Literature DB >> 20824281

Decreased variability in postural control strategies in young people with non-specific low back pain is associated with altered proprioceptive reweighting.

Kurt Claeys1, Simon Brumagne, Wim Dankaerts, Henri Kiers, Lotte Janssens.   

Abstract

Optimal postural control is an essential capacity in daily life and can be highly variable. The purpose of this study was to investigate if young people have the ability to choose the optimal postural control strategy according to the postural condition and to investigate if non-specific low back pain (NSLBP) influences the variability in proprioceptive postural control strategies. Young individuals with NSLBP (n = 106) and healthy controls (n = 50) were tested on a force plate in different postural conditions (i.e., sitting, stable support standing and unstable support standing). The role of proprioception in postural control was directly examined by means of muscle vibration on triceps surae and lumbar multifidus muscles. Root mean square and mean displacements of the center of pressure were recorded during the different trials. To appraise the proprioceptive postural control strategy, the relative proprioceptive weighting (RPW, ratio of ankle muscles proprioceptive inputs vs. back muscles proprioceptive inputs) was calculated. Postural robustness was significantly less in individuals with NSLBP during the more complex postural conditions (p < 0.05). Significantly higher RPW values were observed in the NSLBP group in all postural conditions (p < 0.05), suggesting less ability to rely on back muscle proprioceptive inputs for postural control. Therefore, healthy controls seem to have the ability to choose a more optimal postural control strategy according to the postural condition. In contrast, young people with NSLBP showed a reduced capacity to switch to a more multi-segmental postural control strategy during complex postural conditions, which leads to decreased postural robustness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20824281     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-010-1637-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  42 in total

1.  Ankle and hip postural strategies defined by joint torques.

Authors:  C F Runge; C L Shupert; F B Horak; F E Zajac
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.840

2.  Variability in a dynamic postural task attests ample flexibility in balance control mechanisms.

Authors:  Marco Schieppati; Andrea Giordano; Antonio Nardone
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-03-23       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Lumbar spine reposition sense: the effect of a 'slouched' posture.

Authors:  Katherine J Dolan; Ann Green
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2006-04-18

4.  Differences in balance strategies between nonspecific chronic low back pain patients and healthy control subjects during unstable sitting.

Authors:  Ulrike Van Daele; Friso Hagman; Steven Truijen; Peter Vorlat; Bart Van Gheluwe; Peter Vaes
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Fibre type characteristics of the lumbar paraspinal muscles in normal healthy subjects and in patients with low back pain.

Authors:  A F Mannion; B R Weber; J Dvorak; D Grob; M Müntener
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.494

6.  Fear of movement/(re)injury in chronic low back pain and its relation to behavioral performance.

Authors:  Johan W S Vlaeyen; Ank M J Kole-Snijders; Ruben G B Boeren; H van Eek
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 6.961

7.  Balance in chronic low back pain patients compared to healthy people under various conditions in upright standing.

Authors:  M I Mientjes; J S Frank
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.063

8.  Differences in repositioning error among patients with low back pain compared with control subjects.

Authors:  K L Newcomer; E R Laskowski; B Yu; J C Johnson; K N An
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  People with chronic low back pain exhibit decreased variability in the timing of their anticipatory postural adjustments.

Authors:  Jesse V Jacobs; Sharon M Henry; Keith J Nagle
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.912

10.  Lumbar position sense and the risk of low back injuries in college athletes: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Sheri P Silfies; Jacek Cholewicki; N Peter Reeves; Hunter S Greene
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2007-12-31       Impact factor: 2.362

View more
  28 in total

1.  Use of motor abundance in old adults in the regulation of a narrow-based stance.

Authors:  Wei-Li Hsu; Kwan-Hwa Lin; Rong-Sen Yang; Chih-Hsiu Cheng
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2013-11-16       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Altered postural responses persist following physical therapy of general versus specific trunk exercises in people with low back pain.

Authors:  Karen V Lomond; Sharon M Henry; Juvena R Hitt; Michael J DeSarno; Janice Y Bunn
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2014-04-24

3.  Effects of support surface stability on feedback control of trunk posture.

Authors:  Georgia Andreopoulou; Erwin Maaswinkel; L Eduardo Cofré Lizama; Jaap H van Dieën
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Effects of lumbosacral orthoses on postural control in individuals with or without non-specific low back pain.

Authors:  Jie Mi; Jiling Ye; Xin Zhao; Jie Zhao
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Associations between Measures of Structural Morphometry and Sensorimotor Performance in Individuals with Nonspecific Low Back Pain.

Authors:  K Caeyenberghs; M Pijnenburg; N Goossens; L Janssens; S Brumagne
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Individuals with non-specific low back pain use a trunk stiffening strategy to maintain upright posture.

Authors:  Stephanie L Jones; Sharon M Henry; Christine C Raasch; Juvena R Hitt; Janice Y Bunn
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 2.368

7.  Task-related and person-related variables influence the effect of low back pain on anticipatory postural adjustments.

Authors:  Jesse V Jacobs; Courtney A Lyman; Juvena R Hitt; Sharon M Henry
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 2.161

8.  Neural mechanisms and functional correlates of altered postural responses to perturbed standing balance with chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Jesse V Jacobs; Carrie L Roy; Juvena R Hitt; Roman E Popov; Sharon M Henry
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 3.590

9.  Using vertebral movement and intact paraspinal muscles to determine the distribution of intrafusal fiber innervation of muscle spindle afferents in the anesthetized cat.

Authors:  William R Reed; Dong-Yuan Cao; Weiqing Ge; Joel G Pickar
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Effect of changing lumbar stiffness by single facet joint dysfunction on the responsiveness of lumbar muscle spindles to vertebral movement.

Authors:  William R Reed; Joel G Pickar; Cynthia R Long
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2014-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.