Literature DB >> 19360448

High intensity focused ultrasound lithotripsy with cavitating microbubbles.

Shin Yoshizawa1, Teiichiro Ikeda, Akira Ito, Ryuhei Ota, Shu Takagi, Yoichiro Matsumoto.   

Abstract

In the medical ultrasound field, microbubbles have recently been the subject of much interest. Controlling actively the effect of the microbubbles, a novel therapeutic method has been investigated. In this paper, our works on high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) lithotripsy with cavitating microbubbles are reviewed and the cavitation detection method to optimize the HIFU intensity is investigated. In the HIFU lithotripsy, collapse of the cloud cavitation is used to fragment kidney stones. Cloud cavitation is potentially the most destructive form of cavitation. When the cloud cavitation is acoustically forced into a collapse, it has the potential to concentrate a very high pressure. For the control of the cloud cavitation collapse, a novel two-frequency wave (cavitation control [C-C] waveform) is designed; a high-frequency ultrasound pulse (1-4 MHz) to create the cloud cavitation and a low-frequency trailing pulse (500 kHz) following the high-frequency pulse to force the cloud into collapse. High-speed photography showed the cavitation collapse on the stone and the shock-wave emission from the cloud. In vitro erosion tests of model and natural stones were also conducted. In the case of model stones, the erosion rate of the C-C waveform showed a distinct advantage with the combined high- and low-frequency waves over either wave alone. For the optimization of the high-frequency ultrasound intensity, the subharmonic acoustic pressure was examined. The results showed relationship between the subharmonic pressure from cavitating bubbles induced by the high-frequency ultrasound and eroded volume of the model stones. Natural stones were eroded and most of the resulting fragments were less than 1 mm in diameter. The method has the potential to provide a novel lithotripsy system with small fragments and localized cavitating bubbles on a stone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19360448     DOI: 10.1007/s11517-009-0471-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  23 in total

1.  Cavitation bubble cluster activity in the breakage of kidney stones by lithotripter shockwaves.

Authors:  Yuriy A Pishchalnikov; Oleg A Sapozhnikov; Michael R Bailey; James C Williams; Robin O Cleveland; Tim Colonius; Lawrence A Crum; Andrew P Evan; James A McAteer
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.942

2.  Dual-pulse lithotripter accelerates stone fragmentation and reduces cell lysis in vitro.

Authors:  Dahlia L Sokolov; Michael R Bailey; Lawrence A Crum
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  Ultracal-30 gypsum artificial stones for research on the mechanisms of stone breakage in shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  James A McAteer; James C Williams; Robin O Cleveland; Javier Van Cauwelaert; Michael R Bailey; David A Lifshitz; Andrew P Evan
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2005-12

4.  In vitro and in vivo enhancement of sonodynamically active cavitation by second-harmonic superimposition.

Authors:  S Umemura; K Kawabata; K Sasaki
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 5.  Cavitation microjets as a contributory mechanism for renal calculi disintegration in ESWL.

Authors:  L A Crum
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Tandem shock wave cavitation enhancement for extracorporeal lithotripsy.

Authors:  Achim M Loske; Fernando E Prieto; Francisco Fernandez; Javier van Cauwelaert
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2002-11-21       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Controlled, forced collapse of cavitation bubbles for improved stone fragmentation during shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  P Zhong; F H Cocks; I Cioanta; G M Preminger
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Use of a microbubble agent to increase the effects of high intensity focused ultrasound on liver tissue.

Authors:  Yukio Kaneko; Toshiyuki Maruyama; Kenji Takegami; Toshiaki Watanabe; Hiroshi Mitsui; Kazuyuki Hanajiri; Hirokazu Nagawa; Yoichiro Matsumoto
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-03-01       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  The role of stress waves and cavitation in stone comminution in shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Songlin Zhu; Franklin H Cocks; Glenn M Preminger; Pei Zhong
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.998

10.  Kidney damage and renal functional changes are minimized by waveform control that suppresses cavitation in shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Andrew P Evan; Lynn R Willis; James A McAteer; Michael R Bailey; Bret A Connors; Youzhi Shao; James E Lingeman; James C Williams; Naomi S Fineberg; Lawrence A Crum
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  10 in total

1.  Histotripsy erosion of model urinary calculi.

Authors:  Alexander P Duryea; Timothy L Hall; Adam D Maxwell; Zhen Xu; Charles A Cain; William W Roberts
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2010-11-22       Impact factor: 2.942

2.  Special issue on microbubbles: from contrast enhancement to cancer therapy.

Authors:  Eleanor Stride; Mohan Edirisinghe
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2009-07-28       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Energy shielding by cavitation bubble clouds in burst wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Kazuki Maeda; Adam D Maxwell; Tim Colonius; Wayne Kreider; Michael R Bailey
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  In vitro comminution of model renal calculi using histotripsy.

Authors:  Alexander P Duryea; Adam D Maxwell; William W Roberts; Zhen Xu; Timothy L Hall; Charles A Cain
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.725

5.  Focused Ultrasound-Induced Cavitation Sensitizes Cancer Cells to Radiation Therapy and Hyperthermia.

Authors:  Shaonan Hu; Xinrui Zhang; Michael Unger; Ina Patties; Andreas Melzer; Lisa Landgraf
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 6.600

6.  Ultrasonic actuation of a fine-needle improves biopsy yield.

Authors:  Emanuele Perra; Eetu Lampsijärvi; Gonçalo Barreto; Muhammad Arif; Tuomas Puranen; Edward Hæggström; Kenneth P H Pritzker; Heikki J Nieminen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Repeated Acoustic Vaporization of Perfluorohexane Nanodroplets for Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging.

Authors:  Austin Van Namen; Sidhartha Jandhyala; Tomas Jordan; Geoffrey P Luke
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 2.725

Review 8.  Potential and problems in ultrasound-responsive drug delivery systems.

Authors:  Ying-Zheng Zhao; Li-Na Du; Cui-Tao Lu; Yi-Guang Jin; Shu-Ping Ge
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2013-04-22

9.  Breast tumor response to ultrasound mediated excitation of microbubbles and radiation therapy in vivo.

Authors:  Priscilla Lai; Christine Tarapacki; William T Tran; Ahmed El Kaffas; Justin Lee; Clinton Hupple; Sarah Iradji; Anoja Giles; Azza Al-Mahrouki; Gregory J Czarnota
Journal:  Oncoscience       Date:  2016-03-24

10.  Uncertainty estimation for temperature measurement with diagnostic ultrasound.

Authors:  Tina A Fuhrmann; Olga Georg; Julian Haller; Klaus-V Jenderka; Volker Wilkens
Journal:  J Ther Ultrasound       Date:  2016-12-01
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.