Literature DB >> 18594876

Persons with recurrent low back pain exhibit a rigid postural control strategy.

Simon Brumagne1, Lotte Janssens, Stefanie Knapen, Kurt Claeys, Ege Suuden-Johanson.   

Abstract

Persons with recurrent low back pain (LBP) have been observed to have altered proprioceptive postural control. These patients seem to adopt a body and trunk stiffening strategy and rely more on ankle proprioception to control their posture during quiet upright standing. The aim of this study is to determine the effect of changing postural condition (stable and unstable support surface) on postural stability and proprioceptive postural control strategy in persons with recurrent LBP. Postural sway characteristics of 21 persons with recurrent LBP and 24 healthy individuals were evaluated in upright posture with or without standing on "foam" for the conditions as follows: (1) control (no vibration); (2) vibration of the triceps surae muscles; (3) paraspinal muscle vibration; (4) vibration of the tibialis anterior muscles. Vision was occluded in all conditions except for one control trial. All trials lasted 60 s. Vibration (60 Hz, 0.5 mm), as a potent stimulus for muscle spindles, was initiated 15 s after the start of the trial for a duration of 15 s. Persons with recurrent LBP showed significantly different postural control strategies favoring ankle muscle proprioceptive control (ratio closer to 1) instead of paraspinal muscle proprioceptive control (ratio closer to 0) for both standing without foam (ratio ankle muscle/paraspinal muscle control = 0.83) (P < 0.0001) and on foam (ratio ankle muscle/paraspinal muscle control = 0.87; P < 0.0001) compared to healthy individuals (0.67 and 0.46, respectively). It is concluded that young persons with recurrent LBP seem to use the same proprioceptive postural control strategy even in conditions when this ankle strategy is not the most appropriate such as standing on an unstable support surface. The adopted proprioceptive postural control strategy might be effective in simple conditions, however, when used in all postural conditions this could be a mechanism to undue spinal loading, pain and recurrences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18594876      PMCID: PMC2527415          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-008-0709-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  34 in total

Review 1.  The Oswestry Disability Index.

Authors:  J C Fairbank; P B Pynsent
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  The influence of postural threat on the control of upright stance.

Authors:  M G Carpenter; J S Frank; C P Silcher; G W Peysar
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The effect of expertise in gymnastics on proprioceptive sensory integration in human subjects.

Authors:  N Vuillerme; N Teasdale; V Nougier
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2001-09-28       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  There is no motor redundancy in human movements. There is motor abundance.

Authors:  M Latash
Journal:  Motor Control       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 1.422

5.  The direction of postural instability affects postural reactions to ankle muscle vibration in humans.

Authors:  Y P Ivanenko; I A Solopova; Y S Levik
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2000-10-06       Impact factor: 3.046

6.  Muscle function and dysfunction in the spine.

Authors:  Jacek Cholewicki; Jaap H van Dieën; A Bertrand Arsenault
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.368

7.  Balance in chronic low back pain patients compared to healthy people under various conditions in upright standing.

Authors:  M I Mientjes; J S Frank
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.063

8.  Differences in repositioning error among patients with low back pain compared with control subjects.

Authors:  K L Newcomer; E R Laskowski; B Yu; J C Johnson; K N An
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  The role of paraspinal muscle spindles in lumbosacral position sense in individuals with and without low back pain.

Authors:  S Brumagne; P Cordo; R Lysens; S Verschueren; S Swinnen
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Low back pain recurrence in occupational environments.

Authors:  William S Marras; Sue A Ferguson; Deborah Burr; Pete Schabo; Anthony Maronitis
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  62 in total

1.  Decreased variability in postural control strategies in young people with non-specific low back pain is associated with altered proprioceptive reweighting.

Authors:  Kurt Claeys; Simon Brumagne; Wim Dankaerts; Henri Kiers; Lotte Janssens
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 2.  Center of pressure excursion as a measure of balance performance in patients with non-specific low back pain compared to healthy controls: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Alexander Ruhe; René Fejer; Bruce Walker
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  A kinematic analysis of relative stability of the lower extremities between subjects with and without chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Hang Jin Jo; Ah Young Song; Kyung Jun Lee; Dongchul C Lee; Yoon Hyuk Kim; Paul S Sung
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Ankle proprioception is not targeted by exercises on an unstable surface.

Authors:  Henri Kiers; Simon Brumagne; Jaap van Dieën; Philip van der Wees; Luc Vanhees
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-08-21       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Effects of support surface stability on feedback control of trunk posture.

Authors:  Georgia Andreopoulou; Erwin Maaswinkel; L Eduardo Cofré Lizama; Jaap H van Dieën
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Postural Sway during Local Vibratory Stimulation for Proprioception in Elderly Individuals with Pre-Sarcopenia.

Authors:  Kazunori Yamazaki; Tadashi Ito; Yoshihito Sakai; Reiya Nishio; Yohei Ito; Yoshifumi Morita
Journal:  Phys Ther Res       Date:  2020-07-22

7.  Postural control in individuals with and without non-specific chronic low back pain: a preliminary case-control study.

Authors:  Rene Rogieri Caffaro; Fábio Jorge Renovato França; Thomaz Nogueira Burke; Maurício Oliveira Magalhães; Luiz Armando Vidal Ramos; Amélia Pasqual Marques
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Analysis of relative kinematic index with normalized standing time between subjects with and without recurrent low back pain.

Authors:  Paul S Sung; Pamela Danial
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Using vertebral movement and intact paraspinal muscles to determine the distribution of intrafusal fiber innervation of muscle spindle afferents in the anesthetized cat.

Authors:  William R Reed; Dong-Yuan Cao; Weiqing Ge; Joel G Pickar
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Multivariate classification of structural MRI data detects chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Hoameng Ung; Justin E Brown; Kevin A Johnson; Jarred Younger; Julia Hush; Sean Mackey
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 5.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.