Literature DB >> 2670330

Preoperative identification of patients likely to have left ventricular dysfunction after aortic valve replacement. Participants in the Veterans Administration Cooperative Study on Valvular Heart Disease.

M H Hwang1, K E Hammermeister, C Oprian, W Henderson, G Bousvaros, M Wong, D C Miller, E Folland, G Sethi.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify preoperative and intraoperative variables predictive of left ventricular dysfunction 6 months after aortic valve replacement. Patients were considered to have postoperative left ventricular dysfunction if the end-diastolic-volume index was greater than or equal to 101 ml/m2 or if the ejection fraction was less than or equal to 0.50. Data from 180 patients entered into the Veterans Administration Cooperative Study on Valvular Heart Disease who had technically satisfactory cardiac catheterizations 6 months postoperatively were analyzed by a series of univariate and multivariate analyses. For the 88 patients with preoperative aortic stenosis, the most powerful predictor of postoperative left ventricular dysfunction in the final multivariate model was preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction (p = 0.0001), followed by preoperative myocardial infarction (p = 0.012), aortic valve gradient (p = 0.020), and incomplete coronary revascularization (p = 0.059). Abnormal preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction had a sensitivity of 72% and a specificity of 82% in identifying patients with postoperative left ventricular dysfunction. Preoperative left ventricular systolic-volume index greater than or equal to 40 ml/m2 had a similar sensitivity and specificity (79% and 84%, respectively). For the 36 patients with aortic regurgitation, preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction was again the most powerful predictor of postoperative left ventricular dysfunction (p = 0.013), followed by left ventricular systolic pressure (p = 0.038) and arteriovenous oxygen difference (p = 0.054). For the 56 patients with mixed aortic stenosis and regurgitation, left ventricular systolic pressure (p = 0.007) and preoperative myocardial infarction (p = 0.022) were the variables predictive of postoperative left ventricular dysfunction. Although many patients with preoperative left ventricular dysfunction experience improved left ventricular performance after aortic valve replacement, performance does not always return to normal. For patients with either aortic stenosis or regurgitation, the strongest predictor of postoperative left ventricular dysfunction is preoperative dysfunction. These data support the concept that patients with moderate or severe aortic stenosis or regurgitation should be operated on before the onset of significant left ventricular dysfunction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2670330

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  10 in total

1.  Left ventricular function-conduction impairment as reflected by the ECG in chronic aortic regurgitation.

Authors:  Siegfried H Recke
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 1.704

2.  Long axis excursion in aortic stenosis.

Authors:  S Takeda; H Rimington; N Smeeton; J Chambers
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Aortic valve surgery and survival in patients with moderate or severe aortic stenosis and left ventricular dysfunction.

Authors:  Zainab Samad; Amit N Vora; Allison Dunning; Phillip J Schulte; Linda K Shaw; Fawaz Al-Enezi; Mads Ersboll; Robert W McGarrah; John P Vavalle; Svati H Shah; Joseph Kisslo; Donald Glower; J Kevin Harrison; Eric J Velazquez
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 4.  One problem two issues! Left ventricular systolic and diastolic dysfunction in aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Maqsood M Elahi; Anthony Chuang; Michael J Ewing; Charles H Choi; Peter W Grant; Bashir M Matata
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2014-01

5.  Valve replacement in patients with critical aortic stenosis and depressed left ventricular function: predictors of operative risk, left ventricular function recovery, and long term outcome.

Authors:  B Vaquette; H Corbineau; M Laurent; B Lelong; T Langanay; C de Place; C Froger-Bompas; C Leclercq; C Daubert; A Leguerrier
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.994

6.  Mass reduction and functional improvement of the left ventricle after aortic valve replacement for degenerative aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Sumin Shin; Pyo Won Park; Woo-Sik Han; Ki Ick Sung; Wook Sung Kim; Young Tak Lee
Journal:  Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2011-12-07

7.  Impact of concomitant aortic regurgitation on long-term outcome after surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Suad Catovic; Zoran B Popovic; Nebojsa Tasic; Dusko Nezic; Predrag Milojevic; Bosko Djukanovic; Sinisa Gradinac; Lazar Angelkov; Petar Otasevic
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 1.637

8.  Impact of Coronary Artery Disease Severity Assessed With the SYNTAX Score on Outcomes Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Jean-Michel Paradis; Jonathon M White; Philippe Généreux; Marina Urena; Darshan Doshi; Tamim Nazif; Rebecca Hahn; Isaac George; Omar Khalique; Kishore Harjai; Laura Lasalle; Benoit M Labbé; Robert DeLarochellière; Daniel Doyle; Éric Dumont; Siamak Mohammadi; Martin B Leon; Josep Rodés-Cabau; Susheel Kodali
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 5.501

9.  FHL-1 is not involved in pressure overload-induced maladaptive right ventricular remodeling and dysfunction.

Authors:  Christine Veith; Dariusch Neghabian; Himal Luitel; Jochen Wilhelm; Bakytbek Egemnazarov; Caja Muntanjohl; Jan-Hendrik Fischer; Bhola Kumar Dahal; Ralph Theo Schermuly; Hossein Ardeschir Ghofrani; Friedrich Grimminger; Ludger Fink; Grazyna Kwapiszewska; Norbert Weissmann; Akylbek Sydykov
Journal:  Basic Res Cardiol       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 17.165

10.  Assessment of left ventricular mass and volumes by three-dimensional echocardiography in patients with or without wall motion abnormalities: comparison against cine magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  A-C Pouleur; J-B le Polain de Waroux; A Pasquet; B L Gerber; O Gérard; P Allain; J-L J Vanoverschelde
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 5.994

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.