Literature DB >> 16148211

Enhanced counseling for women undergoing BRCA1/2 testing: impact on subsequent decision making about risk reduction behaviors.

Suzanne M Miller1, Pagona Roussi, Mary B Daly, Joanne S Buzaglo, Kerry Sherman, Andrew K Godwin, Andrew Balshem, Margaret E Atchison.   

Abstract

The authors evaluated the impact of an enhanced counseling intervention, designed to promote well-informed decision making for follow-up risk reduction options for ovarian cancer, among high-risk women undergoing BRCA1/2 testing (N = 77). Following standard genetic counseling, participants received either an enhanced counseling session--designed to help participants anticipate their reactions to possible test outcomes and plan for postresult consequences--or a general health information control session. One week after disclosure of test results, women in the enhanced counseling group experienced a greater reduction in avoidant ideation, suggesting more complete processing of risk feedback. At the 6-month follow-up, intervention respondents reported seeking out more information about prophylactic oophorectomy and were more likely to have actually undergone preventive surgery. The results indicate that the use of enhanced counseling can play an important role in decision making about risk reduction behaviors following BRCA1/2 testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16148211     DOI: 10.1177/1090198105278758

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Educ Behav        ISSN: 1090-1981


  21 in total

1.  Assessment of psychosocial outcomes in genetic counseling research: an overview of available measurement scales.

Authors:  Nadine A Kasparian; Claire E Wakefield; Bettina Meiser
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-08-13       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 2.  Patient responses to genetic information: studies of patients with hereditary cancer syndromes identify issues for use of genetic testing in nephrology practice.

Authors:  Kimberly A Kaphingst; Colleen M McBride
Journal:  Semin Nephrol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 5.299

3.  Parents' attitudes toward pediatric genetic testing for common disease risk.

Authors:  Kenneth P Tercyak; Sharon Hensley Alford; Karen M Emmons; Isaac M Lipkus; Benjamin S Wilfond; Colleen M McBride
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2011-04-18       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  Enhanced counselling for women undergoing BRCA1/2 testing: Impact on knowledge and psychological distress-results from a randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  Pagona Roussi; Kerry Anne Sherman; Suzanne Miller; Joanne Buzaglo; Mary Daly; Alan Taylor; Eric Ross; Andrew Godwin
Journal:  Psychol Health       Date:  2010-04

5.  Factors affecting the decision to undergo risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy among women with BRCA gene mutation.

Authors:  Dongwon Kim; Eunyoung Kang; Euijun Hwang; Young Sun; Yoonsun Hwang; Cha Kyong Yom; Kidong Kim; Jae Hong No; Yong-Beom Kim; Sung-Won Kim
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  Patient outcomes associated with group and individual genetic counseling formats.

Authors:  Erin Rothwell; Wendy Kohlmann; Kory Jasperson; Amanda Gammon; Bob Wong; Anita Kinney
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.375

7.  Effects of a randomized trial comparing standard and enhanced counseling for men at high risk of prostate cancer as a function of race and monitoring style.

Authors:  Pagona Roussi; Suzanne M Miller; Veda N Giri; Elias Obeid; Kuang-Yi Wen; Erin K Tagai; John Scarpato; Laura Gross; Gem Roy
Journal:  J Health Psychol       Date:  2016-10-10

8.  Randomized controlled trial of a psychosocial telephone counseling intervention in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.

Authors:  Kristi D Graves; Lari Wenzel; Marc D Schwartz; George Luta; Paul Wileyto; Steven Narod; Beth N Peshkin; Alfred Marcus; David Cella; Susan Powell Emsbo; Denise Barnes; Chanita Hughes Halbert
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  The process of deciding about prophylactic surgery for breast and ovarian cancer: Patient questions, uncertainties, and communication.

Authors:  Robert Klitzman; Wendy Chung
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.802

10.  Cancer patient and survivor research from the cancer information service research consortium: a preview of three large randomized trials and initial lessons learned.

Authors:  Alfred C Marcus; Michael A Diefenbach; Annette L Stanton; Suzanne M Miller; Linda Fleisher; Peter C Raich; Marion E Morra; Rosemarie Slevin Perocchia; Zung Vu Tran; Mary Anne Bright
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2013-02-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.