Literature DB >> 24136344

Reduced effects of tendon vibration with increased task demand during active, cyclical ankle movements.

Lisa M Floyd1, Taylor C Holmes, Jesse C Dean.   

Abstract

Tendon vibration can alter proprioceptive feedback, one source of sensory information which humans can use to produce accurate movements. However, the effects of tendon vibration during functional movement vary depending on the task. For example, ankle tendon vibration has considerably smaller effects during walking than standing posture. The purpose of this study was to test whether the effects of ankle tendon vibration are predictably influenced by the mechanical demands of a task, as quantified by peak velocity. Twelve participants performed symmetric, cyclical ankle plantar flexion/dorsiflexion movements while lying prone with their ankle motion unconstrained. The prescribed movement period (1, 3 s) and peak-to-peak amplitude (10°, 15°, 20°) were varied across trials; shorter movement periods or larger amplitudes increased the peak velocity. In some trials, vibration was continuously and simultaneously applied to the right ankle plantar flexor and dorsiflexor tendons, while the left ankle tendons were never vibrated. The vibration frequency (40, 80, 120, 160 Hz) was varied across trials. During trials without vibration, participants accurately matched the movement of their ankles. The application of 80 Hz vibration to the right ankle tendons significantly reduced the amplitude of right ankle movement. However, the effect of vibration was smaller during more mechanically demanding (i.e., higher peak velocity) movements. Higher vibration frequencies had larger effects on movement accuracy, possibly due to parallel increases in vibration amplitude. These results demonstrate that the effects of ankle tendon vibration are dependent on the mechanical demand of the task being performed, but cannot definitively identify the underlying physiological mechanism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24136344      PMCID: PMC3882752          DOI: 10.1007/s00221-013-3739-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  46 in total

1.  Influence of leg muscle vibration on human walking.

Authors:  Y P Ivanenko; R Grasso; F Lacquaniti
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Effects of tendon vibration on the spatiotemporal characteristics of human locomotion.

Authors:  Sabine M P Verschueren; Stephan P Swinnen; Kaat Desloovere; Jacques Duysens
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-01-26       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Continuous, bilateral Achilles' tendon vibration is not detrimental to human walk.

Authors:  G Courtine; T Pozzo; B Lucas; M Schieppati
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  2001-05-01       Impact factor: 4.077

4.  The effect of aging on dynamic position sense at the ankle.

Authors:  S M P Verschueren; S Brumagne; S P Swinnen; P J Cordo
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2002-11-15       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Force control is greater in the upper compared with the lower extremity.

Authors:  Evangelos A Christou; Mark Zelent; Les G Carlton
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.328

Review 6.  Motor schema theory after 27 years: reflections and implications for a new theory.

Authors:  Richard A Schmidt
Journal:  Res Q Exerc Sport       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.500

7.  The contribution of muscle afferents to kinaesthesia shown by vibration induced illusions of movement and by the effects of paralysing joint afferents.

Authors:  G M Goodwin; D I McCloskey; P B Matthews
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1972       Impact factor: 13.501

8.  General features of vibration-induced effects on balance.

Authors:  G Eklund
Journal:  Ups J Med Sci       Date:  1972       Impact factor: 2.384

9.  Diabetic neuropathy and surface sway-referencing disrupt somatosensory information for postural stability in stance.

Authors:  Fay B Horak; Ruth Dickstein; Robert J Peterka
Journal:  Somatosens Mot Res       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.111

10.  Active stiffness of the ankle in response to inertial and elastic loads.

Authors:  K P Granata; S E Wilson; A K Massimini; R Gabriel
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.368

View more
  5 in total

1.  Proprioceptive feedback contributes to the adaptation toward an economical gait pattern.

Authors:  Jill E Hubbuch; Blake W Bennett; Jesse C Dean
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Effects of White Noise Achilles Tendon Vibration on Quiet Standing and Active Postural Positioning.

Authors:  Carly C Sacco; Erin M Gaffney; Jesse C Dean
Journal:  J Appl Biomech       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 1.833

3.  Gait parameter control timing with dynamic manual contact or visual cues.

Authors:  Ely Rabin; Peter Shi; William Werner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  An exploratory investigation of the effects of whole-head vibration on jaw movements.

Authors:  Meg Simione; Jordan R Green
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Hip proprioceptive feedback influences the control of mediolateral stability during human walking.

Authors:  Devin C Roden-Reynolds; Megan H Walker; Camille R Wasserman; Jesse C Dean
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 2.714

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.