Literature DB >> 20200423

Randomized controlled trial of a psychosocial telephone counseling intervention in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.

Kristi D Graves1, Lari Wenzel, Marc D Schwartz, George Luta, Paul Wileyto, Steven Narod, Beth N Peshkin, Alfred Marcus, David Cella, Susan Powell Emsbo, Denise Barnes, Chanita Hughes Halbert.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Responses following BRCA1/2 genetic testing are relevant for the comprehension of risk status and may play a role in risk management decision making. The objective of this study was to evaluate a psychosocial telephone counseling (PTC) intervention delivered to BRCA1/2 mutation carriers following standard genetic counseling (SGC). We examined the effect of the intervention on distress and the concerns related to genetic testing.
METHODS: This prospective randomized clinical trial included 90 BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. We measured anxiety, depression, and genetic testing distress outcomes at intervention baseline and 6 and 12 months following disclosure. We evaluated the effects of SGC versus SGC plus PTC on psychological outcomes using intention-to-treat analyses through generalized estimating equations.
RESULTS: At 6 months, PTC reduced depressive symptoms (Z = -2.25, P = 0.02) and genetic testing distress (Z = 2.18, P = 0.02) compared with SGC. Furthermore, women in the intervention condition reported less clinically significant anxiety at 6 months (chi(2)(1) = 4.11, P = 0.04) than women who received SGC. We found no differences in outcomes between the intervention groups at the 12-month follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: As an adjunct to SGC, PTC delivered following disclosure of positive BRCA1/2 test results seems to offer modest short-term benefits for distress and anxiety. These results build upon a growing literature of psychosocial interventions for BRCA1/2 carriers and, given the potential impact of affect on risk management decision making, suggest that some carriers may derive benefits from adjuncts to traditional genetic counseling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20200423      PMCID: PMC2849295          DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0548

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  31 in total

1.  Anticipated versus actual emotional reactions to disclosure of results of genetic tests for cancer susceptibility: findings from p53 and BRCA1 testing programs.

Authors:  M Dorval; A F Patenaude; K A Schneider; S A Kieffer; L DiGianni; K J Kalkbrenner; J I Bromberg; L A Basili; K Calzone; J Stopfer; B L Weber; J E Garber
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Overemphasis of psychological risks of genetic testing may have "dire" consequences.

Authors:  Steven C Palmer; Ashraf Kagee; Linda Kruus; James C Coyne
Journal:  Psychosomatics       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.386

3.  Communicating genetic test results to the family: a six-step, skills-building strategy.

Authors:  M B Daly; A Barsevick; S M Miller; R Buckman; J Costalas; S Montgomery; R Bingler
Journal:  Fam Community Health       Date:  2001-10

4.  All in the family: evaluation of the process and content of sisters' communication about BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic test results.

Authors:  Chanita Hughes; Caryn Lerman; Marc Schwartz; Beth N Peshkin; Lari Wenzel; Steven Narod; Camille Corio; Kenneth P Tercyak; Danielle Hanna; Claudine Isaacs; David Main
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  2002-01-15

5.  Effects of coping style and BRCA1 and BRCA2 test results on anxiety among women participating in genetic counseling and testing for breast and ovarian cancer risk.

Authors:  K P Tercyak; C Lerman; B N Peshkin; C Hughes; D Main; C Isaacs; M D Schwartz
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.267

6.  A brief assessment of concerns associated with genetic testing for cancer: the Multidimensional Impact of Cancer Risk Assessment (MICRA) questionnaire.

Authors:  David Cella; Chanita Hughes; Amy Peterman; Chih-Hung Chang; Beth N Peshkin; Marc D Schwartz; Lari Wenzel; Amy Lemke; Alfred C Marcus; Caryn Lerman
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.267

7.  Impact of BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation testing on psychologic distress in a clinic-based sample.

