 30 day survivors died, 31 of non-cardiac causes. Diabetes (OR 3.8, 95% CI 2.4 to 6.0, p = 0.003), age > or = 75 years (OR 2.6, 95% CI 2.1 to 4.5, p = 0.004), and early-DeltaEF < or = 10 EFU (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.94 to 0.97, p = 0.01) were independent predictors of long term mortality. Among 127 survivors, the percentage of patients in NYHA functional class III or IV decreased from 89% preoperatively to 3% at one year. The decrease in functional class was significantly greater in patients with an early-DeltaEF > 10 EFU than patients with an early-DeltaEF < or = 10 EFU (p = 0.02). In addition, the mean (SD) LVEF at one year was 53 (11)% in patients with an early-DeltaEF > 10 EFU and 42 (11)% in patients with early-DeltaEF < or = 10 EFU (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Despite a relatively high operative mortality, AVR for AS and severely depressed LVEF was beneficial in the majority of patients. Early postoperative recovery of LV function was associated with significantly greater relief of symptoms and longer survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16162627      PMCID: PMC1769144          DOI: 10.1136/hrt.2004.044099

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart        ISSN: 1355-6037            Impact factor:   5.994


  25 in total

Review 1.  Recommendations for quantitation of the left ventricle by two-dimensional echocardiography. American Society of Echocardiography Committee on Standards, Subcommittee on Quantitation of Two-Dimensional Echocardiograms.

Authors:  N B Schiller; P M Shah; M Crawford; A DeMaria; R Devereux; H Feigenbaum; H Gutgesell; N Reichek; D Sahn; I Schnittger
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  1989 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.251

2.  Two-dimensional echocardiographic measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction: prospective analysis of what constitutes an adequate determination.

Authors:  R B Stamm; B A Carabello; D L Mayers; R P Martin
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 4.749

3.  Preoperative identification of patients likely to have left ventricular dysfunction after aortic valve replacement. Participants in the Veterans Administration Cooperative Study on Valvular Heart Disease.

Authors:  M H Hwang; K E Hammermeister; C Oprian; W Henderson; G Bousvaros; M Wong; D C Miller; E Folland; G Sethi
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 4.  The natural history of aortic valve stenosis.

Authors:  D Horstkotte; F Loogen
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 29.983

5.  Prognosis after valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis and a low transvalvular pressure gradient.

Authors:  W C Brogan; P A Grayburn; R A Lange; L D Hillis
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Reproducibility of left ventricular volumes by two-dimensional echocardiography.

Authors:  E P Gordon; I Schnittger; P J Fitzgerald; P Williams; R L Popp
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Surgery for aortic stenosis in elderly patients. A study of surgical risk and predictive factors.

Authors:  Y Logeais; T Langanay; R Roussin; A Leguerrier; C Rioux; J Chaperon; C de Place; P Mabo; J C Pony; J C Daubert
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Prevalence of aortic valve abnormalities in the elderly: an echocardiographic study of a random population sample.

Authors:  M Lindroos; M Kupari; J Heikkilä; R Tilvis
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Preoperative risk evaluation and stratification of long-term survival after valve replacement for aortic stenosis. Reasons for earlier operative intervention.

Authors:  O Lund
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 10.  Afterload mismatch in aortic and mitral valve disease: implications for surgical therapy.

Authors:  J Ross
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  23 in total

Review 1.  Which strategy for a protein crystallization project?

Authors:  C E Kundrot
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 9.261

2.  What influences the outcome of valve replacement in critical aortic stenosis?

Authors:  H Baumgartner
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 3.  Low-gradient aortic valve stenosis: value and limitations of dobutamine stress testing.

Authors:  J Bermejo; R Yotti
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2006-04-18       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  Invasive hemodynamic assessments during transcatheter aortic valve implantation: comparison of patient outcomes in higher vs. lower transvalvular gradients with respect to left ventricular ejection fraction.

Authors:  Jury Schewel; Dimitry Schewel; Christian Frerker; Peter Wohlmuth; Karl-Heinz Kuck; Ulrich Schäfer
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 5.460

5.  Exercise stress echocardiography in patients with aortic stenosis: impact of baseline diastolic dysfunction and functional capacity on mortality and aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Andrew N Rassi; Wael Aljaroudi; Sahar Naderi; M Chadi Alraies; Venu Menon; Leonardo Rodriguez; Richard Grimm; Brian Griffin; Wael A Jaber
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2013-12

6.  Outcomes From Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis and Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Less Than 30%: A Substudy From the TOPAS-TAVI Registry.

Authors:  Frédéric Maes; Stamatios Lerakis; Henrique Barbosa Ribeiro; Martine Gilard; João L Cavalcante; Raj Makkar; Howard C Herrmann; Stephan Windecker; Maurice Enriquez-Sarano; Asim N Cheema; Luis Nombela-Franco; Ignacio Amat-Santos; Antonio J Muñoz-García; Bruno Garcia Del Blanco; Alan Zajarias; John C Lisko; Salim Hayek; Vasilis Babaliaros; Florent Le Ven; Thomas G Gleason; Tarun Chakravarty; Wilson Szeto; Marie-Annick Clavel; Alberto de Agustin; Vicenç Serra; John T Schindler; Abdellaziz Dahou; Mohammed Salah-Annabi; Emilie Pelletier-Beaumont; Melanie Côté; Rishi Puri; Philippe Pibarot; Josep Rodés-Cabau
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 14.676

7.  Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with severely reduced left ventricular systolic function: a single-center experience.

Authors:  Mohamed El-Mawardy; Nora Wübken-Kleinfeld; Bettina Schwarz; Ken Gordian; Björn Stöcker; Holger Sier; Ralph Toelg; Volker Geist; Ernst-Günther Kraatz; Gert Richardt; Mohamed Abdel-Wahab
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 5.460

8.  Improving risk assessment for post-surgical low cardiac output syndrome in patients without severely reduced ejection fraction undergoing open aortic valve replacement. The role of global longitudinal strain and right ventricular free wall strain.

Authors:  K Balderas-Muñoz; H Rodríguez-Zanella; J F Fritche-Salazar; N Ávila-Vanzzini; L E Juárez Orozco; J A Arias-Godínez; O Calvillo-Argüelles; S Rivera-Peralta; J C Sauza-Sosa; M E Ruiz-Esparza; E Bucio-Reta; A Rómero; N Espinola-Zavaleta; B Domínguez-Mendez; M Gaxiola-Macias; M A Martínez-Ríos
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 9.  [Transcatheter-based aortic valve implantation. Present and future technologies].

Authors:  Stefan Sack; Joachim Schofer
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.443

10.  Surgical outcomes and post-operative changes in patients with significant aortic stenosis and severe left ventricle dysfunction.

Authors:  Sung-Ho Jung; Jae Won Lee; Hyung Gon Je; Suk Jung Choo; Cheol Hyun Chung; Hyun Song
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 2.153

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.