Literature DB >> 2364510

Preoperative risk evaluation and stratification of long-term survival after valve replacement for aortic stenosis. Reasons for earlier operative intervention.

O Lund1.   

Abstract

Predictability of prognosis was analyzed in 630 patients who were alive 30 days after valve replacement (1965-1986) for aortic stenosis. Follow-up totaled 4,072 patient-years. During the operative periods of 1965-1971 (n = 62), 1972-1976 (n = 164), 1977-1981 (n = 158), and 1982-1986 (n = 246), decreases in cardiothoracic index (0.56 +/- 0.06, 0.53 +/- 0.06, 0.52 +/- 0.06, and 0.51 +/- 0.06; p less than 0.0001), in the prevalence of functional classes III and IV (87%, 76%, 68%, and 62%; p less than 0.0001), and of left ventricular (50%, 39%, 36%, and 30%; p less than 0.05) were accompanied by improved survival (5 year/10 year +/- SE: 73 +/- 6%/53 +/- 6%, 82 +/- 3%/65 +/- 4%, 89 +/- 3%/79 +/- 4%, and 87 +/- 3%/-; p = 0.002) despite increasing age (56 +/- 9, 57 +/- 11, 59 +/- 10, and 61 +/- 11 years; p less than 0.01). A Cox regression analysis identified peak-to-peak systolic gradient (p = 0.0001; inversely related to death rate), cardiothoracic index (p = 0.0003), left ventricular failure (p = 0.0005), prosthetic orifice diameter of 15 mm or less (p = 0.001), age (p = 0.003), ventricular ectopic beats (p = 0.004), male gender (p = 0.03), and antianginal/antiarrhythmic treatment (p = 0.03) as independent risk factors. A prognostic index calculated from the final Cox model stratified the patients into eight risk groups, having observed +/- SE/predicted/expected (matched background population) 10-year survival rates of 90 +/- 7% (n = 29)/94%/91%, 84 +/- 6% (n = 61)/89%/87%, 86 +/- 3% (n = 105)/83%/81%, 75 +/- 4% (n = 165)/75%/77%, 62 +/- 6% (n = 128)/63%/74%, 51 +/- 8% (n = 84)/47%/71%, 29 +/- 9% (n = 40)/31%/67%, and 16 +/- 9% (n = 18)/14%/54% (p less than 0.000001/-/-). Excess mortality relative to the background populations prevailed predominantly in risk groups 5-8 and was mainly caused by congestive heart failure. Thus, improved long-term survival during the 22-year operative period was related to improved preoperative patient status. Earlier operation (= low prognostic index) inferred a survival rate comparable to that of a matched background population. The prognostic index was probably predominantly related to preoperative myocardial damage that caused late predictable death from congestive heart failure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2364510     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.82.1.124

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  43 in total

1.  To operate or not on elderly patients with aortic stenosis: the decision and its consequences.

Authors:  B J Bouma; R B van Den Brink; J H van Der Meulen; H A Verheul; E C Cheriex; H P Hamer; E Dekker; K I Lie; J G Tijssen
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Myocardial fibrosis in severe aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Wendy Tsang; Roberto M Lang
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Regression of left ventricular mass after implantation of the sutureless 3f Enable aortic bioprosthesis.

Authors:  Giovanni Concistrè; Antonio Miceli; Federica Marchi; Francesca Chiaramonti; Mattia Glauber; Marco Solinas
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2015-04-01

4.  What influences the outcome of valve replacement in critical aortic stenosis?

Authors:  H Baumgartner
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  Left ventricular mass regression after sutureless implantation of the Perceval S aortic valve bioprosthesis: preliminary results.

Authors:  Giuseppe Santarpino; Steffen Pfeiffer; Francesco Pollari; Giovanni Concistrè; Ferdinand Vogt; Theodor Fischlein
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-10-08

Review 6.  [Modern aspects in the management of acquired heart valve lesions].

Authors:  D Horstkotte; H P Schultheiss
Journal:  Herz       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 7.  Management of asymptomatic aortic stenosis: masterly inactivity but cat-like observation.

Authors:  J C Vaile; M J Griffith
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 5.994

8.  Variability in treatment advice for elderly patients with aortic stenosis: a nationwide survey in The Netherlands.

Authors:  B J Bouma; J H van der Meulen; R B van den Brink; A E Arnold; A Smidts; L H Teunter; K I Lie; J G Tijssen
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 9.  Valve disease: Surgery of valve disease: late results and late complications.

Authors:  P Groves
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.994

10.  [The "asymptomatic" patient with chronic acquired heart valve disease].

Authors:  D Horstkotte; C Prinz; C Piper
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 0.743

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.