Literature DB >> 10450912

Do temporal processing deficits cause phonological processing problems?

S Nittrouer1.   

Abstract

This study tested the hypothesis that temporal processing deficits underlie phonological processing problems. The subjects were children aged 8 to 10 years (N = 110) who were separated into 2 groups on the basis of whether their reading scores were normal or poor. As predicted by many earlier studies, children with poor reading scores demonstrate poor abilities on tests of phonological awareness, as well as on 2 other language tasks that depend on phonological processing. Two specific tests of the temporal processing hypothesis were conducted. Children in both groups were tested (a) on their abilities to recall sequences of nonspeech tones presented at various rates and (b) on their abilities to make phonetic decisions using brief and transitional properties of the speech signal, especially formant transitions (the purported "trouble spot" in the speech signal for children with phonological processing problems). The children with poor phonological processing abilities showed no special difficulty recalling rapidly presented nonspeech stimuli, and, in their phonetic decisions, they were able to use brief and transitional signal properties, including formant transitions, at least as well as other children. Therefore, no evidence was found to support the hypothesis that temporal processing deficits cause phonological processing problems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10450912     DOI: 10.1044/jslhr.4204.925

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  32 in total

1.  Investigating speech perception in children with dyslexia: is there evidence of a consistent deficit in individuals?

Authors:  Souhila Messaoud-Galusi; Valerie Hazan; Stuart Rosen
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Decreased sensitivity to phonemic mismatch in spoken word processing in adult developmental dyslexia.

Authors:  Esther Janse; Elise de Bree; Susanne Brouwer
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2010-12

3.  Age-related differences in weighting and masking of two cues to word-final stop voicing in noise.

Authors:  Susan Nittrouer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 4.  From temporal processing to developmental language disorders: mind the gap.

Authors:  Athanassios Protopapas
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Speech perception among school-aged skilled and less skilled readers.

Authors:  Ratree P Wayland; Erin Eckhouse; Linda Lombardino; Rosalyn Roberts
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2010-12

6.  Speech perception in noise by children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Amanda Caldwell; Susan Nittrouer
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Nonword repetition in children with cochlear implants: a potential clinical marker of poor language acquisition.

Authors:  Susan Nittrouer; Amanda Caldwell-Tarr; Emily Sansom; Jill Twersky; Joanna H Lowenstein
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.408

8.  Speech Recognition in Noise by Children with and without Dyslexia: How is it Related to Reading?

Authors:  Susan Nittrouer; Letitia M Krieg; Joanna H Lowenstein
Journal:  Res Dev Disabil       Date:  2018-05-01

9.  Auditory scene analysis in school-aged children with developmental language disorders.

Authors:  E Sussman; M Steinschneider; W Lee; K Lawson
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2014-02-15       Impact factor: 2.997

10.  Perceptual organization of speech signals by children with and without dyslexia.

Authors:  Susan Nittrouer; Joanna H Lowenstein
Journal:  Res Dev Disabil       Date:  2013-05-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.