Literature DB >> 21831495

What's at stake? Genetic information from the perspective of people with epilepsy and their family members.

Sara Shostak1, Dana Zarhin, Ruth Ottman.   

Abstract

Substantial progress has been made in identifying genes that raise risk for epilepsy, and genetic testing for some of these genes is increasingly being used in clinical practice. However, almost no empirical data are available from the perspective of people with epilepsy and their family members about the impact of genetic information and potential benefits and harms of genetic testing. To address this gap we conducted in-depth qualitative interviews with 40 individuals (22 with epilepsy, 18 unaffected) in the USA from families containing multiple affected individuals who had participated in epilepsy genetics research. The interviews were coded and analyzed using the principles of grounded theory. Several major themes emerged from these interviews. Participants expressed "personal theories of inheritance" that emphasized commonalities among relatives and the idea that disease risk is most shared by family members who share physical or personality traits. Most participants said they would have genetic testing if it were offered. They cited many potential benefits, including learning what caused epilepsy in their family, being better able to care and advocate for children at risk, reducing guilt and blame, providing an increased sense of control, and relieving anxiety in unaffected individuals who test negative. The influence of genetic information on reproduction was a particularly salient theme. Although respondents believed genetic testing would be useful for informing their reproductive choices, they also expressed fear that it could lead to external pressures to modify these choices. Other concerns about the potential negative impact of genetic information included increased blame and guilt, increased stigma and discrimination in employment and insurance, self-imposed limitations on life goals, and alterations in fundamental conceptions of "what epilepsy is." Consideration of the perspectives of people with epilepsy and their family members is critical to understanding the implications of contemporary epilepsy genetic research and testing.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21831495      PMCID: PMC3163050          DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.06.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  51 in total

1.  The association between race and attitudes about predictive genetic testing.

Authors:  Nikki Peters; Abigail Rose; Katrina Armstrong
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 2.  Ethical, legal, and social dimensions of epilepsy genetics.

Authors:  Sara Shostak; Ruth Ottman
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.864

3.  Towards a sociology of disease.

Authors:  Stefan Timmermans; Steven Haas
Journal:  Sociol Health Illn       Date:  2008-06-28

4.  Perceptions of Ashkenazi Jewish breast cancer patients on genetic testing for mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2.

Authors:  K A Phillips; E Warner; W S Meschino; J Hunter; M Abdolell; G Glendon; I L Andrulis; P J Goodwin
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.438

5.  Participation in breast cancer susceptibility testing protocols: influence of recruitment source, altruism, and family involvement on women's decisions.

Authors:  G Geller; T Doksum; B A Bernhardt; S A Metz
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Patient perceptions of epilepsy and of doctors who manage epilepsy.

Authors:  G Scambler
Journal:  Seizure       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 3.184

7.  Public knowledge, private grief: a study of public attitudes to epilepsy in the United Kingdom and implications for stigma.

Authors:  Ann Jacoby; Joanne Gorry; Carrol Gamble; Gus A Baker
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.864

Review 8.  Analysis of genetically complex epilepsies.

Authors:  Ruth Ottman
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.864

9.  'Because of the risks': how US pregnant women account for refusing prenatal screening.

Authors:  S Markens; C H Browner; N Press
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Categorizing genetic tests to identify their ethical, legal, and social implications.

Authors:  W Burke; L E Pinsky; N A Press
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  2001
View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  Genetic Testing in Pediatric Epilepsy.

Authors:  Tristan T Sands; Hyunmi Choi
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 5.081

Review 2.  Personal utility in genomic testing: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Jennefer N Kohler; Erin Turbitt; Barbara B Biesecker
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  The Fracture of Relational Space in Depression: Predicaments in Primary Care Help Seeking.

Authors:  Elizabeth Bromley; David Kennedy; Jeanne Miranda; Cathy Donald Sherbourne; Kenneth B Wells
Journal:  Curr Anthropol       Date:  2016-08-15

4.  "Not all my fault": genetics, stigma, and personal responsibility for women with eating disorders.

Authors:  Michele M Easter
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2012-07-04       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Genetic causal attribution of epilepsy and its implications for felt stigma.

Authors:  Maya Sabatello; Jo C Phelan; Dale C Hesdorffer; Sara Shostak; Jeff Goldsmith; Shawn T Sorge; Melodie R Winawer; Wendy K Chung; Ruth Ottman
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 5.864

6.  Genetic testing preferences in families containing multiple individuals with epilepsy.

Authors:  Janice O Okeke; Virginia E Tangel; Shawn T Sorge; Dale C Hesdorffer; Melodie R Winawer; Jeff Goldsmith; Jo C Phelan; Wendy K Chung; Sara Shostak; Ruth Ottman
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 5.864

7.  Return of individual results in epilepsy genomic research: A view from the field.

Authors:  Ruth Ottman; Catharine Freyer; Heather C Mefford; Annapurna Poduri; Daniel H Lowenstein
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 5.864

8.  Impact of behavioral genetic evidence on the adjudication of criminal behavior.

Authors:  Paul S Appelbaum; Nicholas Scurich
Journal:  J Am Acad Psychiatry Law       Date:  2014

9.  Parents' interest in genetic testing of their offspring in multiplex epilepsy families.

Authors:  Courtney B Caminiti; Dale C Hesdorffer; Sara Shostak; Jeff Goldsmith; Shawn T Sorge; Melodie R Winawer; Jo C Phelan; Wendy K Chung; Ruth Ottman
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 5.864

10.  Introduction to the special section on genomics.

Authors:  Elena L Grigorenko; Mary Dozier
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.