Authors:  Marc D Schwartz; Beth N Peshkin; Chanita Hughes; David Main; Claudine Isaacs; Caryn Lerman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Distress and psychiatric morbidity among women from high-risk breast and ovarian cancer families.

Authors:  J C Coyne; N R Benazon; C G Gaba; K Calzone; B L Weber
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2000-10

9.  The meaning and significance of caseness: the Hopkins Symptom Checklist-25 and the Composite International Diagnostic Interview. II.

Authors:  I Sandanger; T Moum; G Ingebrigtsen; T Sørensen; O S Dalgard; D Bruusgaard
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 4.328

10.  Telephone counseling in psychosocial oncology: a report from the Cancer Information and Counseling Line.

Authors:  Alfred C Marcus; Kathleen M Garrett; Alanna Kulchak-Rahm; Denise Barnes; Wendy Dortch; Sara Juno
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2002-04
View more
  23 in total

1.  Long-term reactions to genetic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations: does time heal women's concerns?

Authors:  Chanita Hughes Halbert; Jill E Stopfer; Jasmine McDonald; Benita Weathers; Aliya Collier; Andrea B Troxel; Susan Domchek
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Intervention completion rates among African Americans in a randomized effectiveness trial for diet and physical activity changes.

Authors:  Chanita Hughes Halbert; Scarlett Bellamy; Vanessa Briggs; Marjorie Bowman; Ernestine Delmoor; Jerry C Johnson; Shiriki Kumanyika; Cathy Melvin; Joseph Purnell; Rodney Rogers; Benita Weathers
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Factors Associated with Interest in Gene-Panel Testing and Risk Communication Preferences in Women from BRCA1/2 Negative Families.

Authors:  Kristina G Flores; Laurie E Steffen; Christopher J McLouth; Belinda E Vicuña; Amanda Gammon; Wendy Kohlmann; Lucretia Vigil; Zoneddy R Dayao; Melanie E Royce; Anita Y Kinney
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-08-06       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 4.  Communication and technology in genetic counseling for familial cancer.

Authors:  H T Lynch; C Snyder; M Stacey; B Olson; S K Peterson; S Buxbaum; T Shaw; P M Lynch
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 4.438

5.  Information and support needs of young women regarding breast cancer risk and genetic testing: adapting effective interventions for a novel population.

Authors:  Suzanne C O'Neill; Chalanda Evans; Rebekah J Hamilton; Beth N Peshkin; Claudine Isaacs; Sue Friedman; Kenneth P Tercyak
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  BRCA1/2 genetic testing uptake and psychosocial outcomes in men.

Authors:  Kristi D Graves; Rhoda Gatammah; Beth N Peshkin; Ayelet Krieger; Christy Gell; Heiddis B Valdimarsdottir; Marc D Schwartz
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.375

7.  Long-term outcomes of BRCA1/BRCA2 testing: risk reduction and surveillance.

Authors:  Marc D Schwartz; Claudine Isaacs; Kristi D Graves; Elizabeth Poggi; Beth N Peshkin; Christy Gell; Clinton Finch; Scott Kelly; Kathryn L Taylor; Lauren Perley
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Identification of genetic counseling service delivery models in practice: a report from the NSGC Service Delivery Model Task Force.

Authors:  Stephanie A Cohen; Monica L Marvin; Bronson D Riley; Hetal S Vig; Julie A Rousseau; Shanna L Gustafson
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Biopsychological stress factors in BRCA mutation carriers.

Authors:  Lari Wenzel; Kathyrn Osann; Jenny Lester; Raluca Kurz; Susie Hsieh; Edward L Nelson; Beth Karlan
Journal:  Psychosomatics       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.386

10.  Randomized controlled trial to test a computerized psychosocial cancer assessment and referral program: methods and research design.

Authors:  Erin L O'Hea; Alexandra Cutillo; Laura Dietzen; Tina Harralson; Grant Grissom; Sharina Person; Edwin D Boudreaux
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 2.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.