Literature DB >> 21109251

What is the deficit in phonological processing deficits: auditory sensitivity, masking, or category formation?

Susan Nittrouer1, Samantha Shune, Joanna H Lowenstein.   

Abstract

Although children with language impairments, including those associated with reading, usually demonstrate deficits in phonological processing, there is minimal agreement as to the source of those deficits. This study examined two problems hypothesized to be possible sources: either poor auditory sensitivity to speech-relevant acoustic properties, mainly formant transitions, or enhanced masking of those properties. Adults and 8-year-olds with and without phonological processing deficits (PPD) participated. Children with PPD demonstrated weaker abilities than children with typical language development (TLD) in reading, sentence recall, and phonological awareness. Dependent measures were word recognition, discrimination of spectral glides, and phonetic judgments based on spectral and temporal cues. All tasks were conducted in quiet and in noise. Children with PPD showed neither poorer auditory sensitivity nor greater masking than adults and children with TLD, but they did demonstrate an unanticipated deficit in category formation for nonspeech sounds. These results suggest that these children may have an underlying deficit in perceptually organizing sensory information to form coherent categories.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21109251      PMCID: PMC3271439          DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2010.10.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol        ISSN: 0022-0965


  37 in total

1.  Evaluation of the Computer-assisted Speech Perception Assessment Test (CASPA).

Authors:  C L Mackersie; A Boothroyd; D Minniear
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.664

2.  The auditory basis of language impairments: temporal processing versus processing efficiency hypotheses.

Authors:  Douglas E H Hartley; Penny R Hill; David R Moore
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.675

Review 3.  Auditory temporal processing impairment: neither necessary nor sufficient for causing language impairment in children.

Authors:  D V Bishop; R P Carlyon; J M Deeks; S J Bishop
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Developmental aphasia: impaired rate of non-verbal processing as a function of sensory modality.

Authors:  P Tallal; M Piercy
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1973-10       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Effects of acoustic and semantic similarity on short-term paired-associate learning.

Authors:  A D Baddeley
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  1970-08

6.  Is there a relationship between speech and nonspeech auditory processing in children with dyslexia?

Authors:  S Rosen; E Manganari
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Deficits in speech perception predict language learning impairment.

Authors:  Johannes C Ziegler; Catherine Pech-Georgel; Florence George; F-Xavier Alario; Christian Lorenzi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-09-14       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  The role of temporal and dynamic signal components in the perception of syllable-final stop voicing by children and adults.

Authors:  Susan Nittrouer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  A family aggregation study: the influence of family history and other risk factors on language development.

Authors:  Naseem Choudhury; April Ann Benasich
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Phoneme awareness is a better predictor of early reading skill than onset-rime awareness.

Authors:  Charles Hulme; Peter J Hatcher; Kate Nation; Angela Brown; John Adams; George Stuart
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2002-05
View more
  20 in total

1.  Measuring what matters: effectively predicting language and literacy in children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Susan Nittrouer; Amanda Caldwell; Christopher Holloman
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-05-28       Impact factor: 1.675

Review 2.  From temporal processing to developmental language disorders: mind the gap.

Authors:  Athanassios Protopapas
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Speech perception in noise by children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Amanda Caldwell; Susan Nittrouer
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Nonword repetition in children with cochlear implants: a potential clinical marker of poor language acquisition.

Authors:  Susan Nittrouer; Amanda Caldwell-Tarr; Emily Sansom; Jill Twersky; Joanna H Lowenstein
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.408

5.  Individual Differences in Distributional Learning for Speech: What's Ideal for Ideal Observers?

Authors:  Rachel M Theodore; Nicholas R Monto; Stephen Graham
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Weighting of Acoustic Cues to a Manner Distinction by Children With and Without Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Susan Nittrouer; Joanna H Lowenstein
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Improving speech-in-noise recognition for children with hearing loss: potential effects of language abilities, binaural summation, and head shadow.

Authors:  Susan Nittrouer; Amanda Caldwell-Tarr; Eric Tarr; Joanna H Lowenstein; Caitlin Rice; Aaron C Moberly
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.117

8.  Speech Recognition in Noise by Children with and without Dyslexia: How is it Related to Reading?

Authors:  Susan Nittrouer; Letitia M Krieg; Joanna H Lowenstein
Journal:  Res Dev Disabil       Date:  2018-05-01

9.  Auditory scene analysis in school-aged children with developmental language disorders.

Authors:  E Sussman; M Steinschneider; W Lee; K Lawson
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2014-02-15       Impact factor: 2.997

10.  Perceptual organization of speech signals by children with and without dyslexia.

Authors:  Susan Nittrouer; Joanna H Lowenstein
Journal:  Res Dev Disabil       Date:  2013-05-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.