Literature DB >> 12878251

Dual-pulse lithotripter accelerates stone fragmentation and reduces cell lysis in vitro.

Dahlia L Sokolov1, Michael R Bailey, Lawrence A Crum.   

Abstract

Lithotripsy is a common effective treatment for kidney stones. However, focal volumes are often larger than stones, and surrounding tissue is often injured. Our goal was to test in vitro a new lithotripter consisting of two opposing, confocal and simultaneously triggered electrohydraulic sources. The pulses superimpose at the common focus, resulting in pressure doubling and enhanced cavitation growth in a localized, approximately 1-cm wide volume. Model gypsum stones and human erythrocytes were exposed to dual pulses or single pulses. At the focus, model stones treated with 100 dual pulses at a charging voltage of 15 kV broke into 8 times the number of fragments as stones treated with 200 single pulses at 18 kV. At axial positions 2 and 4 cm away from the focus, lysis of erythrocytes was reduced or equivalent for dual pulses vs. single pulses. Hence, in half the time, dual pulses increased comminution at the focus without increasing injury in surrounding regions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Non-programmatic

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12878251     DOI: 10.1016/s0301-5629(03)00887-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  9 in total

1.  Cavitation clouds created by shock scattering from bubbles during histotripsy.

Authors:  Adam D Maxwell; Tzu-Yin Wang; Charles A Cain; J Brian Fowlkes; Oleg A Sapozhnikov; Michael R Bailey; Zhen Xu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Ultracal-30 gypsum artificial stones for research on the mechanisms of stone breakage in shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  James A McAteer; James C Williams; Robin O Cleveland; Javier Van Cauwelaert; Michael R Bailey; David A Lifshitz; Andrew P Evan
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2005-12

3.  High intensity focused ultrasound lithotripsy with cavitating microbubbles.

Authors:  Shin Yoshizawa; Teiichiro Ikeda; Akira Ito; Ryuhei Ota; Shu Takagi; Yoichiro Matsumoto
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2009-04-10       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Evaluation of an experimental electrohydraulic discharge device for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: Pressure field of sparker array.

Authors:  Guangyan Li; Bret A Connors; Ray B Schaefer; John J Gallagher; Andrew P Evan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 5.  Shock wave lithotripsy: advances in technology and technique.

Authors:  James E Lingeman; James A McAteer; Ehud Gnessin; Andrew P Evan
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 14.432

6.  Assessment of renal injury with a clinical dual head lithotriptor delivering 240 shock waves per minute.

Authors:  Rajash K Handa; James A McAteer; Andrew P Evan; Bret A Connors; Yuri A Pishchalnikov; Sujuan Gao
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Optimizing shock wave lithotripsy: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Paul D McClain; Jessica N Lange; Dean G Assimos
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2013

8.  Focusing of shock waves induced by optical breakdown in water.

Authors:  Georgy N Sankin; Yufeng Zhou; Pei Zhong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.482

9.  Novel instrumentation in urologic surgery: Shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Michelle J Semins; Brian R Matlaga
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2010-07
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.