Literature DB >> 3042404

The natural history of aortic valve stenosis.

D Horstkotte1, F Loogen.   

Abstract

Despite different aetiologies, acquired aortic stenosis is a self-maintaining, slowly progressive process with good long-term prognosis. In 142 patients with mild stenosis, there was clinical progression within 10 years of the initial diagnosis in only 12% of patients. Twenty-five years after the diagnosis had been established, the severity of aortic stenosis was clinically unchanged in 38%, while 25% of patients had moderate stenosis and 35% had undergone valve replacement. Progression of moderate aortic stenosis was more rapid: the average time interval between the manifestation of moderate aortic stenosis and surgery was 13.4 years. Age at the onset of initial symptoms was related to aetiology: 39 +/- 18 years with rheumatic aortic stenoses, 48 +/- 6 years in patients with bicuspid valves who had no history of rheumatic fever, infective endocarditis or myocarditis, and 66 +/- 12 years in degenerative, calcific stenoses of tricuspid aortic valves. Patients with haemodynamically severe stenosis who had refused the recommended operation (n = 55) had an overall poor prognosis: mean survival averaged 23 +/- 5 months and the five-year probability of survival was 18 +/- 7%. All these patients died within 12 years of observation. Mean survival after the occurrence of angina pectoris was 45 +/- 13 months, after syncope 27 +/- 15 months, and after first occurrence of left heart failure 11 +/- 10 months.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3042404     DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/9.suppl_e.57

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  64 in total

Review 1.  Should patients with asymptomatic mild or moderate aortic stenosis undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery also have valve replacement for their aortic stenosis?

Authors:  S H Rahimtoola
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 2.  Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: evidence on safety and efficacy compared with medical therapy. A systematic review of current literature.

Authors:  L Figulla; A Neumann; H R Figulla; P Kahlert; R Erbel; T Neumann
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2010-12-17       Impact factor: 5.460

3.  Incremental prognostic role of left atrial reservoir strain in asymptomatic patients with moderate aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Andrea Sonaglioni; Gian Luigi Nicolosi; Elisabetta Rigamonti; Michele Lombardo
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Aortic stenosis.

Authors:  John Chambers
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-04-09

5.  What influences the outcome of valve replacement in critical aortic stenosis?

Authors:  H Baumgartner
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.994

6.  Bicuspid aortic valve.

Authors:  D Horstkotte
Journal:  Z Kardiol       Date:  2005-07

Review 7.  Surgical aspects of congestive heart failure.

Authors:  Daniel J Goldstein; Douglas Smego; Robert E Michler
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.214

8.  T lymphocyte infiltration in non-rheumatic aortic stenosis: a comparative descriptive study between tricuspid and bicuspid aortic valves.

Authors:  L Wallby; B Janerot-Sjöberg; T Steffensen; M Broqvist
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.994

9.  [The "asymptomatic" patient with chronic acquired heart valve disease].

Authors:  D Horstkotte; C Prinz; C Piper
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 0.743

10.  Selection of prosthetic heart valves.

Authors:  Robert P Gallegos
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2006-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.