Literature DB >> 7876436

Intensity discrimination under forward and backward masking: role of referential coding.

C J Plack1, R P Carlyon, N F Viemeister.   

Abstract

The present experiments investigated the hypothesis that listeners can code intensity by reference to proximal stimuli in order to improve intensity discrimination performance in conditions of nonsimultaneous masking. The experiments used 30-ms tone bursts as the masker, pedestal, and "proximal burst." The masker level was 80 dB, the pedestal level was 50 dB. In the first experiment the silent interval between the masker and the pedestal was varied. Surprisingly, in both forward and backward masking situations, the Weber fraction decreased as the silent interval was decreased from 100 to 12.5 ms. This is consistent with the referential coding hypothesis: At short intervals performance improves because the level of the pedestal is coded by reference to the proximal masker. In a further set of experiments, the silent interval was 100 ms and an additional proximal burst was presented either 12.5 ms before or 12.5 ms after the pedestal. The proximal burst produced a substantial decrease in the Weber fraction, but only when it was close in frequency to the pedestal, and with a higher intensity. The results are consistent with the auditory system having the ability to produce a robust intensity measure by reference to proximal signals. These findings also provide further evidence that the mid-level elevation in forward masking is not solely the result of processes operating at the level of the auditory nerve.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7876436     DOI: 10.1121/1.412227

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  9 in total

1.  Age-related differences in weighting and masking of two cues to word-final stop voicing in noise.

Authors:  Susan Nittrouer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Effects of masker envelope coherence on intensity discrimination.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Cortical pitch response components index stimulus onset/offset and dynamic features of pitch contours.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour; Saradha Ananthakrishnan; Venkatakrishnan Vijayaraghavan
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Exploring the source of the mid-level hump for intensity discrimination in quiet and the effects of noise.

Authors:  Elin Roverud; Elizabeth A Strickland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Language experience enhances early cortical pitch-dependent responses.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour; Saradha Ananthakrishnan; Venkatakrishnan Vijayaraghavan
Journal:  J Neurolinguistics       Date:  2015-02-01       Impact factor: 1.710

Review 6.  Central gain control in tinnitus and hyperacusis.

Authors:  Benjamin D Auerbach; Paulo V Rodrigues; Richard J Salvi
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 4.003

7.  Sequential grouping modulates the effect of non-simultaneous masking on auditory intensity resolution.

Authors:  Daniel Oberfeld; Patricia Stahn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Factors limiting performance in a multitone intensity-discrimination task: disentangling non-optimal decision weights and increased internal noise.

Authors:  Daniel Oberfeld; Martha Kuta; Walt Jesteadt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Why do forward maskers affect auditory intensity discrimination? Evidence from "molecular psychophysics".

Authors:  Daniel Oberfeld; Patricia Stahn; Martha Kuta
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.