Literature DB >> 12809867

Variability of renal stone fragility in shock wave lithotripsy.

James C Williams1, K Chee Saw, Ryan F Paterson, Erin K Hatt, James A McAteer, James E Lingeman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To measure, in an in vitro study, the number of shock waves to complete comminution for 195 human stones, representing six major stone types. Not all renal calculi are easily broken with shock wave lithotripsy. Different types of stones are thought to have characteristic fragilities, and suggestions have been made in published reports of variation in the fragility within some types of stones, but few quantitative data are available.
METHODS: Kidney stones classified by their dominant mineral content were broken in an unmodified Dornier HM3 lithotripter or in a research lithotripter modeled after the HM3, and the number of shock waves was counted for each stone until all fragments passed through a sieve (3-mm-round or 2-mm-square holes).
RESULTS: The mean +/- SD number of shock waves to complete comminution was 400 +/- 333 per gram (n = 39) for uric acid; 965 +/- 900 per gram (n = 75) for calcium oxalate monohydrate; 1134 +/- 770 per gram (n = 21) for hydroxyapatite; 1138 +/- 746 per gram (n = 13) for struvite; 1681 +/- 1363 per gram (n = 23) for brushite; and 5937 +/- 6190 per gram (n = 24) for cystine. The variation for these natural stones (83% +/- 15% coefficient of variation) was greater than that for artificial (eg, gypsum-based) stones (17% +/- 8%).
CONCLUSIONS: The variability in stone fragility to shock waves is large, even within groups defined by mineral composition. Thus, knowing the major composition of a stone may not allow adequate prediction of its fragility in lithotripsy treatment. The variation in stone structure could underlie the variation in stone fragility within type, but testing of this hypothesis remains to be done.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12809867     DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(03)00349-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  37 in total

1.  Investigation of the microstructure and mineralogical composition of urinary calculi fragments by synchrotron radiation X-ray microtomography: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Jozef Kaiser; Markéta Holá; Michaela Galiová; Karel Novotný; Viktor Kanický; Petr Martinec; Jiří Sčučka; Francesco Brun; Nicola Sodini; Giuliana Tromba; Lucia Mancini; Tamara Kořistková
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2010-12-16

2.  Predictive value of low tube voltage and dual-energy CT for successful shock wave lithotripsy: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Remo Largo; Paul Stolzmann; Christian D Fankhauser; Cédric Poyet; Pirmin Wolfsgruber; Tullio Sulser; Hatem Alkadhi; Sebastian Winklhofer
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Ultracal-30 gypsum artificial stones for research on the mechanisms of stone breakage in shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  James A McAteer; James C Williams; Robin O Cleveland; Javier Van Cauwelaert; Michael R Bailey; David A Lifshitz; Andrew P Evan
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2005-12

Review 4.  The acute and long-term adverse effects of shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  James A McAteer; Andrew P Evan
Journal:  Semin Nephrol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 5.299

5.  The role of trapped bubbles in kidney stone detection with the color Doppler ultrasound twinkling artifact.

Authors:  Julianna C Simon; Oleg A Sapozhnikov; Wayne Kreider; Michael Breshock; James C Williams; Michael R Bailey
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Fragility of brushite stones in shock wave lithotripsy: absence of correlation with computerized tomography visible structure.

Authors:  James C Williams; Tariq Hameed; Molly E Jackson; Syed Aftab; Alessia Gambaro; Yuri A Pishchalnikov; James E Lingeman; James A McAteer
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-07-21       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 7.  Recent advances in lithotripsy technology and treatment strategies: A systematic review update.

Authors:  H E Elmansy; J E Lingeman
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 6.071

8.  Recurrence rates of urinary calculi according to stone composition and morphology.

Authors:  Michel Daudon; Paul Jungers; Dominique Bazin; James C Williams
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 9.  Shock wave lithotripsy: advances in technology and technique.

Authors:  James E Lingeman; James A McAteer; Ehud Gnessin; Andrew P Evan
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 14.432

10.  Robustness of Textural Features to Predict Stone Fragility Across Computed Tomography Acquisition and Reconstruction Parameters.

Authors:  Taylor Moen; Andrea Ferrero; Cynthia McCollough
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 3.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.