Literature DB >> 16583917

The effects of hearing loss on the contribution of high- and low-frequency speech information to speech understanding. II. Sloping hearing loss.

Benjamin W Y Hornsby1, Todd A Ricketts.   

Abstract

The speech understanding of persons with sloping high-frequency (HF) hearing impairment (HI) was compared to normal hearing (NH) controls and previous research on persons with "flat" losses [Hornsby and Ricketts (2003). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 113, 1706-1717] to examine how hearing loss configuration affects the contribution of speech information in various frequency regions. Speech understanding was assessed at multiple low- and high-pass filter cutoff frequencies. Crossover frequencies, defined as the cutoff frequencies at which low- and high-pass filtering yielded equivalent performance, were significantly lower for the sloping HI, compared to NH, group suggesting that HF HI limits the utility of HF speech information. Speech intelligibility index calculations suggest this limited utility was not due simply to reduced audibility but also to the negative effects of high presentation levels and a poorer-than-normal use of speech information in the frequency region with the greatest hearing loss (the HF regions). This deficit was comparable, however, to that seen in low-frequency regions of persons with similar HF thresholds and "flat" hearing losses suggesting that sensorineural HI results in a "uniform," rather than frequency-specific, deficit in speech understanding, at least for persons with HF thresholds up to 60-80 dB HL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16583917      PMCID: PMC2735822          DOI: 10.1121/1.2161432

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  27 in total

1.  Speech audibility for listeners with high-frequency hearing loss.

Authors:  C W Turner; K J Cummings
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 1.493

2.  Monosyllabic word recognition at higher-than-normal speech and noise levels.

Authors:  G A Studebaker; R L Sherbecoe; D M McDaniel; C A Gwaltney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Effects of low-pass filtering on the intelligibility of speech in quiet for people with and without dead regions at high frequencies.

Authors:  D A Vickers; B C Moore; T Baer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 4.  Processing speed and timing in aging adults: psychoacoustics, speech perception, and comprehension.

Authors:  M Kathleen Pickora-Fuller
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.117

5.  Maximizing effective audibility in hearing aid fitting.

Authors:  T Y Ching; H Dillon; R Katsch; D Byrne
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Development of the Connected Speech Test (CST).

Authors:  R M Cox; G C Alexander; C Gilmore
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Dead regions in the cochlea: diagnosis, perceptual consequences, and implications for the fitting of hearing AIDS.

Authors:  B C Moore
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2001-03

8.  Use of the Connected Speech Test (CST) with hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  R M Cox; G C Alexander; C Gilmore; K M Pusakulich
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Stop-consonant recognition for normal-hearing listeners and listeners with high-frequency hearing loss. II: Articulation index predictions.

Authors:  J R Dubno; D D Dirks; A B Schaefer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  High-frequency audibility: benefits for hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  C A Hogan; C W Turner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  29 in total

1.  Speech reception by listeners with real and simulated hearing impairment: effects of continuous and interrupted noise.

Authors:  Joseph G Desloge; Charlotte M Reed; Louis D Braida; Zachary D Perez; Lorraine A Delhorne
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Multicenter clinical trial of the Nucleus Hybrid S8 cochlear implant: Final outcomes.

Authors:  Bruce J Gantz; Camille Dunn; Jacob Oleson; Marlan Hansen; Aaron Parkinson; Christopher Turner
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Factors affecting the benefits of high-frequency amplification.

Authors:  Amy R Horwitz; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Spatial separation benefit for unaided and aided listening.

Authors:  Jayne B Ahlstrom; Amy R Horwitz; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Listening Comprehension in Middle-Aged Adults.

Authors:  Mitchell S Sommers
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.493

6.  The Effect of Hearing Aid Bandwidth and Configuration of Hearing Loss on Bimodal Speech Recognition in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Arlene C Neuman; Annette Zeman; Jonathan Neukam; Binhuan Wang; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Individualized estimation of the Speech Intelligibility Index for short sentences: Test-retest reliability.

Authors:  Yi Shen; Donghyeon Yun; Yi Liu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Prospective Study of Dietary Patterns and Hearing Threshold Elevation.

Authors:  Sharon G Curhan; Christopher Halpin; Molin Wang; Roland D Eavey; Gary C Curhan
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  Minimum Reporting Standards for Adult Cochlear Implantation.

Authors:  Oliver F Adunka; Bruce J Gantz; Camille Dunn; Richard K Gurgel; Craig A Buchman
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 3.497

10.  Factors affecting outcomes on the TEN (SPL) test in adults with hearing loss.

Authors:  Benjamin W Y Hornsby; J Andrew Dundas
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.664

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.