Literature DB >> 24400204

Exercise stress echocardiography in patients with aortic stenosis: impact of baseline diastolic dysfunction and functional capacity on mortality and aortic valve replacement.

Andrew N Rassi1, Wael Aljaroudi2, Sahar Naderi3, M Chadi Alraies4, Venu Menon3, Leonardo Rodriguez3, Richard Grimm3, Brian Griffin3, Wael A Jaber3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with aortic stenosis (AS) often undergo exercise echocardiography. Diastolic dysfunction (DD) is frequently associated with AS but little is known about its impact on functional capacity (FC). We sought to determine the relationship between DD and FC and their impact on mortality and need for aortic valve replacement (AVR) in patients with AS. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Data was analyzed for consecutive patients with any degree of AS undergoing exercise stress echocardiography between 2000 and 2010 at our institution. The primary endpoint was a composite of death or need for AVR. We identified 1,267 patients [mean age 67±11 years, ejection fraction (56±7)%, mean aortic valve gradient 19±12 mmHg, mean maximal metabolic equivalents (METs) achieved 8±2.6]. The proportion with normal, stage 1, and ≥ stage 2 diastology was 195 (15%), 928 (73%), 144 (12%). A total of 475 (37.5%) patients had a primary outcome with 164 deaths (mean follow up 5.6±4.1 years) and 341 AVR (mean follow up 2.4±2.6 years). Predictors of FC were age, gender, body mass index, Bruce protocol, heart rate recovery (HRR), ejection fraction, mean aortic valve gradient, and diabetes but not baseline DD. Baseline DD [HR 1.82, 95% CI (1.17, 2.82), P=0.008] and FC [HR 0.93, 95% CI (0.88, 0.98), P=0.003] were independent predictors of death or AVR.
CONCLUSIONS: For patients with AS undergoing exercise echocardiography, baseline DD was not predictive of FC. However, both baseline DD and FC were independent predictors of death or need for AVR.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diastolic dysfunction (DD); aortic stenosis (AS); aortic valve replacement (AVR); death; stress echocardiogram

Year:  2013        PMID: 24400204      PMCID: PMC3878118          DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2223-3652.2013.10.01

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther        ISSN: 2223-3652


  34 in total

1.  Age and valve size effect on the long-term durability of the Carpentier-Edwards aortic pericardial bioprosthesis.

Authors:  M K Banbury; D M Cosgrove; J A White; E H Blackstone; R W Frater; J E Okies
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  Impact of progression of diastolic dysfunction on mortality in patients with normal ejection fraction.

Authors:  Wael Aljaroudi; M Chadi Alraies; Carmel Halley; Leonardo Rodriguez; Richard A Grimm; James D Thomas; Wael A Jaber
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Clinical outcome in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis: insights from the new proposed aortic stenosis grading classification.

Authors:  Patrizio Lancellotti; Julien Magne; Erwan Donal; Laurent Davin; Kim O'Connor; Monica Rosca; Catherine Szymanski; Bernard Cosyns; Luc A Piérard
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Mortality rate in patients with diastolic dysfunction and normal systolic function.

Authors:  Carmel M Halley; Penny L Houghtaling; Mazen K Khalil; James D Thomas; Wael A Jaber
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2011-06-27

5.  Value of exercise testing to evaluate the indication for surgery in asymptomatic patients with valvular aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Domenico Alborino; Jacques Lars Hoffmann; Pierre Claude Fournet; Antoine Bloch
Journal:  J Heart Valve Dis       Date:  2002-03

6.  Gender and referral for coronary angiography after treadmill thallium testing.

Authors:  M S Lauer; F J Pashkow; C E Snader; S A Harvey; J D Thomas; T H Marwick
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1996-08-01       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  Interaction and prognostic effects of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and patient-prosthesis mismatch as determinants of outcome after isolated aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Joseph Brown; Pallav Shah; Tony Stanton; Thomas H Marwick
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2009-06-24       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  Prognostication of valvular aortic stenosis using tissue Doppler echocardiography: underappreciated importance of late diastolic mitral annular velocity.

Authors:  Kian-Keong Poh; Mark Yan-Yee Chan; Hong Yang; Quek-Wei Yong; Yiong-Huak Chan; Lieng H Ling
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2007-10-10       Impact factor: 5.251

9.  Left ventricular mass and body size in normotensive children and adults: assessment of allometric relations and impact of overweight.

Authors:  G de Simone; S R Daniels; R B Devereux; R A Meyer; M J Roman; O de Divitiis; M H Alderman
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1992-11-01       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Diastolic filling dynamics in patients with aortic stenosis.

Authors:  T Murakami; O M Hess; J E Gage; J Grimm; H P Krayenbuehl
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  1 in total

1.  Patterns of left ventricular remodeling in aortic stenosis: therapeutic implications.

Authors:  Sammy Elmariah
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2015-07
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.